Skip to content

Member

Luke Ming FLANAGAN

The Left · Ireland

Group
The Left
Country
Ireland
Roll-call participation
82.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
89.7 %ⓘ of 506 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 86.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
Ind. Independent
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
16 of 424 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, IMCO (substitute), PECH (substitute)
Member id
124985
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

82.6 %

512 of 620 final votes while in office

The Left median: 86.9 % (−4.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

89.7 %

454 of 506 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 86.6 % (+3.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.8 %

16 of 424 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 9 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

15.8 %

81 of 512 votes cast

Participation 82.6 % — The Left median 86.9 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Luke Ming FLANAGAN82.6 %
The Left median86.9 %
Lowest in the group37.7 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members47
With majority line 89.7 % — The Left median 86.6 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Luke Ming FLANAGAN89.7 %
The Left median86.6 %
Lowest in the group64.5 %
Highest in the group91.8 %
Members47
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Final votePassed 377 for, 279 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 24 to recital 23 208 for, 465 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 29, adding text after recital 4 184 for, 479 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 28, adding text after recital 2 125 for, 536 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 27 to Article 6, paragraph 1, after point e 205 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 26 to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 205 for, 460 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 8 432 for, 202 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 605 for, 68 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement: cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 619 for, 9 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 192 for, 446 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 518 for, 104 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Agreements on Financial Mechanisms for the period May 2021 - April 2028 (EEA: EU-Iceland-Liechtenstein-Norway; Norwegian: EU-Norway); Additional Protocols to EEC-Norway Agreement and to EEC-Iceland Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 528 for, 121 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 441 for, 173 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 42 181 for, 477 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 41 216 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 28 to paragraph 39 198 for, 434 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 36 115 for, 485 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 34 187 for, 469 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 33 149 for, 486 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 32 179 for, 490 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 31 90 for, 579 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Paragraph 31 — part 3 497 for, 135 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 28 130 for, 505 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 28 132 for, 474 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 97 for, 525 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 43 to paragraph 27 96 for, 484 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 195 for, 468 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 193 for, 472 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 186 for, 484 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 191 for, 472 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 25 118 for, 522 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 137 for, 478 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 143 for, 478 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 25 309 for, 304 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 24 182 for, 466 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 412 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 22 118 for, 549 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 125 for, 524 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 145 for, 529 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 326 for, 315 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 337 for, 311 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 252 for, 381 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 127 for, 497 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 481 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 75 for, 519 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 20 106 for, 523 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 191 for, 463 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 19 372 for, 279 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 189 for, 471 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 308 for, 309 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 16 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Martin GÜNTHER The LeftGermany95 % of 2 307 shared87 %
Rudi KENNES The LeftBelgium94 % of 4 506 shared87 %
Özlem DEMIREL The LeftGermany93 % of 3 874 shared87 %
Catarina MARTINS The LeftPortugal93 % of 3 911 shared87 %
Irene MONTERO The LeftSpain92 % of 4 174 shared87 %
Estrella GALÁN The LeftSpain92 % of 3 852 shared87 %
Martin SCHIRDEWAN The LeftGermany92 % of 4 338 shared87 %
Ilaria SALIS The LeftItaly92 % of 3 994 shared87 %
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ The LeftSpain92 % of 3 030 shared87 %
Pernando BARRENA ARZA The LeftSpain91 % of 3 162 shared87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ana MIRANDA PAZ GreensSpain84 % of 3 610 shared77 %
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ GreensSpain83 % of 4 408 shared77 %
Benedetta SCUDERI GreensItaly82 % of 4 412 shared77 %
Cristina GUARDA GreensItaly82 % of 3 930 shared77 %
Leoluca ORLANDO GreensItaly81 % of 3 910 shared77 %
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ GreensSpain81 % of 3 485 shared77 %
Ignazio Roberto MARINO GreensItaly81 % of 3 455 shared77 %
David CORMAND GreensFrance81 % of 4 456 shared77 %
Saskia BRICMONT GreensBelgium81 % of 4 203 shared77 %
Marie TOUSSAINT GreensFrance81 % of 4 303 shared77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER DelegationVice-chair3 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember11 Mar 2025now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER DelegationMember19 Sept 20242 Oct 2024

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI17 Jun 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesShadow rapporteur for an opinionPECH15 Apr 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurPECH4 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteurAGRI22 Jan 2026
Laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI22 Jan 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurAGRI15 Jan 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 as regards data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penaltiesShadow rapporteurAGRI14 Oct 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI10 Oct 2025
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other partShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI10 Oct 2025
Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projectsShadow rapporteurIMCO15 Jul 2025

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 36 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
7 Jul 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2026Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
11 Feb 2026Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Recent peace agreement in the Middle East and the role of the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 24

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up B-10-2026-0388Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
7 Jul 2026Transparency regarding EU-funded infrastructure destroyed in Gaza E-10-2026-002805Written questionwith 39 co-authors4 Sept 2026
24 Jun 2026ECB’s decision to raise interest rates and its impact on the rising cost of living O-10-2026-000028Oral questionwith 39 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on holding Israel to account for breaches of human rights and international law B-10-2026-0267Motion for a resolutionwith 55 co-authors—
7 May 2026EU-Mercosur agreement: exposure of the European market to the JBS Group and the risks of geoeconomic dependence in agricultural supply chains E-10-2026-001890Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jun 2026
25 Mar 2026Safety and labelling of citrus fruit treatments E-10-2026-001266Written question10 Jun 2026
23 Mar 2026EU action to prevent krill populations from collapsing E-10-2026-001188Written questionwith 16 co-authors29 Apr 2026
9 Mar 2026Public procurement and deaths at work: choosing the best bidder in social terms and making social rights and safety at work a condition for access to contracts O-10-2026-000011Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Feb 2026Sharp decline in EU milk prices and possible activation of a voluntary milk production reduction scheme E-10-2026-000668Written question15 Apr 2026

Show all 24 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 73

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI18
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI12
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI21
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI20
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI15
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919 AGRI12
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917 AGRI14
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI23
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918 AGRI23

Show all 73 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

  • Delegation Ireland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Luke Ming FLANAGAN”. Member record. memberId 124985. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124985?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124985. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124985?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124985,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Luke Ming FLANAGAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124985?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124985?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124985. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124985. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}