Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 49 — part 1

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Paragraph 49 — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 21 May 2026
Result
421 for · 77 against · 33 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 49/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0083
Dossier
2025/2039(INI)
Vote id
193097
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 421 for, 77 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘rights’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 94Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 113Against 2Abst. 7No vote 61 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 16Against 44Abst. 2No vote 19 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.56
PatriotsFor 42Against 10Abst. 19No vote 14 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 3Against 19Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 14Against 2Abst. 4No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France800
Greece100
Ireland300
Italy700
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 531 members

No vote recorded, 186

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 186 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote515 for, 112 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.87 519 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 24 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote529 for, 105 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.86 501 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 136 — part 2 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)Amendment531 for, 84 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 485 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote465 for, 139 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.85 509 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Severe political, humanitarian and human rights crisis in Sudan, in particular the sexual violence and child rapeSplit vote499 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 459 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote474 for, 136 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.84 514 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 48 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote465 for, 118 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 490 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 4 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote538 for, 123 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 499 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 12 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote496 for, 94 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 490 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 437 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193097
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 193097, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193097 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-193097,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 49 — part 1 — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193097}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/193097},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193097, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}