Skip to content

Decision

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Effect
Adopted
Result
328 for · 199 against · 98 abstained roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:32–14:52
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Anna Strolenberg
Topics
Justice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
125 votes · 107 roll calls · 45 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 12 split votes) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 3 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
190917
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 45 amendments (3 adopted, 42 rejected) and 79 parts of the text voted on separately (45 adopted, 34 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 1Abst. 30No vote 3 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 86Against 12Abst. 55No vote 32 of 185Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 6No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 7No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 20

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium143500.45
Bulgaria75140.31
Cyprus1131—
Czechia514110.55
Germany58179120.54
Denmark123000.70
Estonia6100—
Spain2362290.18
Finland131010.89
France27349110.23
Greece56910.17
Croatia5205—
Hungary280110.70
Ireland120110.88
Italy25311280.18
Lithuania73100.45
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia3132—
Malta0015—
Netherlands199030.52
Poland11211560.17
Portugal163200.64
Romania158280.40
Sweden143130.67
Slovenia5400—
Slovakia58110.36

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 625 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches129 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 125

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 1 – Am 22 Roll call213 for, 415 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
2Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 2 – Am 23 Roll call195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
3Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 3 – Am 39 Roll call196 for, 417 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Show the other 124 votesShow the other 122 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 2 – Am 23 Roll call195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
3Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 3 – Am 39 Roll call196 for, 417 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 4 – Am 40 Roll call250 for, 363 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
5Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5 Show of hands Rejected
6Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 5 – Am 50 Roll call207 for, 410 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
7Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 5 – Am 68 Roll call178 for, 412 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
8Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 6 – Am 51 Roll call192 for, 441 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
9Vote on text inserted after paragraph 8 Show of hands Rejected
10Separate vote on paragraph 9 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 9 Roll call425 for, 182 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: Patriots
11Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 10 – Am 52 Roll call129 for, 441 against, 65 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
12Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 10 – Am 61 Roll call270 for, 360 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
13Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 11 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 11 – Am 25 Roll call206 for, 407 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
14Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 12 – Am 62 Roll call199 for, 413 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
15Separate vote on paragraph 15 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 15 – § 26 Roll call210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected
16Vote on text inserted after paragraph 15 Show of hands Rejected
17Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 15 – Am 16/1 Part voted on: 'Calls on the Commission to introduce European preventive mechanisms to make access to EU funds conditional on prior checks on the absence of connections to organised crime, extending this approach to all public and private entities that are beneficiaries of EU-financed contracts, concessions and contributions;’Roll call173 for, 375 against, 95 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, The Left; split: Greens
18Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 15 – Am 16/2 Part voted on: “calls for these mechanisms to be incorporated into the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation and the Common Provisions Regulation, so that protecting EU funds from infiltration by criminal organisations becomes a systematic cross-cutting requirement;”Roll call69 for, 552 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, The Left; split: Greens
19Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 20 – Am 27 Roll call202 for, 438 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
20Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 21 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 21 – Am 17 Roll call91 for, 505 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
21Vote on text inserted after paragraph 21 Show of hands Rejected
22Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 26 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 26 – Am 3 Roll call350 for, 264 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
23Separate vote on paragraph 27 Show of hands Rejected
24Separate vote on paragraph 30 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 30 – § 28 Roll call194 for, 435 against, 5 abstained Rejected
25Separate vote on paragraph 31 Show of hands Rejected
26Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 31 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 31 – Am 30 Roll call206 for, 428 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
27Vote on text inserted after paragraph 31 Show of hands Rejected
28Vote on text inserted after paragraph 31 Show of hands Rejected
29Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 33 – Am 20 Roll call190 for, 439 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
30Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 33 – Am 53 Roll call194 for, 430 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
31Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 63 Roll call207 for, 418 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
32Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 64 Roll call203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
33Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 65 Roll call230 for, 380 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
34Paragraph 43 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 43/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘on the Member States’”Roll call481 for, 86 against, 78 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
35Paragraph 43 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 43/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call344 for, 281 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
36Separate vote on paragraph 45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 45 – § 32 Roll call204 for, 421 against, 13 abstained Rejected
37Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 45 – Am 54 Roll call218 for, 398 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
38Separate vote on paragraph 46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 46 – § 4 Roll call182 for, 432 against, 13 abstained Rejected
39Paragraph 47 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 47/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in full and in a timely manner; highlights the need to meet the implementation deadline; notes with concern the lack of preparedness by some Member States to meet the implementation deadline, including with regard to’”Roll call424 for, 205 against, 5 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: The Left
40Paragraph 47 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 47/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call349 for, 244 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: The Left
41Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 46 – Am 55 Roll call210 for, 420 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
42Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 49 – Am 69 Roll call220 for, 412 against, 1 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
43Paragraph 48 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 48/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including practices involving stopping asylum seekers and forcibly returning them to the country they entered from without carrying out an individual assessment,’”Roll call426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
44Paragraph 48 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 48/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call281 for, 350 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
45Separate vote on paragraph 50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 50 – § 33 Roll call190 for, 417 against, 27 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; separate: Patriots
