Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena

Effect
Adopted
Result
355 for · 86 against · 7 abstained roll call
Date
18 May 2026, 18:12
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting
Monday 18 May 2026
Final vote
192714
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

The agenda was changed.

Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left and Greens.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 0No vote 10 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 40Abst. 2No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 71Against 5Abst. 1No vote 59 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 34 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 107Against 0Abst. 1No vote 75 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 14Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 3No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 12

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria122150.70
Belgium113080.68
Bulgaria7019—
Cyprus0006—
Czechia161130.83
Germany35171430.49
Denmark105000.50
Estonia1006—
Spain3471180.71
Finland83040.59
France48130200.68
Greece105060.50
Croatia7104—
Hungary140051.00
Ireland30011—
Italy29110360.59
Lithuania5105—
Luxembourg4002—
Latvia3015—
Malta0006—
Netherlands216040.67
Poland3310190.96
Portugal72012—
Romania1310190.89
Sweden125040.56
Slovenia3204—
Slovakia90150.85

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 448 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena Roll call355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-18/1
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena”. Decision, 18 May 2026. votingId 192714. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-18/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-18-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-18/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-18/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 192714. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}