Skip to content

Decision

Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III

Effect
Adopted
Result
389 for · 191 against · 75 abstained roll call
Date
28 April 2026, 13:38–13:51
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Nils Ušakovs
Topics
EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
88 votes · 51 roll calls · 42 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
191239
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 42 amendments (5 adopted, 37 rejected) and 34 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 29 rejected).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 36Abst. 5No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 0Abst. 9No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 66Against 3Abst. 2No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 153Against 0Abst. 9No vote 23 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 1Against 34Abst. 41No vote 5 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 6No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 1Against 25Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 3Against 22Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 37

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium134320.47
Bulgaria113120.60
Cyprus4200—
Czechia641010.25
Germany6428040.54
Denmark93300.40
Estonia6010—
Spain429270.69
Finland101310.57
France3241260.32
Greece109110.25
Croatia91020.85
Hungary290100.73
Ireland111200.68
Italy31172080.18
Lithuania81110.70
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia4131—
Malta1023—
Netherlands127930.14
Poland2525030.25
Portugal174000.71
Romania222540.64
Sweden85620.13
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia67110.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Antonella SBERNA ItalyECRSpeeches128 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches211 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Nils UŠAKOVS LatviaS&DSpeeches211 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Younous OMARJEE FranceThe LeftSpeeches210 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Daniel FREUND GermanyGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Romana JERKOVIĆ CroatiaS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Show the other 25 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Romana TOMC SloveniaEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Tilly METZ LuxembourgGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Moritz KÖRNER GermanyRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Rasmus ANDRESEN GermanyGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Veronika VRECIONOVÁ CzechiaECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA SpainEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Eero HEINÄLUOMA FinlandS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Georgios AFTIAS GreeceEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ondřej DOSTÁL CzechiaNo groupSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
András LÁSZLÓ HungaryPatriotsSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Jean-Marc GERMAIN FranceS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Rosa SERRANO SIERRA SpainS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Hélder SOUSA SILVA PortugalEPPSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Dick ERIXON SwedenECRSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Pierfrancesco MARAN ItalyS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreensSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Julien SANCHEZ FrancePatriotsSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Enikő GYŐRI HungaryPatriotsSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against