46Separate vote on paragraph 50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 50 Roll call272 for, 348 against, 23 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; separate: Patriots
47Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 51 – Am 66 Roll call245 for, 386 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
48Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 53 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 53 – Am 43 Roll call180 for, 410 against, 44 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
49Separate vote on paragraph 54 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 54 Roll call414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
50Paragraph 56 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 56/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through the obstruction of legal gender recognition, the erasure of the existence of intersex people, violations of reproductive rights and restrictions on access to essential reproductive healthcare and age-appropriate, comprehensive sexuality education for children;’”Roll call419 for, 173 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
51Paragraph 56 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 56/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call271 for, 331 against, 24 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
52Separate vote on paragraph 57 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 57 Roll call405 for, 176 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
53Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 59 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 59 – Am 56 Roll call213 for, 384 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
54Separate vote on paragraph 60 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 60 Roll call366 for, 190 against, 67 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
55Separate vote on paragraph 61 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 61 Roll call416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
56Paragraph 64 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 64/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘expresses great concern over the growth of the so-called “manosphere” in the online environment;’ ‘and far-right’ and ‘among boys and young men’”Roll call445 for, 102 against, 82 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
57Paragraph 64 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 64/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call287 for, 331 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
58Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 66 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 66 – Am 34 Roll call209 for, 423 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
59Paragraph 67 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 67/1 Part voted on: “Urges the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary measures to fight hate speech and hate crime, both offline and online, especially where such conduct can escalate into violence, including gender-based violence; further stresses the importance of putting in place EU legislation to combat hate crimes and hate speech, including on grounds such as gender identity and sexual orientation; encourages the Commission to follow up on the LGBTIQ+ equality strategy 2026-2030;”Roll call429 for, 192 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots
60Paragraph 67 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 67/2 Part voted on: ‘welcomes the Commission’s initiative to expand the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU to include hate speech and hate crime, highlighting the need to ensure a robust EU criminal law response in this regard;’Roll call418 for, 197 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, Patriots; split: Patriots
61Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 67 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 67 – Am 57 Roll call199 for, 426 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
62Separate vote on paragraph 69 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 69 – § 58 Roll call207 for, 407 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP
63Separate vote on paragraph 69 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 69 Roll call303 for, 328 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP
64Paragraph 70 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 70/1 Part voted on: “Emphasises that the lack of, or the denial of, access to SRHR, including safe and legal abortion, is a form of gender-based violence and a violation of human and fundamental rights;”Roll call401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: ECR
65Paragraph 70 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 70/2 Part voted on: “urges the Commission to actively work towards ensuring broad accessibility to SRHR; reiterates its call for the inclusion of the right to safe and legal abortion in the Charter;”Roll call336 for, 280 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: ECR
66Separate vote on paragraph 71 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 71 Roll call355 for, 237 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
67Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 71 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 71 – Am 44 Roll call221 for, 402 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
68Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 72 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 72 – Am 5 Roll call354 for, 188 against, 99 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
69Paragraph 74 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 74/1 Part voted on: “Condemns in the strongest terms the use of rape and other forms of sexual violence as a weapon of war, and recalls that such conduct can amount to war crimes or crimes against humanity under international law; urges the strengthening of international efforts to document these crimes”Roll call622 for, 6 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
70Paragraph 74 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 74/2 Part voted on: “and emphasises the importance of ensuring access to safe and legal abortion for victims of sexual violence, including victims of rape in the context of war;”Roll call502 for, 57 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
71Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 86 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 86 – Am 6 Roll call167 for, 449 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
72Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 87 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 87 – Am 7 Roll call218 for, 389 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
73Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 87 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 87 – Am 8 Roll call179 for, 433 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
74Separate vote on paragraph 92 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 92 Roll call427 for, 195 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: Patriots
75Separate vote on paragraph 96 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 96 Roll call413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
76Paragraph 101 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 101/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘regardless of their nationality, place of birth or residence status,’ ‘the Commission to support’”Roll call449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
77Paragraph 101 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 101/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
78Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 105 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 105 – Am 46 Roll call236 for, 382 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
79Vote on text inserted after paragraph 106 Show of hands Rejected
80Vote on text inserted after paragraph 106 Show of hands Rejected
81Vote on text inserted after paragraph 106 Show of hands Rejected
82Vote on text inserted after paragraph 106 Show of hands Rejected
83Vote on text inserted after paragraph 107 Show of hands Rejected
84Paragraph 108 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 108/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including Islamophobia,’”Roll call613 for, 6 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots
85Paragraph 108 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 108/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, Patriots; split: Patriots
86Separate vote on paragraph 122 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 122 – § 59 Roll call149 for, 430 against, 56 abstained Rejected
87Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 122 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 122 – Am 60 Roll call73 for, 443 against, 118 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
88Separate vote on citation 17 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 17 Roll call417 for, 189 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
89Separate vote on citation 27 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 27 Roll call458 for, 144 against, 39 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
