Skip to content

Member · Former member

Bas EICKHOUT

Greens · Netherlands · left on 20 June 2026

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
88.9 %ⓘ of 548 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.8 %ⓘ of 487 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (4)
National party
GL-PvdA GroenLinks-PvdA
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 20 Jun 2026 (left on 20 June 2026)
Against clear line
0 of 475 votesⓘ
Member id
96725
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.9 %

487 of 548 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (−3.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.8 %

486 of 487 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+3.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 475 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

19 of 487 votes cast

Participation 88.9 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Bas EICKHOUT88.9 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.8 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Bas EICKHOUT99.8 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 283

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
21 Jan 2026Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 336 for, 262 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 8 208 for, 436 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2026Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 198 for, 383 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of a Loan for Ukraine Final voteConsent given 499 for, 135 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b 304 for, 302 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 565 for, 83 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2026Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026 225 for, 402 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2026Air passenger rights Amendments 1 + 243 (voted as one) 632 for, 15 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026Adopted 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 2, adding text after recital G 499 for, 112 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea 212 for, 421 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea 589 for, 51 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 349 for, 287 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 14 543 for, 59 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a 205 for, 439 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a 194 for, 441 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a 207 for, 431 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a 347 for, 277 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5 350 for, 277 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 169 for, 440 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 5 to paragraph 3 202 for, 442 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 417 for, 234 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital M 645 for, 8 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 1 to recital H 189 for, 461 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital G 420 for, 198 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital F — part 2 428 for, 204 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital C 645 for, 14 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital B — part 2 427 for, 212 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 198 for, 441 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 195 for, 439 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 3 — part 3 379 for, 216 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 202 for, 445 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 2 419 for, 193 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 1 645 for, 12 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 444 for, 153 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Paragraph 10 — part 2 325 for, 290 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 491 for, 83 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 420 for, 207 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 10, adding text after recital F 207 for, 425 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 3 to recital F 187 for, 436 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 2 to recital E 178 for, 454 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 1 to recital A 288 for, 294 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 175 for, 455 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 32, adding text after recital E 190 for, 450 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 31, adding text after recital C 193 for, 464 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Separate vote on citation 2 491 for, 139 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 30 to citation 2 199 for, 445 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 162 for, 484 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 124 for, 500 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 74 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium99 % of 4 028 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 3 918 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland99 % of 3 931 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany98 % of 4 456 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany98 % of 4 697 shared94 %
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany98 % of 4 358 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany98 % of 4 711 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany98 % of 4 507 shared94 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands98 % of 4 687 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 3 784 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 048 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 195 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 626 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 732 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 291 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands87 % of 4 298 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 3 455 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany87 % of 3 921 shared83 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance87 % of 4 603 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 23 on behalf of their group; 69 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
11 Feb 2026Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 4 minRead
27 Nov 2025Outcome of the UN Climate Change Conference - Belém (COP30) (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
13 Nov 2025Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
22 Oct 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Oct 2025Request for waiver of immunity Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 29 October 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 as regards technical provisions, long-term guarantee measures, own funds, equity risk, spread risk on securitisation positions, other standard formula capital requirements, reporting and disclosure, proportionality and group solvency B-10-2026-0056Motion for a resolution—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
11 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 4 July 2025 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards the simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486 as regards simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives B-10-2025-0566Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
9 Dec 2025Committee for Socio-economic Analysis opinion delays and implications for the adoption of the EU-wide PFAS restriction E-10-2025-004861Written questionwith 9 co-authors16 Feb 2026
23 Oct 2025Sliding scale for steel (Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the proposed industrial decarbonisation accelerator act) E-10-2025-004184Written questionwith 18 co-authors19 Dec 2025
26 Sept 2025Energy dimension of the EU-US trade deal E-10-2025-003743Written questionwith 17 co-authors4 Dec 2025
8 Jul 2025PFAS limits and TFA in drinking water P-10-2025-002764Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors22 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025Enabling a financial framework to support the circular economy in the EU E-10-2025-002292Written questionwith 16 co-authors18 Aug 2025
5 Jun 2025Protecting retail investors against predatory investment firms selling misleading financial products offering poor value for money E-10-2025-002287Written question31 Jul 2025

Show all 12 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
11 Nov 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2025 ECON-AM-779370 ECON46
20 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ECON-AM-773048 ECON63
11 Dec 20242023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Commission ENVI-AM-766861 ENVI1
13 Nov 2024European Central Bank – annual report 2024 ECON-AM-765337 ECON34

Show all 4 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bas EICKHOUT”. Member record. memberId 96725. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96725?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96725,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bas EICKHOUT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=37&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96725. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}