All votes on this decision, 88

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 58 to paragraph 1 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 1 – Am 58 Roll call206 for, 438 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
2Separate vote on paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 1 – Am 45 Roll call99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
Show the other 87 votesShow the other 85 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 1 – Am 45 Roll call99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 1 – Am 46 Roll call116 for, 527 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
5Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
6Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
7Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 4 – Am 8 Roll call185 for, 439 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
8Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 4 – Am 60 Roll call178 for, 430 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
9Amendment 55 to paragraph 7 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 7 – Am 55 Roll call71 for, 540 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
10Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 7 – Am 9 Roll call147 for, 460 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
11Separate vote on paragraph 9 Show of hands Rejected
12Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 10 – Am 10 Roll call226 for, 412 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
13Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 10 – Am 47 Roll call105 for, 525 against, 23 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
14Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 10 – Am 67 Roll call218 for, 432 against, 2 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
15Separate vote on paragraph 15 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: ESN
16Amendment 57 to paragraph 16 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 16 – Am 57 Roll call119 for, 473 against, 66 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
17Separate vote on paragraph 17 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: ESN
18Separate vote on paragraph 18 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: ESN
19Vote on text inserted after paragraph 18 Show of hands Rejected
20Separate vote on paragraph 19 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: ESN
21Vote on text inserted after paragraph 19 Show of hands Rejected
22Vote on text inserted after paragraph 19 Show of hands Rejected
23Compromise amendment Counted435 for, 153 against, 67 abstained Adopted
24Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
25Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
26Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
27Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
28Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
29Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
30Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
31Compromise amendment Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
32Compromise amendment Show of hands Lapsed
33Compromise amendment Show of hands Lapsed
34Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 24 – Am 13 Roll call142 for, 441 against, 65 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
35Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 24 – Am 14 Roll call208 for, 433 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
36Vote on text inserted after paragraph 24 Show of hands Rejected
37Amendment 61 to paragraph 26 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 26 – Am 61 Roll call167 for, 455 against, 29 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ESN
38Amendment 70 to paragraph 26 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 26 – Am 70 Roll call223 for, 405 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
39Amendment 1 to paragraph 26 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 26 – Am 1 Roll call375 for, 263 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
40Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 26 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 26 – Am 16 Roll call214 for, 434 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
41Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 26 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 26 – Am 44 Roll call228 for, 404 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR, S&D
42Amendment 71 to paragraph 27 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 27 – Am 71 Roll call214 for, 411 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
43Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 27 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 27 – Am 17 Roll call187 for, 451 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
44Vote on text inserted after paragraph 27 Show of hands Adopted
45Separate vote on paragraph 28 Show of hands Rejected
46Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28 Show of hands Rejected
47Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28 Show of hands Rejected
48Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28 Show of hands Rejected
49Separate vote on paragraph 29 Show of hands Rejected
50Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29 Show of hands Rejected
51Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 29 – Am 22 Roll call188 for, 456 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
52Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29 Show of hands Rejected
53Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands Rejected
54Amendment 74 to paragraph 30 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 30 – Am 74 Roll call194 for, 429 against, 27 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
55Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 30 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 30 – Am 23 Roll call186 for, 443 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
56Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 30 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 30 – Am 41 Roll call183 for, 419 against, 44 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
57Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30 Show of hands Rejected
58Amendment 3 to paragraph 34 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 34 – Am 3 Roll call406 for, 223 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, EPP
59Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34 Show of hands Rejected
60Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 34 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 34 – Am 25 Roll call182 for, 432 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
61Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34 Show of hands Rejected
62Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34 Show of hands Rejected
63Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 37 – Am 27 Roll call208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
64Separate vote on paragraph 38 Show of hands Rejected
65Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39 Show of hands Rejected
66Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39 Show of hands Rejected
67Amendment 4 to paragraph 40 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 40 – Am 4 Roll call356 for, 278 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
68Amendment 5 to paragraph 40 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 40 – Am 5 Roll call370 for, 266 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
69Vote on text inserted after paragraph 42 Show of hands Rejected
70Vote on text inserted after paragraph 42 Show of hands Rejected
71Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 43 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 43 – Am 51 Roll call118 for, 531 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
72Vote on text inserted after paragraph 45 Show of hands Rejected
73Amendment 63 to paragraph 46 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 46 – Am 63 Roll call122 for, 504 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
74Vote on text inserted after paragraph 46 Show of hands Rejected
75Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 48 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 48 – Am 52 Roll call149 for, 465 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
76Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 50 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 50 – Am 53 Roll call142 for, 471 against, 30 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
77Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 50 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 50 – Am 54 Roll call73 for, 475 against, 103 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
78Vote on text inserted after paragraph 52 Show of hands Rejected
79Amendment 76 to paragraph 56 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 56 – Am 76S Roll call224 for, 410 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
80Amendment 64 to paragraph 56 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 56 – Am 64 Roll call185 for, 442 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ESN
81Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 56 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 56 – Am 33 Roll call203 for, 439 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
82Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 56 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 56 – Am 65 Roll call184 for, 448 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
83Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 57 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – After § 57 – Am 34 Roll call203 for, 445 against, 5 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
84Vote on text inserted after paragraph 57 Show of hands Rejected
85Amendment 77 to paragraph 58 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 58 – Am 77S Roll call187 for, 447 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
86Amendment 6 to paragraph 60 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 60 – Am 6 Roll call349 for, 264 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
87Amendment 66 to paragraph 63 A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – § 63 – Am 66 Roll call164 for, 466 against, 17 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
88Final vote — text as a whole A10-0044/2026 – Nils Ušakovs – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Greens, EPP · separate votes by ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0044

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on the 2027 EU budget, the final year of the current multiannual financial framework, focusing on delivery for people, the economy and the planet.

The adopted text calls for a robust, investment-oriented budget that boosts competitiveness, supports a socially fair transition, and addresses security and defence needs.

It also urges member states to speed up the use of remaining EU funds and asks for adequate resources for social, employment, and industrial policies.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution sets Parliament's guidelines for the 2027 EU budget, the final year of the current multiannual financial framework. It calls for a budget focused on delivery, competitiveness, social cohesion, security, and climate action, with adequate funding for programmes and support for vulnerable groups.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2246(BUI) · Procedure type BUI

Guidelines for the 2027 Budget - Section III

Parliament adopted the text on 28 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 5 March 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 5 March 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 28 April 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: BUDG · Author: Nils UŠAKOVS (S&D)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 20 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Running issue: Annual budget procedure · Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Running issue: Annual budget procedure

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. Decision, 28 April 2026. votingId 191239, document A-10-2026-0044, reference 2025/2246(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-28/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-28-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-28/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 191239, document A-10-2026-0044, reference 2025/2246(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}