Skip to content

Member

Dominik TARCZYŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
63.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
86.2 %ⓘ of 392 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
16 of 326 votesⓘ
Committees
INTA, JURI
Member id
204346
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

63.5 %

394 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−28.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.2 %

338 of 392 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.9 %

16 of 326 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 9 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

14.7 %

58 of 394 votes cast

Participation 63.5 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI63.5 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 86.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI86.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
28 Apr 2026Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 505 for, 109 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 447 for, 160 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AP — part 2 336 for, 266 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AP — part 1 497 for, 108 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 4, adding text after Recital AL 316 for, 298 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AL — part 2 482 for, 83 against, 77 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AL — part 1 571 for, 33 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AJ — part 2 394 for, 217 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AJ — part 1 468 for, 129 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AC — part 2 325 for, 269 against, 49 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Recital AC — part 1 475 for, 109 against, 68 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Separate vote on citation 16 347 for, 257 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 28 — part 2 459 for, 134 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 28 — part 1 491 for, 111 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 25 — part 2 361 for, 218 against, 60 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 25 — part 1 518 for, 36 against, 100 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 21 — part 2 359 for, 218 against, 62 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 21 — part 1 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 312 for, 321 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 20 — part 2 335 for, 281 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 20 — part 1 431 for, 184 against, 39 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 19 — part 2 369 for, 240 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 19 — part 1 504 for, 116 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 378 for, 213 against, 59 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 3 491 for, 83 against, 63 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 2 496 for, 94 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 12 — part 1 578 for, 37 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 223 for, 343 against, 86 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 4 — part 2 394 for, 227 against, 27 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Paragraph 4 — part 1 492 for, 126 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 2 179 for, 457 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU Amendment 1 180 for, 455 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 377 for, 254 against, 31 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 37 156 for, 405 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135) Final voteAdopted 657 for, 0 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Amendments to Biocidal Products Regulation as regards the extension of certain data protection periods Final votePassed 591 for, 54 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacement Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 566 for, 67 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Final votePassed 459 for, 127 against, 70 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
28 Apr 2026Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 558 for, 35 against, 52 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 139, adding text after Recital 27 171 for, 465 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 251 for, 334 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 127, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 169 for, 441 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 130, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) 188 for, 437 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 502 for, 128 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) 95 for, 551 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Proposal to vote on amendments 412 for, 225 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Proposal to reject the text 39 for, 600 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 389 for, 191 against, 75 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Amendment 66 to paragraph 63 164 for, 466 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
28 Apr 2026Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 349 for, 264 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 25 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland99 % of 3 731 shared81 %
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland99 % of 3 751 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 3 633 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland98 % of 3 687 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 3 491 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland98 % of 3 759 shared81 %
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland98 % of 3 509 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland98 % of 3 629 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland98 % of 3 380 shared81 %
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal72 % of 3 620 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania71 % of 3 459 shared48 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 752 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 566 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 430 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain71 % of 3 146 shared68 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia70 % of 2 177 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia70 % of 3 121 shared62 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain70 % of 2 961 shared68 %
Mieke ANDRIESE PatriotsNetherlands70 % of 1 856 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with IranD-IR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsRapporteurINTA14 Apr 2026
Adjustment of customs duties on the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaRapporteurINTA14 Apr 2026
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People`s Republic of China pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European UnionRapporteurINTA27 Jan 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereigntyOpinion rapporteurINTA1 Dec 2025
EU-US political relationsOpinion rapporteurINTA4 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationD-US2 Jun 2025
Członek Komisji Prawnej, stały sprawozdawca ds. immunitetówRapporteurJURI3 Sept 2024

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

13 contributions recorded; 12 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre SpeechRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
24 Nov 2025Order of business SpeechRead
10 Sept 2025Implementation of EU-US trade deal and the prospect of wider EU trade agreements (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
8 Jul 2025EU-China relations (joint debate) SpeechRead
8 Jul 2025EU-China relations (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Nov 2024Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2024State sponsored terrorism by the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of the recent attacks in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 13 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 64

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
27 Aug 2026The EU’s deadly anti-racism ideology: the death of Henry Nowak E-10-2026-003350Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
14 Jul 2026Transparency and subsidiarity safeguards for LGBTIQ-related funding under AgoraEU and CERV+ E-10-2026-002903Written questionwith 11 co-authors25 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026Risks associated with tariff quota management system in EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2026-002238Written questionwith 22 co-authors27 Jul 2026
15 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on EU-funded media attacking Christian symbols while applying double standards B-10-2026-0184Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
9 Apr 2026EU institutional reform: two-speed Europe, unanimity under threat, and the rise of hidden federalism E-10-2026-001466Written questionwith 13 co-authors23 Jul 2026
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
3 Mar 2026Call for EU action on Iran P-10-2026-000870Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors26 Mar 2026

Show all 64 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 4 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dominik TARCZYŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 204346. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204346?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-204346,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dominik TARCZYŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204346?page=31&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204346. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204346. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}