Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 32

EU enlargement strategy

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 32
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2026
Result
301 for · 300 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 4 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members, Renew
Official label
A10-0016/2026 – Petras Auštrevičius – § 32
Text
Report A-10-2026-0016
Dossier
2025/2110(INI)
Vote id
188630
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 301 for, 300 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 11Against 23Abst. 9No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 10Abst. 6No vote 16 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
RenewFor 59Against 7Abst. 3No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
EPPFor 78Against 77Abst. 4No vote 25 of 184Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
ECRFor 4Against 71Abst. 2No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 23 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 26Abst. 0No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany211
Denmark100
Spain120
Finland300
France080
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy208
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 625 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 3 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote321 for, 270 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 554 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote320 for, 291 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 560 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote334 for, 278 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.79 555 voters
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaSplit vote345 for, 295 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 569 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote329 for, 277 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 565 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on citation 11 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote320 for, 280 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 565 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 564 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 84 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSeparate vote335 for, 272 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 550 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilSeparate vote329 for, 286 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188630
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 32 — EU enlargement strategy”. Vote, 11 March 2026. votingId 188630, reference 2025/2110(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188630 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-11-188630,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 32 — EU enlargement strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188630}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-11/188630},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188630, reference 2025/2110(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}