Skip to content

Decision

Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions

Effect
Adopted
Result
404 for · 102 against · 67 abstained roll call
Date
30 April 2026, 13:27
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Topics
EU budget & fundsJobs, social affairs & equality Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
12 votes · 1 roll call
Requested by
Members (4 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
190658
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 11 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 3 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 6No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 119Against 2Abst. 7No vote 57 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 1Against 38Abst. 32No vote 10 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 27Against 32Abst. 12No vote 14 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.18
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 9Against 8Abst. 8No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 17

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria116030.47
Belgium153220.63
Bulgaria93050.63
Cyprus1005—
Czechia65910.17
Germany58149150.57
Denmark92310.46
Estonia6100—
Spain3642180.79
Finland110041.00
France6713100.92
Greece460110.40
Croatia5106—
Hungary650100.32
Ireland130011.00
Italy33128140.30
Lithuania73100.45
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia2115—
Malta0006—
Netherlands177430.41
Poland2425040.27
Portugal132240.65
Romania175290.56
Sweden144030.67
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia82140.59

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Pina PICIERNO changed group ItalyRenewSpeeches330 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christophe HANSEN LuxembourgEPPSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Not in office
Camilla LAURETI ItalyS&DSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sabrina REPP GermanyS&DSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Joachim STREIT GermanyRenewSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriotsSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Show the other 37 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Giusi PRINCI ItalyEPPSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPPSpeeches230 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mathilde ANDROUËT FrancePatriotsSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Cristina MAESTRE SpainS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ana MIRANDA PAZ SpainGreensSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESNSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Elisabeth GROSSMANN AustriaS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Valérie DEVAUX FranceRenewSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN FrancePatriotsSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESNSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Siegbert Frank DROESE GermanyESNSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sebastian EVERDING GermanyThe LeftSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreensSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA SpainS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Estrella GALÁN SpainThe LeftSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Catarina MARTINS PortugalThe LeftSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES PortugalS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sérgio GONÇALVES PortugalS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECRSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo groupSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Cristina GUARDA ItalyGreensSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nina CARBERRY IrelandEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenewSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT SpainEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gabriel MATO SpainEPPSpeeches130 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 12

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that gender budgeting enables the identification and correction of funding gaps that disadvantage women entrepreneurs, particularly in rural, island and outermost regions;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
2Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted262 for, 291 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
3Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Recalls that, in its special report no 10/21 on gender mainstreaming in the EU budget, the European Court of Auditors found that the Commission had not adequately implemented gender mainstreaming and had made insufficient use of sex-disaggregated data and indicators; highlights, in particular, that the European Court of Auditors regretted that the CAP direct payments system left “no scope for positive action regarding women” and noted that there was “a clear need for a gender analysis of income support paid to farmers through direct payments, including income distribution and its relation with land ownership, eligible land, and recipients of payments”; notes that, as women’s farms are on average smaller than men’s, a surface-based direct payment system necessarily disadvantages women farmers; is deeply concerned that next to no improvements have been made in this regard, neither in the current CAP, nor in the draft published on 16 July 2025;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
Show the other 11 votesShow the other 9 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted262 for, 291 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
3Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Recalls that, in its special report no 10/21 on gender mainstreaming in the EU budget, the European Court of Auditors found that the Commission had not adequately implemented gender mainstreaming and had made insufficient use of sex-disaggregated data and indicators; highlights, in particular, that the European Court of Auditors regretted that the CAP direct payments system left “no scope for positive action regarding women” and noted that there was “a clear need for a gender analysis of income support paid to farmers through direct payments, including income distribution and its relation with land ownership, eligible land, and recipients of payments”; notes that, as women’s farms are on average smaller than men’s, a surface-based direct payment system necessarily disadvantages women farmers; is deeply concerned that next to no improvements have been made in this regard, neither in the current CAP, nor in the draft published on 16 July 2025;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to implement gender-responsive budgeting across all of its programmes to ensure women and men benefit equally from public spending, including under the CAP;”Counted278 for, 289 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
5Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘rights and’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
6Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
7Separate vote on paragraph 71 Show of hands Adopted
8Separate vote on paragraph 87 Counted253 for, 322 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
9Recital C — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights’ and ‘including access to safe and legal abortion care’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
10Recital C — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “and rights”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
11Recital C — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “including access to safe and legal abortion care”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
12Final vote — text as a whole A10-0058/2026 – Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted

split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0058

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on women's entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions, addressing barriers such as access to finance, childcare, transport, and digital infrastructure.

The text calls for gender mainstreaming across rural development, cohesion, digital, and agricultural policies, and for collecting gender-disaggregated data.

It urges the Commission and member states to ensure post-2027 funding for women's entrepreneurship under CAP, Horizon Europe, and Digital Europe.

The resolution also highlights the need for accessible support systems for victims of gender-based violence in rural areas.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses women's entrepreneurship in rural, island, mountainous, and outermost regions. It calls for improved access to funding, education, digital infrastructure, and support services, and for gender mainstreaming across EU policies and budgets.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2124(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 30 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 26 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 13 April 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 30 April 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: FEMM · Author: Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy · Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions”. Decision, 30 April 2026. votingId 190658, document A-10-2026-0058, reference 2024/2124(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 30 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-30/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-30-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-30},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-30/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 190658, document A-10-2026-0058, reference 2024/2124(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-30-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-30 (CC BY 4.0)}
}