Skip to content

Decision

The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward

Effect
Adopted
Result
337 for · 178 against · 44 abstained roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:38–13:49
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Isabella Lövin
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesClimate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
54 votes · 27 roll calls · 19 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · EPP (5 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
192528
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 337 for, 178 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 19 amendments (4 adopted, 15 rejected) and 34 parts of the text voted on separately (15 adopted, 19 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 20Against 9Abst. 8No vote 8 of 45Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 97Against 0Abst. 0No vote 39 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 100Against 12Abst. 18No vote 53 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
ECRFor 4Against 53Abst. 9No vote 15 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 1No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 8Against 7Abst. 5No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 47

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium113350.47
Bulgaria83060.59
Cyprus0006—
Czechia48540.21
Germany61163160.64
Denmark121020.88
Estonia4102—
Spain18916170.13
Finland100051.00
France37284120.30
Greece371100.45
Croatia91020.85
Hungary58150.36
Ireland130011.00
Italy20310250.41
Lithuania8102—
Luxembourg4011—
Latvia5301—
Malta1005—
Netherlands189040.50
Poland734660.59
Portugal162120.76
Romania1652100.54
Sweden200011.00
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia72150.55

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 559 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECRSpeeches121 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Emma WIESNER SwedenRenewSpeeches318 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sebastian EVERDING GermanyThe LeftSpeeches318 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches218 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Isabella LÖVIN SwedenGreensSpeeches218 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 14 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Anja HAZEKAMP NetherlandsThe LeftSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Karin KARLSBRO SwedenRenewSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jessica POLFJÄRD SwedenEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Niclas HERBST GermanyEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Asger CHRISTENSEN DenmarkRenewSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Liudas MAŽYLIS LithuaniaEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rasmus NORDQVIST DenmarkGreensSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECRSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Sofie ERIKSSON SwedenS&DSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group GermanyESNSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Willemien KONING NetherlandsEPPSpeeches118 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 54

