Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital AL

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Vote
Separate vote: recital AL
Result
378 for · 197 against · 52 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 110 of 125 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AL
Vote id
191705
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 59Against 65Abst. 27No vote 34 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.15
ECRFor 5Against 62Abst. 11No vote 3 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 35Against 37Abst. 3No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 7Abst. 11No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 476 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 79 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote327 for, 154 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 465 voters
21 May 2026Recital R — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote320 for, 152 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 457 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.91 496 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 555 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote414 for, 193 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 578 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 571 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 567 voters
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSeparate vote359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 569 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital AL — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191705, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191705 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191705,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital AL — Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191705}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191705},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191705, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}