Skip to content

Member

Liudas MAŽYLIS

EPP · Lithuania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
99.8 %ⓘ of 572 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.4 %ⓘ of 571 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
TS-LKD Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai
In office
Since 5 Dec 2024
Against clear line
3 of 539 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO (substitute), AFET (substitute), DEVE
Member id
197841
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.8 %

571 of 572 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+9.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.4 %

562 of 571 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.6 %

3 of 539 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

5 of 571 votes cast

Participation 99.8 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Liudas MAŽYLIS99.8 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 98.4 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Liudas MAŽYLIS98.4 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 97 to Article 1 197 for, 433 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 60 to Article 1 — part 4 464 for, 161 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 96 to Article 1 189 for, 443 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 88 to Article 1 195 for, 443 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 95 to Article 1 216 for, 412 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 112 for, 479 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 206 for, 427 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 94 to Article 1 195 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 36 to Article 1 444 for, 176 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 32 to Article 1 518 for, 97 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 103 to Article 1 90 for, 522 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 31 to Article 1 544 for, 75 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 92 to Article 1 220 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 84 to Article 1 199 for, 431 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 91 to Article 1 214 for, 408 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 90 to Article 1 162 for, 406 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 82 541 for, 81 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 81 548 for, 74 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 11 471 for, 161 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final votePassed 437 for, 144 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Proposal to reject the text 159 for, 458 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Motion for adjournment of vote 174 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final votePassed 417 for, 154 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 118 for, 422 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 117 for, 414 against, 97 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 117 for, 414 against, 101 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 158 for, 401 against, 75 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 132 for, 434 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 142 for, 427 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 104 for, 456 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 62 for, 536 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 56 for, 530 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 110 for, 466 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 65 for, 526 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 49, adding text after recital 1 97 for, 493 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 48, adding text after recital 1 58 for, 515 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 61 to Article 3 108 for, 480 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to reject the text 160 for, 462 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Motion for adjournment of vote 185 for, 437 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final voteFailed 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 247 for, 301 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 29 to Article 1 344 for, 236 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 31 to Article 1 304 for, 306 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 33 to Article 1 125 for, 394 against, 115 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 36, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 325 for, 298 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 35, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 210 for, 312 against, 114 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 307 for, 306 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 303 for, 314 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Combating corruption Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 581 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Combating corruption Proposal to vote on amendments 179 for, 446 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 67 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 327 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania97 % of 4 237 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania97 % of 4 703 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 4 369 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 4 416 shared89 %
Niels GEUKING EPPGermany97 % of 5 430 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 3 266 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania97 % of 4 954 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 4 230 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 5 225 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 885 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 789 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 5 297 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania86 % of 4 077 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 180 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 4 208 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 4 260 shared82 %
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance86 % of 1 942 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 769 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium85 % of 4 928 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember16 Dec 2024now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Need for a long-term EU development cooperation strategy to face challenges in education in developing countriesShadow rapporteurDEVE22 Sept 2026
EU strategy to face the new theories against democracyShadow rapporteur for an opinionDEVE12 Dec 2025
Mission to Yerevan, Armenia in connection with the 12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PA, 28-30 October, 2025.\nOfficial delegationDEPA9 Oct 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

51 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 66 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 73

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
9 Jun 2026Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380Written questionwith 15 co-authors21 Aug 2026

Show all 73 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070 CJ1937
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789071 CJ1911
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789072 CJ1914
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789067 CJ1918
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068 CJ1920
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789069 CJ1943
22 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697 AFET21
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346 AFET15
10 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Moldova AFET-AM-786967 AFET21
19 Mar 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 DEVE-AM-785438 DEVE38

Show all 25 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Liudas MAŽYLIS”. Member record. memberId 197841. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197841?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197841,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Liudas MAŽYLIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197841. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}