Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 2

Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 2
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
325 for · 290 against · 31 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 4 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0257/2025 – Leire Pajín – § 10/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0257
Dossier
2025/2085(INI)
Vote id
183400
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 1Abst. 1No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 52Against 12Abst. 2No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.68
EPPFor 43Against 105Abst. 20No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 2No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain100
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland100
Italy900
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Paragraph 67 — part 2 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSplit vote321 for, 272 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 591 voters
17 Jun 2025Paragraph 66 — part 2 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSplit vote327 for, 250 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 592 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.84 607 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 343 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 596 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.84 551 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 582 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 352 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 606 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 542 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 582 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183400, reference 2025/2085(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183400,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183400},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183400, reference 2025/2085(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}