Skip to content

Member

Dragoş BENEA

S&D · Romania

Group
S&D
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
65.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
94.6 %ⓘ of 406 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
21 of 403 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON (substitute), REGI (chair)
Member id
197658
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

65.5 %

406 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−24.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.6 %

384 of 406 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−2.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

5.2 %

21 of 403 votes where their group had a clear line

17 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

6 of 406 votes cast

Participation 65.5 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dragoş BENEA65.5 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 94.6 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dragoş BENEA94.6 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Final votePassed 503 for, 57 against, 108 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 224 for, 424 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 362 for, 259 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 259 to recital 4 197 for, 454 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 227 for, 299 against, 138 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 187 to Article 23 527 for, 121 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 178 to Article 22 529 for, 120 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 170 to Article 21 525 for, 123 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 250 to Article 16, after paragraph 2 141 for, 516 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 325 for, 284 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 164 450 for, 205 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 163 528 for, 123 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 162 494 for, 152 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 159 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 158 492 for, 159 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Proposal to reject the text 44 for, 600 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 438 for, 37 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on recital H 455 for, 88 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 54 for, 483 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 9 86 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 429 for, 76 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 2 441 for, 94 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 1 451 for, 43 against, 65 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 385 for, 97 against, 78 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 450 for, 93 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 219 for, 337 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 204 for, 359 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 227 for, 346 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 227 for, 348 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 196 for, 367 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 217 for, 365 against, 1 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 386 for, 184 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 6, adding text after recital G 189 for, 376 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 5, adding text after recital G 187 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 4, adding text after recital F 181 for, 384 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 3, adding text after recital C 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 1, adding text after recital B 200 for, 382 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 183 for, 388 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 170 for, 386 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 40 414 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 39 411 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 179 for, 396 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 199 for, 372 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 28 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Claudiu MANDA S&DRomania99 % of 1 770 shared93 %
Gabriela FIREA S&DRomania99 % of 2 470 shared93 %
Gheorghe CÂRCIU S&DRomania99 % of 2 439 shared93 %
Mihai TUDOSE S&DRomania99 % of 2 841 shared93 %
Ştefan MUŞOIU S&DRomania99 % of 2 997 shared93 %
Victor NEGRESCU S&DRomania98 % of 3 084 shared93 %
Andi CRISTEA S&DRomania98 % of 3 151 shared93 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania96 % of 2 663 shared93 %
Vasile DÎNCU S&DRomania95 % of 3 191 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania94 % of 3 370 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly92 % of 1 157 shared86 %
Pina PICIERNO changed group RenewItaly90 % of 203 shared86 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance90 % of 1 676 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania89 % of 3 227 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance89 % of 3 066 shared86 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance89 % of 3 207 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia89 % of 3 161 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance89 % of 3 503 shared86 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance89 % of 2 755 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium89 % of 2 736 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeChair23 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202422 Jul 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperationShadow rapporteurREGI24 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurREGI1 Dec 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewRapporteurREGI10 Jun 2025
Report named: Opinion on BUDG INI report on a a revamped long -term budgetOpinion rapporteurREGI18 Nov 2024
BUDG own - initiative reportShadow rapporteur for an opinionREGI22 Oct 2024
No dossier namedCommittee chairREGI22 Jul 2024

Show all 6 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

5 contributions recorded; 10 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 5 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 4

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Show all 4 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057 REGI10
7 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058 REGI7
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI17
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI3
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790097 CJ712
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098 CJ714
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099 CJ7113
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100 CJ716
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101 CJ713
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102 CJ719

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dragoş BENEA”. Member record. memberId 197658. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197658?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197658. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197658?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197658,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dragoş BENEA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197658?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197658?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197658. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197658. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}