Decision
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
- Effect
- Adopted
- Result
- 367 for · 166 against · 84 abstained roll call
- Date
- 10 March 2026, 13:17–14:02
- Kind
- Resolution
More facts (9)
- Margin
- by a clear majority
- Dossier
- 2025/2070(INI)
- Source
- Committee report by Borja Giménez Larraz
- Topics
- Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 260 votes · 154 roll calls · 80 amendments
- Requested by
- The Left (1 roll call, 8 split votes) · Greens (1 roll call, 10 split votes) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (2 split votes) · EPP (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call, 15 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 30 split votes) · ESN (1 roll call, 2 split votes)
- Sitting
- Tuesday 10 March 2026
- Final vote
- 186515
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained (roll call).
Adopted by a clear majority.
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 80 amendments (3 adopted, 77 rejected) and 179 parts of the text voted on separately (147 adopted, 32 rejected).
Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Greens, Patriots and ESN.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 0 | Against 36 | Abst. 1 | No vote 9 of 46 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.96 | |
| Greens | For 0 | Against 37 | Abst. 9 | No vote 7 of 53 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.71 | |
| S&D | For 97 | Against 2 | Abst. 22 | No vote 14 of 135 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.70 | |
| Renew | For 62 | Against 4 | Abst. 3 | No vote 7 of 76 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.85 | |
| EPP | For 147 | Against 5 | Abst. 8 | No vote 26 of 186 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.88 | |
| ECR | For 42 | Against 9 | Abst. 21 | No vote 7 of 79 | Majority line For | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.38 | |
| Patriots | For 9 | Against 41 | Abst. 14 | No vote 20 of 84 | Majority line Against | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.46 | |
| ESN | For 0 | Against 22 | Abst. 2 | No vote 4 of 28 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.88 | |
| No group | For 10 | Against 10 | Abst. 4 | No vote 7 of 31 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 56
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
The Left line Against · 1 abstained of 37 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Sebastian EVERDING Germany
Greens line Against · 9 abstained of 46 who voted
Abstained (9)
- Alexandra GEESE Germany
- Anna CAVAZZINI Germany
- Catarina VIEIRA Netherlands
- Daniel FREUND Germany
- Erik MARQUARDT Germany
- Hannah NEUMANN Germany
- Kim VAN SPARRENTAK Netherlands
- Martin HÄUSLING Germany
- Tineke STRIK Netherlands
S&D line For · 2 voted against, 22 abstained of 121 who voted
Voted against (2)
- Csaba MOLNÁR Hungary
- Klára DOBREV Hungary
Abstained (22)
- Aurore LALUCQ France
- Biljana BORZAN Croatia
- Chloé RIDEL France
- Christophe CLERGEAU France
- Claire FITA France
- Emma RAFOWICZ France
- Eric SARGIACOMO France
- Estelle CEULEMANS Belgium
- François KALFON France
- Jean-Marc GERMAIN France
- Lara WOLTERS Netherlands
- Marit MAIJ Netherlands
- Marko VEŠLIGAJ Croatia
- Mohammed CHAHIM Netherlands
- Murielle LAURENT France
- Nora MEBAREK France
- Pierre JOUVET France
- Raphaël GLUCKSMANN France
- Romana JERKOVIĆ Croatia
- Thijs REUTEN Netherlands
- Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN France
- Tonino PICULA Croatia
Renew line For · 4 voted against, 3 abstained of 69 who voted
Voted against (4)
- Abir AL-SAHLANI Sweden
- Asger CHRISTENSEN Denmark
- Emma WIESNER Sweden
- Morten LØKKEGAARD Denmark
Abstained (3)
- Elsi KATAINEN Finland
- Katri KULMUNI Finland
- Stine BOSSE Denmark
EPP line For · 5 voted against, 8 abstained of 160 who voted
Voted against (5)
- Aura SALLA Finland
- Christian DOLESCHAL Germany
- Henrik DAHL Denmark
- Niels Flemming HANSEN Denmark
- Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ Czechia
Abstained (8)
- Alexander BERNHUBER Austria
- Andreas SCHWAB Germany
- Jens GIESEKE Germany
- Jessika VAN LEEUWEN Netherlands
- Michael GAHLER Germany
- Radan KANEV Bulgaria
- Riho TERRAS Estonia
- Sander SMIT Netherlands
ESN line Against · 2 abstained of 24 who voted
Abstained (2)
- Petar VOLGIN Bulgaria
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.33 |
| Belgium | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0.33 |
| Bulgaria | 10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.57 |
| Cyprus | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Czechia | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.33 |
| Germany | 44 | 28 | 11 | 12 | 0.30 |
| Denmark | 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Estonia | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Spain | 35 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 0.69 |
| Finland | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.14 |
| France | 22 | 30 | 13 | 16 | 0.19 |
| Greece | 9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.21 |
| Croatia | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0.25 |
| Hungary | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 0.55 |
| Ireland | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0.65 |
| Italy | 52 | 18 | 0 | 6 | 0.61 |
| Lithuania | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.73 |
| Luxembourg | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Latvia | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Malta | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Netherlands | 11 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 0.07 |
| Poland | 22 | 7 | 16 | 8 | 0.23 |
| Portugal | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.68 |
| Romania | 26 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0.94 |
| Sweden | 10 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0.29 |
| Slovenia | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Slovakia | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.65 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine VERHEYEN Germany | EPP | Speeches6 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Lukas SIEPER changed group Germany | Renew | Speeches4 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Martin SCHIRDEWAN Germany | The Left | Speeches3 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | Against |
| Katarina BARLEY Germany | S&D | Speeches3 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
| Andreas SCHIEDER Austria | S&D | Speeches3 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Maria OHISALO Finland | Greens | Speeches3 | 10 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | Against |
Show the other 66 speakers
All votes on this decision, 260
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 24, adding text before paragraph 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 24 | Roll call | 140 for, 478 against, 8 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, ECR |
| 2 | Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 63 | Roll call | 128 for, 482 against, 14 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 3 | Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 3/1 Part voted on: ‘Strongly welcomes the Commission’s commitment to deliver and implement an ambitious European Affordable Housing Plan;’ | Roll call | 468 for, 123 against, 34 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
