Skip to content

Decision

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Effect
Adopted
Result
387 for · 191 against · 46 abstained roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:53–14:58
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Konstantinos Arvanitis
Topics
EU institutions & ParliamentJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
32 votes · 32 roll calls · 20 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
190564
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 20 amendments (1 adopted, 19 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 1 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 13No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 132Against 11Abst. 12No vote 30 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 10No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 51

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium153310.57
Bulgaria64160.32
Cyprus3102—
Czechia611310.33
Germany61165140.62
Denmark112110.68
Estonia6100—
Spain2971590.35
Finland131010.89
France3733290.27
Greece131610.47
Croatia5205—
Hungary68160.30
Ireland130011.00
Italy3531190.28
Lithuania73100.45
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia4131—
Malta0015—
Netherlands199030.52
Poland2423150.25
Portugal173010.78
Romania168180.46
Sweden143130.67
Slovenia5400—
Slovakia49020.54

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches129 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Pina PICIERNO changed group ItalyRenewSpeeches228 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ilhan KYUCHYUK BulgariaRenewSpeeches228 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Dainius ŽALIMAS LithuaniaRenewSpeeches228 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Lukas MANDL AustriaEPPSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Show the other 10 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sven SIMON GermanyEPPSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreensSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Kris VAN DIJCK BelgiumECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Eric SARGIACOMO FranceS&DSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Maravillas ABADÍA JOVER SpainEPPSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jaroslav KNOT CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Mario MANTOVANI ItalyECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against

All votes on this decision, 32

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Paragraph 5 — part 1 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’”Roll call522 for, 62 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: S&D
2Paragraph 5 — part 2 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call373 for, 123 against, 114 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: S&D
3Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 10 – Am 18 Roll call193 for, 409 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Show the other 31 votesShow the other 29 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 5 — part 2 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call373 for, 123 against, 114 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: S&D
3Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 10 – Am 18 Roll call193 for, 409 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 13 – Am 1 Roll call317 for, 275 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
5Paragraph 15 — part 1 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’”Roll call484 for, 78 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: S&D
6Paragraph 15 — part 2 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call375 for, 130 against, 114 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: S&D
7Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 34 – Am 19 Roll call201 for, 420 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
8Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 38 – Am 15 Roll call206 for, 408 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
9Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 44 – Am 16 Roll call181 for, 419 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
10Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 55 – Am 17 Roll call200 for, 419 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
11Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 65 – Am 2 Roll call194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
12Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 77 – Am 3 Roll call196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
13Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 86 – Am 4 Roll call200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
14Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 91 – Am 5 Roll call207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
15Separate vote on paragraph 100 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 100 Roll call357 for, 203 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
16Separate vote on paragraph 101 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 101 Roll call365 for, 168 against, 78 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
17Separate vote on paragraph 102 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 102 Roll call291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
18Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 103 – Am 6 Roll call205 for, 419 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
19Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112 – Am 7 Roll call207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
20Paragraph 112 — part 1 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/1 Part voted on: “Reiterates the obligation of Member States to respect EU and international law in the field of migration and asylum on land and at sea;”Roll call498 for, 80 against, 57 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: ECR, EPP
21Paragraph 112 — part 2 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that migration and asylum policies, including the Pact on Migration and Asylum, are implemented in full compliance with the Charter, the principle of non-refoulement and the principle of responsibility-sharing to ensure that people’s rights to asylum and international protection are upheld;’Roll call408 for, 192 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: ECR, EPP
22Paragraph 112 — part 3 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/3 Part voted on: “reiterates that practices such as stopping asylum seekers and forcibly returning them to the country they entered from without carrying out an individual assessment, arbitrary detention and obstruction of humanitarian aid are contrary to EU and international law;”Roll call284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP, S&D; split: ECR, EPP
23Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 113 – Am 8 Roll call218 for, 401 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
24Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 116 – Am 9 Roll call188 for, 422 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
25Separate vote on paragraph 117 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 117 Roll call336 for, 261 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
26Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 118 – Am 20 Roll call197 for, 416 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
27Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 126 – Am 10 Roll call192 for, 418 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
28Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 155 – Am 13 Roll call282 for, 334 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
29Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 168 – Am 11 Roll call201 for, 419 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
30Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 185 – Am 12 Roll call185 for, 426 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
31Amendment 14 to recital R A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Recital R – Am 14 Roll call220 for, 399 against, 5 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
32Final vote — text as a whole A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call387 for, 191 against, 46 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, EPP, ECR, Patriots · split votes by S&D (2), EPP, ECR.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0091

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its resolution on the Commission's 2025 Rule of Law report, setting out its position on the state of rule of law in the EU.

The resolution calls for strengthening the Commission's reporting, protecting journalists and civil society, and ensuring EU funds do not facilitate rights violations.

It also urges EU institutions to respect rule of law obligations and to address socio-economic inequalities and racism as part of the rule of law agenda.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution responds to the Commission's 2025 Rule of Law report, covering justice systems, anti-corruption, media freedom, civil society, fundamental rights, the EU budget, the single market, enlargement, and the reporting process.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2239(INI) · Own-initiative report

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025

Parliament adopted the text on 29 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 27 November 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 14 April 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 16 April 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 29 April 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Author: Konstantinos ARVANITIS (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 21 connections: Running issue: Rule of law in EU · Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Rule of law in EU

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Decision, 29 April 2026. votingId 190564, document A-10-2026-0091, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-29-25,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 190564, document A-10-2026-0091, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}