Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 65, after paragraph 56

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Vote
Amendment 65, after paragraph 56
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 28 Apr 2026
Result
184 for · 448 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 82 of 88 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 56 – Am 65
Text
Report A-10-2026-0044
Dossier
2025/2246(BUI)
Vote id
191233
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 184 for, 448 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 68Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 2Against 154Abst. 3No vote 26 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 70Against 2Abst. 3No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 9No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 10Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France070
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1 to recital E Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment184 for, 458 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 600 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 31, adding text after recital C The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.97 599 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 642 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 365 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 620 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 116, adding text after recital 36 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment185 for, 480 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 604 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 586 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 102, adding text after paragraph 53 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment178 for, 463 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 599 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 126 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment173 for, 477 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 606 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191233
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 65, after paragraph 56 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Vote, 28 April 2026. votingId 191233, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191233 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-28-191233,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 65, after paragraph 56 — Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191233}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-28/191233},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191233, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}