Decision
Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act
- Effect
- Adopted
- Result
- show of hands — no count
- Date
- 30 April 2026, 13:30–13:32
- Kind
- Resolution
More facts (8)
- Dossier
- 2026/2596(RSP)
- Source
- Motion for a resolution
- Topics
- Economy & single marketDigital, AI & data Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 19 votes · 6 roll calls · 6 amendments
- Requested by
- The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 1 split vote)
- Sitting
- Thursday 30 April 2026
- Final vote
- 191924
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Show of hands — no count
Adopted.
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (1 adopted, 5 rejected) and 12 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 7 rejected).
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christel SCHALDEMOSE Denmark | S&D | Speeches1 | 30 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | no roll call |
| Victor NEGRESCU Romania | S&D | Speeches3 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | no roll call |
| Lukas MANDL Austria | EPP | Speeches2 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | no roll call |
| Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN Spain | Patriots | Speeches2 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | no roll call |
| Petra STEGER Austria | Patriots | Speeches2 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | no roll call |
| Anna STROLENBERG Netherlands | Greens | Speeches2 | 28 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | no roll call |
Show the other 40 speakers
All votes on this decision, 19
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 B10-0190/2026 – § 2 – Am 9 | Roll call | 136 for, 401 against, 42 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR |
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 3 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected |
Show the other 18 votesShow the other 16 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 3 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 | Counted | 108 for, 437 against, 34 abstained Rejected | |
| 5 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 B10-0190/2026 – After § 3 – Am 3 | Roll call | 186 for, 326 against, 56 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 6 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 7 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 10 B10-0190/2026 – After § 10 – Am 7 | Roll call | 186 for, 383 against, 6 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 8 | Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘further marginalising competing services and reducing consumers’ ability to make independent choices’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 9 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 10 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 14 B10-0190/2026 – After § 14 – Am 6 | Roll call | 399 for, 104 against, 75 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 11 | Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure sufficient human and financial resources for DMA enforcement, in line with the Regulation’s scope, complexity and strategic importance,’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 12 | Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and calls for a significant reinforcement of staffing;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 13 | Separate vote on paragraph 29 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 14 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 15 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 30 B10-0190/2026 – After § 30 – Am 13 | Roll call | 188 for, 394 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR |
| 16 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 30 B10-0190/2026 – After § 30 – Am 14 | Roll call | 167 for, 375 against, 28 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR |
| 17 | Vote on text inserted after recital J | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 18 | Vote on text inserted after recital N | Counted | 185 for, 385 against, 12 abstained Rejected | |
| 19 | Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Show of hands | Adopted |
Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, ECR, Patriots · split votes by ECR, Patriots.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted a resolution on enforcing the Digital Markets Act, which sets EU rules for large online platforms acting as gatekeepers.
The text reaffirms that effective, timely and consistent enforcement is essential for the single market and for benefits to consumers, businesses and innovators.
It also expresses concern about political pressure from third countries to weaken the DMA and calls for continued rigorous application.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament's resolution on enforcing the Digital Markets Act reaffirms the need for effective, timely and consistent enforcement and calls on the Commission to use all available tools, address specific gatekeeper practices, and ensure the DMA keeps pace with AI and cloud developments.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2026/2596(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject
Parliament adopted the text on 30 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
Show the 3 steps of the dossier
- Tabled for plenary (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 30 April 2026 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: IMCO · Authors: Andreas SCHWAB (EPP), Anna CAVAZZINI (Greens)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
No connections found for this decision.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act”. Decision, 30 April 2026. votingId 191924, document B-10-2026-0190, reference 2026/2596(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-30-10,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-04-30},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/10}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/10},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 191924, document B-10-2026-0190, reference 2026/2596(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}