Skip to content

Member

Thijs REUTEN

S&D · Netherlands

Group
S&D
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
97.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
92.9 %ⓘ of 604 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PRO Progressief Nederland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
39 of 597 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO, AFET, LIBE (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
218347
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.4 %

604 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+7.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.9 %

561 of 604 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−4.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.5 %

39 of 597 votes where their group had a clear line

20 opposite (for ↔ against), 18 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.5 %

21 of 604 votes cast

Participation 97.4 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Thijs REUTEN97.4 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 92.9 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Thijs REUTEN92.9 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 404 for, 208 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 19 to recital B 176 for, 446 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 24 to paragraph 22 187 for, 430 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 19 192 for, 429 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 22 to paragraph 19 190 for, 438 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Paragraph 17 — part 3 282 for, 335 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Paragraph 17 — part 2 287 for, 278 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Paragraph 17 — part 1 434 for, 173 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 21 to paragraph 9 196 for, 410 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 8 267 for, 278 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6 299 for, 293 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 20 to paragraph 5 165 for, 461 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 313 for, 270 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 392 for, 219 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after recital 3 71 for, 476 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Paragraph 32 — part 3 383 for, 220 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 30 70 for, 506 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 28 183 for, 404 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Paragraph 28 — part 2 593 for, 23 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 16 to paragraph 28 189 for, 415 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 441 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Paragraph 24 — part 2 444 for, 176 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 22 79 for, 519 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 22 97 for, 367 against, 161 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 16 71 for, 388 against, 171 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 62 for, 535 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 58 for, 544 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 67 for, 501 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 11 107 for, 458 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 458 for, 72 against, 98 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Separate vote on paragraph 53 379 for, 180 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Separate vote on paragraph 30 340 for, 155 against, 124 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Separate vote on paragraph 29 418 for, 140 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Paragraph 10 — part 2 377 for, 163 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors Paragraph 10 — part 1 449 for, 139 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/004 BE/Tupperware – Belgium Final vote on the motion for a resolutionPassed 562 for, 53 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026EU-Ecuador Agreement: cooperation between Europol and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combating serious crime and terrorism Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 586 for, 21 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 455 for, 101 against, 74 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final votePassed 458 for, 103 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 12, adding text after recital 5 201 for, 413 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 18, adding text after recital 4 270 for, 325 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 10, adding text after recital 3 195 for, 424 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 3 to Article 1 488 for, 92 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 2, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 2 334 for, 251 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 2, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 469 for, 77 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 5, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 235 for, 203 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 1, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 540 for, 21 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Proposal to reject the text 172 for, 435 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
11 Mar 2026Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 446 for, 100 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 399 for, 78 against, 69 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 748 shared93 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 264 shared93 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands97 % of 5 052 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany96 % of 4 893 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany96 % of 4 136 shared93 %
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DGermany96 % of 5 550 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany95 % of 4 522 shared93 %
Bruno TOBBACK S&DBelgium95 % of 5 481 shared93 %
René REPASI S&DGermany95 % of 5 409 shared93 %
Delara BURKHARDT S&DGermany95 % of 4 460 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 326 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 338 shared83 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 404 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium88 % of 4 101 shared86 %
Tineke STRIK GreensNetherlands88 % of 5 409 shared83 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany88 % of 5 332 shared49 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 685 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 711 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 751 shared86 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany88 % of 5 339 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-ME Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute27 Nov 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-RS Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET22 Sept 2026
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurAFET3 Sept 2026
Institutional aspects of the Common European Defence UnionShadow rapporteurAFCO3 Sept 2026
Conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in respect of Gibraltar between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other partRapporteurAFET20 Jul 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE24 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET12 Feb 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025RapporteurSEDE23 Oct 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe PlanOpinion rapporteurSEDE5 Jun 2025
EU/Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the competent authorities for judicial cooperation in criminal matters of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2024/0167(NLE))Shadow rapporteurLIBE3 Dec 2024
Standing shadow rapporteur UkraineShadow rapporteurAFET14 Nov 2024

Show all 13 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

79 contributions recorded; 17 on behalf of their group; 105 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 58

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Support for effective multilateralism and activation of Blocking Statute to protect the ICC E-10-2026-003672Written questionwith 4 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jul 2026State of play of negotiations on the agreement on the exchange of personal data between Europol and Israel E-10-2026-002925Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
18 Jun 2026Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532Written questionwith 27 co-authors6 Aug 2026
17 Jun 2026Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520Written questionwith 31 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jun 2026Visa ban for (ex-)combatants of armed forces implicated in serious violations E-10-2026-002483Written questionwith 23 co-authors30 Jul 2026
18 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran B-10-2026-0263Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0201Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705Written questionwith 49 co-authors14 Jul 2026

Show all 58 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 37

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 37 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Thijs REUTEN”. Member record. memberId 218347. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/218347?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/218347. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/218347?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-218347,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Thijs REUTEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/218347?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/218347?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 218347. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/218347. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}