Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI

Effect
Adopted
Result
244 for · 179 against · 15 abstained roll call
Date
15 June 2026, 18:10
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a small majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting
Monday 15 June 2026
Final vote
193974
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a small majority.

The agenda was changed.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and Patriots; opposed by EPP, ECR and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 86Against 0Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 110Abst. 0No vote 75 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 33Abst. 0No vote 48 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 27Against 23Abst. 9No vote 26 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
ESNFor 0Against 11Abst. 1No vote 15 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 12Against 2Abst. 5No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 1

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

  • ESN line Against · 1 abstained of 12 who voted

    Abstained (1)

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria87050.30
Belgium106060.44
Bulgaria5318—
Cyprus0204—
Czechia211170.68
Germany35290320.32
Denmark103020.65
Estonia0106—
Spain21180210.31
Finland73050.55
France5031270.89
Greece87150.25
Croatia1407—
Hungary14970.46
Ireland12011—
Italy23190340.32
Lithuania4205—
Luxembourg3201—
Latvia2205—
Malta1104—
Netherlands168070.50
Poland7270190.69
Portugal640110.40
Romania64023—
Sweden830100.59
Slovenia3303—
Slovakia6126—

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 438 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI Roll call244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-15/1
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI”. Decision, 15 June 2026. votingId 193974. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-15/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-15/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-15-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S\&D Group – AI}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-15/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-15/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193974. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}