Member

Manfred WEBER

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 81.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 99.0 %ⓘ of 508 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (4)

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 2 of 473 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 2 of 473 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.9 %

508 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−8.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.0 %

503 of 508 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 473 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 508 votes cast

Participation 81.9 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Manfred WEBER	81.9 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 99.0 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Manfred WEBER	99.0 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
21 Jan 2026	EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026	225 for, 402 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2026	Air passenger rights Amendments 1 + 243 (voted as one)	632 for, 15 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026	Adopted 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 2, adding text after recital G	499 for, 112 against, 41 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea	212 for, 421 against, 15 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea	589 for, 51 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 12 to paragraph 22	349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 14	543 for, 59 against, 41 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a	205 for, 439 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a	194 for, 441 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a	207 for, 431 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a	347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5	350 for, 277 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4	169 for, 440 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 5 to paragraph 3	202 for, 442 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital M	645 for, 8 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 1 to recital H	189 for, 461 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital G	420 for, 198 against, 43 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital F — part 2	428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital C	645 for, 14 against, 0 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital B — part 2	427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12	198 for, 441 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	195 for, 439 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 3 — part 3	379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3	202 for, 445 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 2	419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 1	645 for, 12 against, 0 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Paragraph 10 — part 2	325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 10, adding text after recital F	207 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 3 to recital F	187 for, 436 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 2 to recital E	178 for, 454 against, 20 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 1 to recital A	288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10	175 for, 455 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 32, adding text after recital E	190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 31, adding text after recital C	193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Separate vote on citation 2	491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 30 to citation 2	199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 27 to paragraph 41	162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 35 to paragraph 40	124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 26 to paragraph 40	136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37	191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29	79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14	81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14	78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	0
8 Oct 2024	1	0
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	4
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	0
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	0
8 May 2025	12	0
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	13
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	3
23 Oct 2025	5	0
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	12
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	0
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	0
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	16
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	0
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	14
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	12
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	99 % of 2 852 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 200 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 795 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 567 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 098 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 481 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 286 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 182 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 620 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 306 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 221 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	89 % of 4 044 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	89 % of 3 370 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	89 % of 3 629 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	89 % of 4 474 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	88 % of 4 563 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 124 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 4 489 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 174 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 470 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 26 on behalf of their group; 127 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 5 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	European Council meeting (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	Order of business on behalf of EPP	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate)	Speech · 3 min	Read

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
19 Sept 2024	Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	17 Dec 2024
17 Jul 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007	Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 Mar 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 as regards certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countries AGRI-AM-785380	AGRI	8

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=50&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Manfred WEBER”. Member record. memberId 28229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=50&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28229?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-28229,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Manfred WEBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=50&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=50&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28229. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 2

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928