Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
263 for · 83 against · 154 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 14:00
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 37 of 37 on the decision
Official label
A10-0083/2026 – Eleonora Meleti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
192536
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 263 for, 83 against, 154 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 3Against 4Abst. 79No vote 50 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 41Against 7Abst. 10No vote 19 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
EPPFor 99Against 3Abst. 12No vote 69 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 6Against 10Abst. 43No vote 22 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.59
PatriotsFor 26Against 35Abst. 4No vote 20 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 3No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 11Against 6Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France800
Greece100
Ireland300
Italy600
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 500 members

No vote recorded, 217

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 217 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsFinal458 for, 72 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.72 449 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote420 for, 88 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 415 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.69 432 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 417 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 78 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 409 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote392 for, 153 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.68 414 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.66 412 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.66 410 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.65 413 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyFinal385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.65 419 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. Vote, 21 May 2026. votingId 192536, reference 2025/2039(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/192536 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-21-192536,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/192536}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-21/192536},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 192536, reference 2025/2039(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}