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
2Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 3 – Am 25 Roll call198 for, 366 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
3Separate vote on paragraph 4 Counted290 for, 165 against, 112 abstained Adopted
Show the other 53 votesShow the other 51 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 3 – Am 25 Roll call198 for, 366 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
3Separate vote on paragraph 4 Counted290 for, 165 against, 112 abstained Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 6 – Am 27 Roll call187 for, 380 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
5Separate vote on paragraph 7 Counted314 for, 202 against, 50 abstained Adopted
6Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 8 – Am 29D Roll call191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
7Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9 – Am 30D Roll call158 for, 374 against, 36 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
8Paragraph 9 — part 1 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9/1 Part voted on: “Calls for the prevention of irreversible ecological damage to herring and sprat populations in the Baltic Sea in order to secure the long-term viability of coastal and small-scale fisheries targeting those species and safeguarding marine food webs;”Roll call422 for, 83 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
9Paragraph 9 — part 2 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9/2 Part voted on: “believes that, based on scientific advice, recovery pauses for the respective stocks must be urgently considered, until scientific evidence demonstrates a clear and sustained recovery of the stocks;”Roll call306 for, 225 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
10Separate vote on paragraph 10 Show of hands Rejected
11Separate vote on paragraph 13 Counted321 for, 228 against, 12 abstained Adopted
12Separate vote on paragraph 14 Show of hands Rejected
13Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 18 – Am 34D Roll call198 for, 354 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
14Vote on text inserted after paragraph 18 Show of hands Rejected
15Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 21 – Am 35 Roll call205 for, 262 against, 96 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
16Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 22 – Am 36 Roll call208 for, 264 against, 94 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
17Separate vote on paragraph 23 Show of hands Rejected
18Separate vote on paragraph 26 Show of hands Rejected
19Separate vote on paragraph 35 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 35 Roll call551 for, 12 against, 5 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
20Separate vote on paragraph 36 Show of hands Rejected
21Vote on text inserted after paragraph 36 Show of hands Adopted
22Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 1 Roll call158 for, 398 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
23Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 2 Roll call202 for, 346 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
24Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 3 Roll call205 for, 344 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
25Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 36 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 4 Roll call279 for, 121 against, 167 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
26Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 1 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 5/1 Part voted on: “Recalls that Baltic seal populations were brought to the brink of extinction in the 1970s;”Roll call388 for, 120 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
27Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – After § 36 – Am 5/2 Part voted on: “points out that environmental and anthropogenic factors still pose a risk to the long-term survival of Baltic seal populations, despite their partial recovery; calls on the Commission and the Member States to uphold seal protection measures;”Roll call226 for, 296 against, 46 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: EPP
28Separate vote on paragraph 37 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 37 Roll call391 for, 90 against, 84 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
29Separate vote on paragraph 40 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 40 Roll call531 for, 24 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
30Amendment 12 to paragraph 43 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 43 – Am 12 Roll call501 for, 49 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
31Separate vote on paragraph 52 Show of hands Rejected
32Separate vote on paragraph 54 Show of hands Rejected
33Amendment 42 to paragraph 55 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 55 – Am 42D Roll call166 for, 356 against, 40 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
34Amendment 43 to paragraph 56 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 56 – Am 43 Roll call162 for, 384 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
35Paragraph 56 — part 1 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 56/1 Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission and the Member States for the Baltic Sea to propose halting trawling for fish meal and fish oil during a rebuilding phase, and limiting extractive activities in MPAs;”Roll call378 for, 171 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
36Paragraph 56 — part 2 A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 56/2 Part voted on: “recognises that approaches differ across the Union in the light of specific ecological, legal and socio‑economic contexts; Encourages the Member States to continue developing proportionate, science-based solutions in cooperation with stakeholders, in particular the fishing sector and coastal communities, to improve marine protection while ensuring the viability of the EU fisheries sector through a just transition;”Roll call537 for, 26 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
37Amendment 13 to recital A A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – Recital A – Am 13 Roll call293 for, 263 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
38Vote on text inserted after recital D Show of hands Rejected
39Vote on text inserted after recital D Show of hands Rejected
40Separate vote on recital N Counted287 for, 255 against, 17 abstained Adopted
41Separate vote on recital S Counted287 for, 264 against, 8 abstained Adopted
42Separate vote on recital S Show of hands Rejected
43Separate vote on recital T Show of hands Rejected
44Separate vote on recital V Counted229 for, 259 against, 71 abstained Rejected
45Amendment 6 to recital Y A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – Recital Y – Am 6 Roll call122 for, 432 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
46Separate vote on recital AB Show of hands Rejected
47Separate vote on recital AF Show of hands Rejected
48Separate vote on recital AI Show of hands Rejected
49Separate vote on recital AJ Counted295 for, 253 against, 7 abstained Adopted
50Separate vote on recital AM Show of hands Rejected
51Amendment 7 to recital AY A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – Recital AY – Am 7 Roll call175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
52Separate vote on recital AZ Show of hands Rejected
53Separate vote on recital AZ Show of hands Adopted
54Final vote — text as a whole A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call337 for, 178 against, 44 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, ECR, ESN · split votes by EPP (5).

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0121

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea, calling for urgent action to address the sea's critical state and proposing changes to fisheries management.

The resolution sets out immediate actions within current rules, steps to improve scientific advice, and a new management approach requiring legal changes to the Baltic MAP.

Parliament's position is that the existing plan has failed to restore fish stocks and that a reset of the ecosystem is needed, with a focus on low-impact fishing for human consumption.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution on the Baltic Sea multiannual plan calls for urgent action to recover fish stocks, improve scientific advice, and address environmental pressures.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2127(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 21 May 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 15 April 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 23 April 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 21 May 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: PECH · Author: Isabella LÖVIN (Greens)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 14 connections: Running issue: Common Fisheries Policy · Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Common Fisheries Policy

Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on PECH dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. Decision, 21 May 2026. votingId 192528, document A-10-2026-0121, reference 2024/2127(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-21-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 192528, document A-10-2026-0121, reference 2024/2127(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}