Skip to content

Decision

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Effect
Adopted
Result
404 for · 208 against · 20 abstained roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:02–13:06
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Nela Riehl
Topics
Economy & single marketJobs, social affairs & equality Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
32 votes · 13 roll calls · 9 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
186089
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (2 adopted, 7 rejected) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 16 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 7Abst. 4No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.62
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 15Abst. 4No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 145Against 9Abst. 8No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 2No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 14Abst. 2No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 50

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria108020.33
Belgium146110.50
Bulgaria103220.50
Cyprus3111—
Czechia513120.53
Germany5928350.48
Denmark93210.46
Estonia5101—
Spain3980130.74
Finland121200.70
France33223230.35
Greece126120.45
Croatia100110.86
Hungary27012—
Ireland93020.63
Italy4231030.36
Lithuania83000.59
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia5400—
Malta4011—
Netherlands1812010.40
Poland2425040.27
Portugal183000.79
Romania227040.64
Sweden910020.29
Slovenia7011—
Slovakia102120.65

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches111 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN DenmarkGreensSpeeches210 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nela RIEHL GermanyGreensSpeeches210 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roxana MÎNZATU RomaniaS&DSpeeches210 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Not in office
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Markus FERBER GermanyEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 20 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Stefan BERGER GermanyEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Damian BOESELAGER GermanyGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Manon AUBRY FranceThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Ivars IJABS LatviaRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Dan-Ştefan MOTREANU RomaniaEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Angelika WINZIG AustriaEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Konstantinos ARVANITIS GreeceThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Thomas BAJADA MaltaS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESNSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Marlena MALĄG PolandECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Hristo PETROV BulgariaRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESNSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Anouk VAN BRUG NetherlandsRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Younous OMARJEE FranceThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Enikő GYŐRI HungaryPatriotsSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Marie TOUSSAINT FranceGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For

All votes on this decision, 32

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
Show the other 31 votesShow the other 29 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 3 – Am 8 Roll call313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D
5Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
6Amendment 20 to paragraph 5 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 5 – Am 20 Roll call165 for, 461 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
7Separate vote on paragraph 5 Counted325 for, 280 against, 28 abstained Adopted
8Separate vote on paragraph 6 Show of hands Rejected
9Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 6 – Am 11 Roll call299 for, 293 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
10Separate vote on paragraph 7 Show of hands Rejected
11Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7 Show of hands Rejected
12Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7 Counted276 for, 302 against, 52 abstained Rejected
13Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 8 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 8 – Am 15 Roll call267 for, 278 against, 88 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
14Amendment 21 to paragraph 9 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 9 – Am 21 Roll call196 for, 410 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
15Separate vote on paragraph 9 Show of hands RejectedRequested byseparate: EPP
16Vote on text inserted after paragraph 15 Show of hands Rejected
17Paragraph 17 — part 1 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’ and ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’”Roll call434 for, 173 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
18Paragraph 17 — part 2 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/2 Part voted on: “the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits”Roll call287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
19Paragraph 17 — part 3 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/3 Part voted on: “and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;”Roll call282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP
20Amendment 22 to paragraph 19 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 19 – Am 22 Roll call190 for, 438 against, 5 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
21Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 19 – Am 23 Roll call192 for, 429 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
22Separate vote on paragraph 20 Show of hands RejectedRequested byseparate: EPP
23Separate vote on paragraph 20 Counted342 for, 261 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: EPP
24Amendment 24 to paragraph 22 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 22 – Am 24 Roll call187 for, 430 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
25Paragraph 23 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Underlines that the European Semester recommendations in 2026 will be crucial in shaping the next multiannual financial framework; believes that reforms and investments should be selected for their efficiency and effectiveness in addressing the relevant country-specific recommendations; warns that if EU funding is to be tied to Semester guidance, that guidance must be socially balanced in full alignment with the EPSR, and regional and local actors must play an important role in the disbursement of funds; notes with concern, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal for social spending, which risks diluting focus on employment and social objectives’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
26Paragraph 23 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and calls for a stand-alone and reinforced ESF+ with thematic concentrations;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
27Amendment 19 to recital B A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – Recital B – Am 19 Roll call176 for, 446 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
28Separate vote on recital C Show of hands Rejected
29Separate vote on recital C Show of hands Rejected
30Vote on text inserted after recital G Show of hands Rejected
31Separate vote on recital H Show of hands Rejected
32Final vote — text as a whole A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, Patriots · split votes by EPP (2) · separate votes by EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0033

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its resolution on employment and social priorities for the 2026 European Semester, setting out its position on coordinating economic, employment and social policies across the EU.

The text calls for stronger integration of social objectives into EU economic governance, with the European Pillar of Social Rights at its core, and for measurable social targets to guide country-specific recommendations.

It also urges an ambitious EU anti-poverty strategy, action on child poverty, and investment in people, including education, training and affordable housing, to address labour shortages and support sustainable growth.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution sets out Parliament's employment and social priorities for the 2026 European Semester. It calls for stronger integration of social objectives into EU economic governance, full implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, and a balanced approach supporting competitiveness, sustainability, and social justice.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2183(INI) · Own-initiative report

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities – annual report 2026

Parliament adopted the text on 11 March 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 9 October 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 25 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 27 February 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 11 March 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: EMPL · Author: Nela RIEHL (Greens)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: European Pillar of Social Rights · Running issue: European Semester · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: European Pillar of Social Rights

Running issue: European Semester

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Decision, 11 March 2026. votingId 186089, document A-10-2026-0033, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-11-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186089, document A-10-2026-0033, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}