Skip to content

Member

Nils UŠAKOVS

S&D · Latvia

Group
S&D
Country
Latvia
Roll-call participation
88.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.2 %ⓘ of 549 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
Saskaņa SDP "Saskaņa" sociāldemokrātiskā partija
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
18 of 543 votesⓘ
Committees
BUDG, PETI (vice-chair), TRAN (substitute)
Member id
197810
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.5 %

549 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−1.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.2 %

528 of 549 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.3 %

18 of 543 votes where their group had a clear line

16 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 549 votes cast

Participation 88.5 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Nils UŠAKOVS88.5 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 96.2 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Nils UŠAKOVS96.2 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 97 to Article 1 197 for, 433 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 60 to Article 1 — part 4 464 for, 161 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 96 to Article 1 189 for, 443 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 88 to Article 1 195 for, 443 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 95 to Article 1 216 for, 412 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 112 for, 479 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 206 for, 427 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 94 to Article 1 195 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 36 to Article 1 444 for, 176 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 32 to Article 1 518 for, 97 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 103 to Article 1 90 for, 522 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 31 to Article 1 544 for, 75 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 92 to Article 1 220 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 84 to Article 1 199 for, 431 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 91 to Article 1 214 for, 408 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 90 to Article 1 162 for, 406 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 82 541 for, 81 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 81 548 for, 74 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 11 471 for, 161 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final votePassed 437 for, 144 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Proposal to reject the text 159 for, 458 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Motion for adjournment of vote 174 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final votePassed 417 for, 154 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 118 for, 422 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 117 for, 414 against, 97 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 117 for, 414 against, 101 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 158 for, 401 against, 75 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 132 for, 434 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 142 for, 427 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 104 for, 456 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 62 for, 536 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 56 for, 530 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 110 for, 466 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 65 for, 526 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 49, adding text after recital 1 97 for, 493 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 48, adding text after recital 1 58 for, 515 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 61 to Article 3 108 for, 480 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to reject the text 160 for, 462 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Motion for adjournment of vote 185 for, 437 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final voteFailed 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 247 for, 301 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 29 to Article 1 344 for, 236 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 31 to Article 1 304 for, 306 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 33 to Article 1 125 for, 394 against, 115 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 36, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 325 for, 298 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 35, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 210 for, 312 against, 114 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 34, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 307 for, 306 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 303 for, 314 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Combating corruption Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 581 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Combating corruption Proposal to vote on amendments 179 for, 446 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan NICA S&DRomania94 % of 3 123 shared93 %
Vasile DÎNCU S&DRomania93 % of 4 604 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania93 % of 4 748 shared93 %
Krzysztof ŚMISZEK S&DPoland93 % of 4 407 shared93 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal93 % of 4 965 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain93 % of 4 685 shared93 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal93 % of 4 076 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal93 % of 4 641 shared93 %
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES S&DPortugal92 % of 4 376 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal92 % of 4 459 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly91 % of 1 516 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg89 % of 4 698 shared86 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 4 519 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania88 % of 4 704 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia88 % of 4 539 shared86 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance88 % of 4 709 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia88 % of 4 720 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia88 % of 4 299 shared86 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium88 % of 4 910 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance88 % of 4 806 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA DelegationChair3 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and LanguagesIG10-25 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202422 Jul 2024
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA DelegationMember19 Sept 20242 Oct 2024

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedRapporteurPETI19 May 2026
Union Civil Protection Mechanism and Union support for health emergency preparedness and response, and repealing Decision No 1313/2013/EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG20 Apr 2026
Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG18 Mar 2026
Establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionBUDG18 Mar 2026
No dossier namedRapporteurBUDG11 Dec 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - CommissionShadow rapporteur for an opinionTRAN27 Nov 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteur for an opinionTRAN18 Nov 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - AgenciesShadow rapporteur for an opinionTRAN13 Nov 2025
No dossier namedTrilogue negotiatorBUDG23 Oct 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurPETI11 Jun 2025

Show all 22 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

15 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 24 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 15 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 5

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Feb 2025The role of the EU in protecting minority rights E-10-2025-000549Written questionwith 22 co-authors5 Jun 2025
26 Nov 2024Reconsideration of the Rail Baltica project E-10-2024-002657Written question30 Jan 2025
16 Oct 2024Fund for the protection and development of the frontier regions of countries bordering Ukraine, Belarus and Russia E-10-2024-002090Written questionwith 36 co-authors10 Jan 2025
11 Oct 2024Housing crisis in the EU – urgent need to repeal Directive 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings E-10-2024-002029Written questionwith 54 co-authors27 Nov 2024

Show all 5 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 33

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
1 Jul 2026Draft amending budget no 2 to the general budget 2026 - update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure BUDG-AM-790749 BUDG7
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790159 CJ712
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790157 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093 CJ713
22 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790089 CJ711
24 Mar 2026Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament BUDG-AM-786719 BUDG1

Show all 33 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nils UŠAKOVS”. Member record. memberId 197810. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197810?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197810. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197810?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197810,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Nils UŠAKOVS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197810?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197810?page=35&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197810. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197810. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}