90Separate vote on citation 28 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 28 Roll call289 for, 309 against, 41 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, EPP
91Citation 44 — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 44/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including Greece, Hungary and Slovakia’”Roll call433 for, 161 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
92Citation 44 — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 44/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call277 for, 342 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
93Separate vote on citation 45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 45 Roll call421 for, 181 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
94Vote on text inserted after citation 51 Show of hands Rejected
95Vote on text inserted after recital G Show of hands Rejected
96Amendment 10, adding text after recital G A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital G – Am 10 Roll call320 for, 258 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
97Amendment 67 to recital H A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital H – Am 67 Roll call160 for, 432 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
98Amendment 11, adding text after recital L A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital L – Am 11 Roll call76 for, 509 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
99Vote on text inserted after recital L Show of hands Rejected
100Amendment 13 to recital M A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital M – Am 13 Roll call96 for, 524 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
101Separate vote on recital O Show of hands Rejected
102Amendment 47, adding text after recital P A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital P – Am 47 Roll call202 for, 431 against, 2 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
103Amendment 48 to recital S A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital S – Am 48 Roll call171 for, 449 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
104Recital W — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital W/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in several Member States’”Roll call511 for, 77 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
105Recital W — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital W/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call290 for, 286 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
106Separate vote on recital AC A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AC Roll call412 for, 199 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
107Amendment 49 to recital AG A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AG – Am 49 Roll call196 for, 430 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
108Recital AJ — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AJ/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘of the so-called “manosphere”’”Roll call437 for, 180 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP; split: EPP
109Recital AJ — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AJ/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: EPP; split: EPP
110Separate vote on recital AL A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AL Roll call378 for, 197 against, 52 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
111Separate vote on recital AO A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AO Roll call393 for, 197 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
112Recital AP — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AP/1 Part voted on: “whereas total annual anti-gender funding in Europe rose from USD 220 million in 2019 to USD 271 million in 2023, which represents a 23 % increase; whereas a significant portion of the funding driving the growth of anti-gender movements across the EU comes from foreign actors;”Roll call424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP; separate: ECR
113Recital AP — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AP/2 Part voted on: 'whereas the rise of anti-gender and anti-rights movements in the past few years is a result of coordinated transnational efforts with regard to organisation, fundraising and mobilisation; whereas research shows that these movements benefit from funding from a broad range of actors from the far-right of the political spectrum;’Roll call273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP; separate: ECR
114Separate vote on recital AQ A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AQ Roll call423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
115Recital AZ — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AZ/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas these attempts focus mostly on the area of reproductive healthcare and rights, gender identity and legal gender recognition or access to comprehensive sexuality education;’”Roll call351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP; separate: ECR
116Recital AZ — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AZ/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP; separate: ECR
117Recital BB — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BB/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘, or the way the child was conceived’”Roll call439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: EPP
118Recital BB — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BB/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call308 for, 279 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP; split: EPP
119Recital BC — part 1 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BC/1 Part voted on: 'whereas concerns have been raised regarding the fact that discrimination and racism remain widespread across the EU, including in laws and policies, as well as in public institutions such as law enforcement and the justice system; whereas discriminatory law enforcement practices remain a serious concern; whereas racialised groups are disproportionately targeted by stop-and-search procedures, excessive use of force and harassment; whereas oversight and accountability mechanisms remain weak and are hindered by a lack of independent investigations;’Roll call427 for, 195 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots
120Recital BC — part 2 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BC/2 Part voted on: “whereas, at the same time, violence against public officials must be effectively addressed;”Roll call593 for, 22 against, 8 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots
121Separate vote on recital BE Show of hands Adopted
122Amendment 2, adding text after recital BE A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital BE – Am 2 Roll call163 for, 402 against, 45 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
123Separate vote on recital BM A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BM Roll call391 for, 202 against, 31 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ESN
124Separate vote on recital BV A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BV Roll call327 for, 272 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, The Left; separate: Greens
125Final vote — text as a whole A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by The Left, Greens, EPP (12), ECR, Patriots (3) · separate votes by Greens, ECR, Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0042

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2024 and 2025, covering threats to the rule of law, civic space, hate speech, and rights of women and LGBTIQ+ people.

The resolution calls for action to uphold EU values, protect democracy, address rights violations at borders, combat gender-based violence, support civil society, and fight discrimination.

It also highlights risks from digital change and artificial intelligence, and stresses the need to renew democratic foundations and strengthen citizens' participation.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses the state of fundamental rights in the EU in 2024 and 2025, covering democracy, rule of law, media freedom, technology, migration, gender equality, civil society, and discrimination.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2135(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 29 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 10 July 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 23 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 5 March 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 29 April 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Author: Anna STROLENBERG (Greens)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 21 connections: Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Running issue: Rule of law in EU · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Running issue: Rule of law in EU

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025”. Decision, 29 April 2026. votingId 190917, document A-10-2026-0042, reference 2025/2135(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/24 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-29-24,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/24}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/24},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 190917, document A-10-2026-0042, reference 2025/2135(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}