Show the other 259 votesShow the other 257 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 63 | Roll call | 128 for, 482 against, 14 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 3 | Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 3/1 Part voted on: ‘Strongly welcomes the Commission’s commitment to deliver and implement an ambitious European Affordable Housing Plan;’ | Roll call | 468 for, 123 against, 34 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Strongly welcomes the Commission’s commitment to deliver and implement an ambitious European Affordable Housing Plan;’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 5 | Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “recalls that the Affordable Housing Plan must respect the principle of subsidiarity, taking into account the specific needs of each Member State;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 6 | Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 64 | Roll call | 133 for, 476 against, 21 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 7 | Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 65 | Roll call | 122 for, 484 against, 20 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 8 | Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 66 | Roll call | 127 for, 476 against, 26 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 9 | Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 67 | Roll call | 128 for, 471 against, 27 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 10 | Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to duly take into account Parliament’s position on the housing crisis; calls on the Commission to convene the first EU housing summit focused on concrete solutions; stresses that the European Affordable Housing Plan should prioritise actions to increase genuine affordability, and support Member States in delivering decent, sustainable and affordable homes for millions of Europeans; points out that housing is a Member State competence, but acknowledges that sectoral EU legislation may have an impact on the overall viability and costliness of building and on the renovation and repurposing of houses;’ ‘points out that housing is a Member State competence’ and ‘insists that there are EU initiatives that can bring about real added value to addressing the housing crisis, not least by tapping into the full potential of the single market in the construction sector, enabling greater investment via the use of EU funds, raising the standards of the quality of dwellings, enhancing evidence through data collection and sharing, supporting efforts and investment in upskilling and reskilling, facilitating the mobility of construction workers, and boosting the simplification of permitting; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be aligned with the European Pillar of Social Rights, and for it to help tackle social inequalities, eradicate poverty in the EU, and promote social, economic and territorial cohesion and upward convergence;’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 11 | Paragraph 4 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 4/2 Part voted on: “points out that housing is a Member State competence” | Roll call | 516 for, 79 against, 33 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 12 | Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “points out that housing is a Member State competence” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 13 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 14 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 15 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 15 | Roll call | 92 for, 491 against, 43 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 16 | Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 96 | Roll call | 177 for, 431 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 17 | Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 97 | Roll call | 173 for, 423 against, 22 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 18 | Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 98 | Roll call | 155 for, 431 against, 34 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 19 | Amendment 99, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 99 | Roll call | 193 for, 419 against, 7 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 20 | Separate vote on paragraph 6 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 21 | Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 10 – Am 25 | Roll call | 97 for, 494 against, 29 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 22 | Paragraph 11 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘large-scale’ and ‘abusive’ and ‘by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,’, ‘calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply; considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;’ ‘recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;’” | Roll call | 565 for, 39 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 23 | Paragraph 11 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/2 Part voted on: “large-scale” | Roll call | 329 for, 260 against, 32 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 24 | Paragraph 11 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/3 Part voted on: “abusive” | Roll call | 451 for, 147 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 25 | Paragraph 11 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/4 Part voted on: “by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,” | Roll call | 477 for, 120 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 26 | Paragraph 11 — part 5 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/5 Part voted on: “calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply;” | Roll call | 545 for, 29 against, 52 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 27 | Paragraph 11 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/6 Part voted on: “considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;” | Roll call | 516 for, 40 against, 66 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 28 | Paragraph 11 — part 7 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/7 Part voted on: “recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;” | Roll call | 439 for, 160 against, 23 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 29 | Separate vote on paragraph 12 | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, EPP, Greens |
| 30 | Separate vote on paragraph 12 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 12 | Roll call | 437 for, 156 against, 34 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: The Left, EPP, Greens |
