Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 to paragraph 19

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Vote
Amendment 22 to paragraph 19
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
190 for · 438 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:05
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 19 – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2026-0033
Dossier
2025/2183(INI)
Vote id
188621
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 190 for, 438 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 120Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 2No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 9Against 154Abst. 0No vote 21 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 2No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 62Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 6Abst. 1No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France080
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 633 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 583 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 587 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 577 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 425 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 585 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital B Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment200 for, 382 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 519 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 83 to recital 1 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment195 for, 465 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 554 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 582 voters
21 May 2025Request by the PfE Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.97 412 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188621
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 22 to paragraph 19 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188621, reference 2025/2183(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188621 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188621,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 to paragraph 19 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188621}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188621},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188621, reference 2025/2183(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}