Member

Marc ANGEL

S&D · Luxembourg

Group: S&D
Country: Luxembourg
Roll-call participation: 96.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 98.7 %ⓘ of 595 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: LSAP Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 7 of 588 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), EMPL, IMCO (substitute)
Member id: 202073

National party: LSAP Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 7 of 588 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), EMPL, IMCO (substitute)
Member id: 202073

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.0 %

595 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+6.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.7 %

587 of 595 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.2 %

7 of 588 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.3 %

2 of 595 votes cast

Participation 96.0 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marc ANGEL	96.0 %
S&D median	89.5 %
Lowest in the group	48.1 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	137

With majority line 98.7 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marc ANGEL	98.7 %
S&D median	97.1 %
Lowest in the group	86.7 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	137

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	4
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	19
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	6
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	5
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	15
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	8
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	0
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	10
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	97 % of 5 314 shared	93 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	97 % of 4 889 shared	93 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	97 % of 5 120 shared	93 %
Select Bruno TOBBACK	Bruno TOBBACK	S&D	Belgium	97 % of 5 492 shared	93 %
Select Sérgio GONÇALVES	Sérgio GONÇALVES	S&D	Portugal	97 % of 5 612 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	97 % of 5 320 shared	93 %
Select Kathleen VAN BREMPT	Kathleen VAN BREMPT	S&D	Belgium	96 % of 5 404 shared	93 %
Select Camilla LAURETI	Camilla LAURETI	S&D	Italy	96 % of 5 645 shared	93 %
Select Javi LÓPEZ	Javi LÓPEZ	S&D	Spain	96 % of 4 514 shared	93 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	96 % of 4 150 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	90 % of 1 672 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	90 % of 4 093 shared	86 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	89 % of 5 420 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	89 % of 5 695 shared	86 %
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Renew	Slovakia	89 % of 5 719 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 4 951 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	89 % of 5 171 shared	86 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	89 % of 5 762 shared	86 %
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Renew	Netherlands	89 % of 4 930 shared	86 %
Select Martin HOJSÍK	Martin HOJSÍK	Renew	Slovakia	89 % of 5 249 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-CL Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Member	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	21 Sept 2026
17th Ordinary Plenary Session of Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (EuroLat)	Official delegation	DLAT	2 Sept 2026
DAND Mission to Bolivia - 20 to 23 July 2026	Official delegation	DAND	19 May 2026
Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (EuroLat) meetings.	Official delegation	DLAT	24 Mar 2026
Establishment of European Business Wallets	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	26 Feb 2026
Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	24 Feb 2025
Report on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	30 Jan 2025
Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace - shaping the future of work	Shadow rapporteur	EMPL	14 Jan 2025
2021/0372(CNS) Laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for Union citizens residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	6 Nov 2024
No dossier named	Quaestor		11 Jul 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

65 contributions recorded, 10 written statements; 7 on behalf of their group; 73 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
14 Sept 2026	Government crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ Community in Türkiye: Türkiye’s compliance with its international commitments on non-discrimination (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
14 Sept 2026	Government crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ Community in Türkiye: Türkiye’s compliance with its international commitments on non-discrimination (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate)	Statement	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Rights, support and protection of victims of crime (debate)	Statement	Read
29 Apr 2026	The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate)	Speech	Read
28 Apr 2026	The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative 'Ban on conversion practices in the European Union' (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	EU enlargement strategy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Jan 2026	Joint action addressing the increased use of death penalty (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 4 min	Read
22 Jan 2026	A new action plan to implement the European Pillar of Social Rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Tackling AI deepfakes and sexual exploitation on social media by making full use of the EU’s digital rules (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	2030 Consumer Agenda (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preventing sexual harassment in public institutions: latest revelations and resignations in Spain and institutional responses (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work on behalf of S&D	Speech · 2 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Protection of minors online (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Nov 2025	Gender Equality Strategy 2025 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
23 Oct 2025	Combating violence against women and girls, including the exploitation of motherhood (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
23 Oct 2025	Combating violence against women and girls, including the exploitation of motherhood (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcement (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	This is Europe - Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 3 min	Read
11 Sept 2025	Summer of heatwaves in the EU: addressing the causes and providing adequate housing and health policies to address record-breaking temperatures (debate)	Statement	Read
9 Jul 2025	Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 Jun 2025	Institutional and political implications of the EU enlargement process and global challenges (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2025	Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2025	The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2025	Improving mental health at work (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2025	The Hungarian government's drift to Russia-style repression: legislative threats to freedom of expression and democratic participation (debate)	Statement	Read

Questions and motions, 56

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
13 Sept 2026	Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
20 Jul 2026	EU-funded Latvian sexuality-education project – non-discrimination compliance and risk of further replication E-10-2026-003056	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Jul 2026	European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	Draft delegated act updating the minimum training requirements for midwives under Directive 2005/36/EC E-10-2026-002727	Written question	11 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
30 Jun 2026	Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698	Written questionwith 43 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
18 Jun 2026	Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	6 Aug 2026
17 Jun 2026	Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	EU funding for institutional care – data and safeguards E-10-2026-002417	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	Not yet answered

Show all 56 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 58

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
2 Sept 2026	Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013	EMPL	33
13 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962	EMPL	15
12 May 2026	Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034 EMPL-AM-788860	EMPL	5
21 Apr 2026	Establishment of European Business Wallets IMCO-AM-787760	IMCO	48
24 Mar 2026	Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 EMPL-AM-786727	EMPL	17
24 Mar 2026	Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 EMPL-AM-786760	EMPL	51
4 Mar 2026	Motion for a resolution on the need to reduce work-related fatalities EMPL-AM-785245	EMPL	33
3 Mar 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 EMPL-AM-785262	EMPL	14
3 Mar 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 EMPL-AM-785221	EMPL	28
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784309	CJ40	18

Show all 58 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Luxembourg National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202073?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marc ANGEL”. Member record. memberId 202073. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202073?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/202073. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/202073?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-202073,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marc ANGEL}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202073?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202073?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 202073. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/202073. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 56

Amendments tabled in committee, 58

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928