Member

Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA

EPP · Poland

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 95.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 90.8 %ⓘ of 589 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 23 of 548 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, FEMM (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 96791

National party: KO Koalicja Obywatelska
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 23 of 548 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, FEMM (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 96791

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.0 %

589 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+4.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.8 %

535 of 589 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−4.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.2 %

23 of 548 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 8 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

9 of 589 votes cast

Participation 95.0 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	95.0 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 90.8 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	90.8 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 5 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	6
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	3
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	0
12 Feb 2025	4	0
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	6
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	0
7 May 2025	20	19
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	5
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	6
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	9
9 Oct 2025	10	9
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	15
25 Nov 2025	13	12
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	7
24 Feb 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	11
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	10
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	14
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	EPP	Poland	98 % of 5 259 shared	89 %
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 095 shared	89 %
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 573 shared	89 %
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 233 shared	89 %
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	EPP	Poland	96 % of 4 989 shared	89 %
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 506 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 103 shared	89 %
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 433 shared	89 %
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 462 shared	89 %
Select Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 253 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 5 070 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 3 866 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	84 % of 4 944 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 5 417 shared	82 %
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	Renew	France	83 % of 2 919 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 048 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	83 % of 3 399 shared	75 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	83 % of 4 513 shared	82 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 5 125 shared	82 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	83 % of 5 203 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP Delegation	Vice-chair	3 Oct 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working group	Member	29 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
18th EU-Mongolia Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on 27-29 May 2026	Official delegation	DCAS	6 May 2026
Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869	Opinion rapporteur	ENVI	9 Mar 2026
Establishing Global Europe	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	FEMM	13 Feb 2026
EP delegation to the Conciliation Committee on Air Passenger Rights 2013/0072(COD)	Trilogue negotiator		13 Feb 2026
Air Transport Agreement and Ancillary Agreement on the application of the Air Transport Agreement, between the United States of America, the EU and its Member States, Iceland and Norway	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	6 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	FEMM	21 Jul 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 as regards data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties	Opinion rapporteur	ENVI	26 Jun 2025
Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions	Rapporteur	FEMM	4 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	D-JP	27 Sept 2024
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	27 Sept 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

32 contributions recorded, 4 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 46 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
6 Jul 2026	Air passenger rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Air passenger rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 32 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 32

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jun 2026	Recognition of obesity as a chronic disease under EU public health policy E-10-2026-002516	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	24 Aug 2026
9 Jun 2026	Chinese tomato concentrate imports: protecting EU producers and food security P-10-2026-002375	Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors	13 Jul 2026
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
24 Feb 2026	Ensuring risk assessment as the basis for proportionate regulation of cosmetic products E-10-2026-000762	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	16 Apr 2026
18 Feb 2026	Inspections to ensure regulatory conformity of cosmetic products in the single market with the Cosmetic Products Regulation E-10-2026-000687	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	Not yet answered
18 Feb 2026	Checks on the presence of prohibited substances and trace impurities in non-EU cosmetic products entering the single market E-10-2026-000688	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	21 May 2026
13 Feb 2026	Commission proceedings concerning complaint CPLT(2023)02625 on Poland’s restrictions on pharmacy ownership E-10-2026-000645	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	26 Mar 2026
9 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on World Cancer Day B-10-2026-0141	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060	Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors	—

Show all 32 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 67

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	29
28 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123	ENVI	3
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	5
20 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790834	ENVI	8
1 Jul 2026	Connecting Europe through high-speed rail TRAN-AM-790790	TRAN	43
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790158	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790155	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790159	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790103	CJ71	1

Show all 67 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96791?roles=all&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA”. Member record. memberId 96791. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96791?roles=all&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96791. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96791?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-96791,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96791?roles=all&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96791?roles=all&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96791. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96791. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 32

Amendments tabled in committee, 67

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928