Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.3 %ⓘ of 574 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
0 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.6 %

574 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+0.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.3 %

570 of 574 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

19 of 574 votes cast

Participation 92.6 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE92.6 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.3 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE99.3 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 344 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 346 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 36 158 for, 398 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Separate vote on paragraph 35 551 for, 12 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 36 to paragraph 22 208 for, 264 against, 94 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 35 to paragraph 21 205 for, 262 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 198 for, 354 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 2 306 for, 225 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Paragraph 9 — part 1 422 for, 83 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 30 to paragraph 9 158 for, 374 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 191 for, 371 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 27 to paragraph 6 187 for, 380 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward Amendment 25 to paragraph 3 198 for, 366 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Rights, support and protection of victims of crime Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 49 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 87 for, 415 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 480 for, 5 against, 83 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 3 to paragraph 7 296 for, 252 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 184 for, 348 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 142 for, 380 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 155 for, 382 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 295 for, 189 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 181 for, 338 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 516 for, 14 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 185 for, 371 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 184 for, 368 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 106 for, 386 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 165 for, 386 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 2 435 for, 113 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Paragraph 11 — part 1 502 for, 41 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 180 for, 383 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 195 for, 355 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 347 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 178 for, 379 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 72 for, 459 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in Iran Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 240 for, 312 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
21 May 2026Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package) Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 369 for, 126 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 347 for, 165 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 10, adding text after recital D 187 for, 440 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 201 for, 438 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 25 451 for, 145 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 11 464 for, 134 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on citation 7 426 for, 192 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Separate vote on paragraph 21 465 for, 122 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 2 463 for, 151 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 19 — part 1 572 for, 37 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Paragraph 15 — part 2 635 for, 4 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 May 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 184 for, 454 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=20&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}