Skip to content

Decision

Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU

Effect
Adopted
Result
447 for · 160 against · 43 abstained roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 14:07–14:13
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus
Topics
Jobs, social affairs & equalityJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
31 votes · 31 roll calls · 6 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call) · Members (11 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
189914
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (2 adopted, 4 rejected) and 24 parts of the text voted on separately (24 adopted).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 146Against 6Abst. 11No vote 22 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 4Against 60Abst. 10No vote 7 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 13No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 7No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 46

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium173020.78
Bulgaria75320.20
Cyprus5100—
Czechia621210.40
Germany7315350.70
Denmark131100.80
Estonia6100—
Spain457080.80
Finland131010.89
France4133160.32
Greece164010.70
Croatia6114—
Hungary69060.40
Ireland140001.00
Italy4021690.40
Lithuania63110.40
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia4131—
Malta1023—
Netherlands196330.52
Poland2424050.25
Portugal171120.84
Romania225150.68
Sweden153120.68
Slovenia5220—
Slovakia84210.36

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA SpainPatriotsSpeeches327 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Alexander SELL GermanyESNSpeeches327 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches327 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches327 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Evin INCIR SwedenS&DSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 51 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Abir AL-SAHLANI SwedenRenewSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Manon AUBRY FranceThe LeftSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javier ZARZALEJOS SpainEPPSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECRSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Mathilde ANDROUËT FrancePatriotsSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Irene MONTERO SpainThe LeftSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group LuxembourgNo groupSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenewSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&DSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Elena DONAZZAN ItalyECRSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Cecilia STRADA ItalyS&DSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECRSpeeches227 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Maria NOICHL GermanyS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriotsSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Alice KUHNKE SwedenGreensSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Irena JOVEVA SloveniaRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Assita KANKO BelgiumECRSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Elena KOUNTOURA GreeceThe LeftSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Billy KELLEHER IrelandRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Diana RIBA I GINER SpainGreensSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria WALSH IrelandEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON FinlandRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Katri KULMUNI FinlandRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marianne VIND DenmarkS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Elisabeth DIERINGER AustriaPatriotsSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
András LÁSZLÓ HungaryPatriotsSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Gabriella GERZSENYI HungaryEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Valérie DEVAUX FranceRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Emma RAFOWICZ FranceS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mélissa CAMARA FranceGreensSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESNSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo groupSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Verena MERTENS GermanyEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Anna STROLENBERG NetherlandsGreensSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ SpainThe LeftSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sigrid FRIIS DenmarkRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECRSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo groupSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreensSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ IrelandRenewSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA PolandEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT SpainEPPSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Evelyn REGNER AustriaS&DSpeeches127 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 31

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call180 for, 455 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots, S&D, Renew
2Amendment 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2 Roll call179 for, 457 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D, Renew
3Paragraph 4 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to eradicate all the manifestations of the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality’”Roll call492 for, 126 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
Show the other 30 votesShow the other 28 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2 Roll call179 for, 457 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D, Renew
3Paragraph 4 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to eradicate all the manifestations of the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality’”Roll call492 for, 126 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 4 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 4/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call394 for, 227 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
5Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – After § 7 – Am 3 Roll call223 for, 343 against, 86 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Renew
6Paragraph 12 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 12/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights’ and ‘and access to safe and legal abortion’”Roll call578 for, 37 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
7Paragraph 12 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 12/2 Part voted on: “and rights”Roll call496 for, 94 against, 55 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
8Paragraph 12 — part 3 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 12/3 Part voted on: “and access to safe and legal abortion”Roll call491 for, 83 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
9Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 16 – Am 5 Roll call378 for, 213 against, 59 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Renew
10Paragraph 19 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 19/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘as well as ending the systemic and structural deficiencies that foster a societal sense of impunity for rape and allow the perpetrators of sexual violence to go unpunished’”Roll call504 for, 116 against, 33 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
11Paragraph 19 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 19/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call369 for, 240 against, 40 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
12Paragraph 20 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 20/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘further calls on the Commission to closely monitor the Member States’ implementation of these guidelines and publish an assessment thereof before the end of the current term;’”Roll call431 for, 184 against, 39 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
13Paragraph 20 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 20/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call335 for, 281 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
14Amendment 6 to paragraph 21 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21 – Am 6 Roll call312 for, 321 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Renew
15Paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘that contribute to the prevalent complex set of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality’”Roll call444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
16Paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 21/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
17Paragraph 25 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 25/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and eradicating the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality in our society’”Roll call518 for, 36 against, 100 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
18Paragraph 25 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 25/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call361 for, 218 against, 60 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
19Paragraph 28 — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 28/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and sexual and reproductive rights’”Roll call491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
20Paragraph 28 — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – § 28/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call459 for, 134 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
21Separate vote on citation 16 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Visa 16 Roll call347 for, 257 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
22Recital AC — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AC/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas widespread impunity for rape contributes to the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women, creating an environment in which sexual violence is normalised and justified through persistent gender inequalities and harmful attitudes about gender and sexuality;’”Roll call475 for, 109 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
23Recital AC — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AC/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call325 for, 269 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
24Recital AJ — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AJ/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the prevalent complex of beliefs and social norms that encourage male sexual aggression and support violence against women,’”Roll call468 for, 129 against, 55 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
25Recital AJ — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AJ/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call394 for, 217 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
26Recital AL — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AL/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘safe and legal abortion, and’”Roll call571 for, 33 against, 48 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
27Recital AL — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AL/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call482 for, 83 against, 77 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
28Amendment 4, adding text after Recital AL A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – After Recital AL – Am 4 Roll call316 for, 298 against, 33 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Renew
29Recital AP — part 1 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AP/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and unhealthy and harmful models of masculinity and questioning entitlement-based views of sex is crucial for prevention efforts’”Roll call497 for, 108 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
30Recital AP — part 2 A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Recital AP/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call336 for, 266 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
31Final vote — text as a whole A10-0047/2026 – Evin Incir, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Members (11) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0047

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU, calling for legal definitions of rape to centre on the absence of consent.

The resolution highlights that most rapes are committed by known persons and that victims may freeze, so lack of physical resistance does not imply consent.

It urges member states to align their laws with the Istanbul Convention and to train justice professionals in trauma-informed approaches.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

A resolution on the importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU calls on the Commission to propose an EU-wide definition of rape based on freely given, informed, withdrawable consent, and urges Member States to align national laws with this standard.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2040(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 28 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 13 February 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 25 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 11 March 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 28 April 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Authors: Evin INCIR (S&D), Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 15 connections: Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU”. Decision, 28 April 2026. votingId 189914, document A-10-2026-0047, reference 2025/2040(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/11 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-28-11,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/11}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/11},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 189914, document A-10-2026-0047, reference 2025/2040(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}