Skip to content

Member

Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ

S&D · Spain

Group
S&D
Country
Spain
Roll-call participation
92.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.5 %ⓘ of 575 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSOE Partido Socialista Obrero Español
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
1 of 569 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), PETI
Member id
28298
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.7 %

575 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+3.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.5 %

572 of 575 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+2.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.2 %

1 of 569 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 575 votes cast

Participation 92.7 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ92.7 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 99.5 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ99.5 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 503 for, 56 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 139 for, 491 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 27 59 for, 561 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 25 626 for, 18 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 41 to paragraph 23 438 for, 158 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 22 420 for, 158 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 211 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 18 88 for, 508 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 12 499 for, 96 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 98 for, 538 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 96 for, 498 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 617 for, 15 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 127 for, 473 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 328 for, 281 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 28 to paragraph 9 106 for, 524 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 8 116 for, 501 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 6 96 for, 510 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 6 125 for, 510 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 482 for, 70 against, 103 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 6 113 for, 524 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 5 621 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 19 to paragraph 2 107 for, 510 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Union designs (codification) Final votePassed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 224 for, 396 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Proposal to vote on amendments 206 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Proposal to reject the text 220 for, 396 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Feb 2026Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel 171 for, 217 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine 278 for, 121 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital T 429 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 2 405 for, 155 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 1 421 for, 150 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 2 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 1 419 for, 158 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 2 398 for, 164 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 1 426 for, 151 against, 31 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 2 328 for, 237 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 1 425 for, 147 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital K 406 for, 149 against, 50 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 2 327 for, 235 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 1 422 for, 107 against, 73 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 412 for, 171 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 430 for, 157 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 2 334 for, 259 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain99 % of 4 670 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal99 % of 4 807 shared93 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal99 % of 5 317 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal99 % of 5 084 shared93 %
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES S&DPortugal99 % of 4 769 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain99 % of 3 756 shared93 %
Camilla LAURETI S&DItaly99 % of 5 330 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania99 % of 5 185 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain99 % of 4 633 shared93 %
Marta TEMIDO S&DPortugal98 % of 4 955 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia90 % of 4 689 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance90 % of 4 857 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium90 % of 4 081 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 110 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg90 % of 5 082 shared86 %
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly90 % of 1 728 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania90 % of 5 110 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 397 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia90 % of 4 896 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance90 % of 5 028 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

62 contributions recorded; 51 on behalf of their group; 214 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 7

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
28 Apr 2026Compatibility of the principle of ‘national priority’ with EU law E-10-2026-001720Written questionwith 19 co-authors1 Jul 2026
8 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Gaza at the breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release the hostages and to move towards a two-state solution B-10-2025-0372Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
3 Sept 2025Prostitution and the system of national and regional accounts: in contradiction to the EU’s fundamental principles E-10-2025-003381Written questionwith 1 co-author11 Nov 2025
13 Dec 2024Impacts of quartz mining in north-east Segovia and its alignment with EU strategic policies E-10-2024-002938Written questionwith 1 co-author14 Mar 2025
18 Nov 2024Scarcity of water resources and Quintanilla de Flórez bottling plant E-10-2024-002568Written questionwith 1 co-author11 Feb 2025
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors—

Show all 7 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Spain National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ”. Member record. memberId 28298. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28298?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28298. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28298?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-28298,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28298?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28298?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28298. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28298. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}