Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.3 %ⓘ of 574 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
0 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.6 %

574 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+0.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.3 %

570 of 574 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

19 of 574 votes cast

Participation 92.6 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE92.6 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.3 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE99.3 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 28 432 for, 190 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 17 to paragraph 28 163 for, 450 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Paragraph 27 — part 2 411 for, 209 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Paragraph 27 — part 1 418 for, 183 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 24 421 for, 203 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 16 to paragraph 24 177 for, 451 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 22 453 for, 168 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 19 445 for, 188 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 13 425 for, 171 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 15 to paragraph 13 187 for, 444 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 194 for, 439 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 13 to paragraph 10 171 for, 445 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 225 for, 415 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 12 to paragraph 7 151 for, 443 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 4 422 for, 199 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 11 to paragraph 4 191 for, 443 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 182 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Separate vote on paragraph 2 408 for, 213 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 184 for, 450 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 186 for, 447 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded Amendment 1 184 for, 441 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 457 for, 148 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
25 Nov 2025European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) Proposal to vote on amendments 87 for, 542 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings; enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimes Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 556 for, 74 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) Proposal to reject the text 116 for, 490 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
25 Nov 2025Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposal Decision to maintain the action 334 for, 294 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
24 Nov 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Gaza Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Gaza 173 for, 244 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
24 Nov 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution) Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) 301 for, 103 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
24 Nov 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE and ECR groups – Ukraine (debate) Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew, Verts/ALE and ECR groups — Ukraine (debate) 424 for, 0 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 310 for, 222 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on recital AC 276 for, 317 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on recital Z 293 for, 269 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital M — part 3 331 for, 220 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital M — part 2 379 for, 134 against, 80 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital M — part 1 476 for, 41 against, 92 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on recital I 355 for, 191 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on recital H 298 for, 239 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital G — part 2 254 for, 335 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital G — part 1 493 for, 8 against, 101 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital D — part 3 289 for, 289 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital D — part 2 347 for, 170 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Recital D — part 1 404 for, 176 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Paragraph 87 — part 2 362 for, 163 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Paragraph 87 — part 1 411 for, 187 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 86 273 for, 324 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 84 269 for, 313 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 83 272 for, 320 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 3 359 for, 167 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 2 299 for, 246 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 1 406 for, 176 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}