| 31 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 32 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 33 | Separate vote on paragraph 13 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 34 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/2 Part voted on: “urges competent public authorities to mobilise publicly owned land, review land zoning regulations and reclassify infrastructure-ready land for immediate development, to fast-track the delivery of affordable housing and cooperative, social and non-profit models; highlights that any land-use strategy must balance housing needs with high-quality construction standards;” | Roll call | 443 for, 87 against, 96 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 35 | Paragraph 13 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/3 Part voted on: “including the development of public infrastructure,” | Roll call | 540 for, 69 against, 9 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 36 | Paragraph 13 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/4 Part voted on: “to ensure social cohesion and prevent socio-economic segregation and market-distorting practices;” | Roll call | 462 for, 101 against, 63 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 37 | Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 68 | Roll call | 127 for, 486 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR, Greens |
| 38 | Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 13 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 83 | Roll call | 127 for, 482 against, 13 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 39 | Amendment 69 to paragraph 14 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 14 – Am 69 | Roll call | 119 for, 483 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: EPP, Greens |
| 40 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 15 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 15 – Am 26 | Roll call | 123 for, 486 against, 13 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 41 | Amendment 27 to paragraph 16 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16 – Am 27 | Roll call | 131 for, 483 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 42 | Paragraph 16 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’, ‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ ‘calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing’ and ‘priority’ and ‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’” | Roll call | 577 for, 44 against, 7 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 43 | Paragraph 16 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/2 Part voted on: “including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,” | Roll call | 466 for, 133 against, 25 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 44 | Paragraph 16 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/3 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ without the words: ‘housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver’ | Roll call | 526 for, 79 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 45 | Paragraph 16 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/4 Part voted on: “housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver” | Roll call | 424 for, 157 against, 42 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 46 | Paragraph 16 — part 5 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/5 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing” | Roll call | 553 for, 34 against, 27 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 47 | Paragraph 16 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/6 Part voted on: “priority” | Roll call | 431 for, 132 against, 66 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 48 | Paragraph 16 — part 7 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/7 Part voted on: “allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures” | Roll call | 486 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, ECR |
| 49 | Separate vote on paragraph 17 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 50 | Paragraph 17 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 17/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 440 for, 156 against, 25 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 51 | Separate vote on paragraph 19 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 52 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 19/2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully integrate the Commission’s Renovation Wave strategy into housing policies, including support schemes for private housing upgrades, ensuring that building renovation is not only focused on energy efficiency and decarbonisation, but also on social fairness and the expansion of affordable housing supply, improving quality of life, preventing disproportionate rent hikes during renovations and reducing long-term housing costs; stresses the importance of setting specific renovation earmarks within the forthcoming European Affordable Housing Plan and of contributing to improving the average energy performance levels of the residential housing sector and prioritising the worst performing buildings; calls on Member States facing high concentrations of low-efficiency, standardised multistorey buildings to develop mechanisms that enable the necessary renovation rates to meet EU targets; supports incentives for the renovation of dwellings in densely populated areas and advocates solutions that positively incentivise owners to put houses back on the market to make them available for long-term renting, particularly in pressured urban areas; underlines that when designing housing policies, competent authorities should be able to carry out a single and thorough environmental assessment, avoiding unnecessary duplications, and complete the necessary administrative and procedural steps for a given geographic area prior to the development of residential projects;’ | Roll call | 518 for, 87 against, 23 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 53 | Paragraph 20 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses the importance of the social climate plans in supporting renovation to help tackle high energy prices;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 54 | Paragraph 20 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 55 | Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/1 Part voted on: “Demands the immediate repeal of Directive (EU) 2023/959, which introduces the emissions trading system (ETS 2) covering the building sector,” | Roll call | 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN |
| 56 | Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/2 Part voted on: “considering that it functions as an anti-social and economically harmful de facto tax on heating; points out that including homes in emissions trading will lead to a rapid increase in housing costs, hitting low-income families hardest; opposes the ideological inflation of energy prices, which undermines the competitiveness of the European construction sector and pushes millions of citizens toward energy poverty;” | Roll call | 193 for, 404 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN |
| 57 | Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 70 | Roll call | 118 for, 492 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 58 | Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 71 | Roll call | 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR, Greens |
| 59 | Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 72 | Roll call | 111 for, 494 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR, Greens |
| 60 | Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 73 | Roll call | 119 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 61 | Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 74 | Roll call | 103 for, 488 against, 28 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: EPP, Greens |
| 62 | Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/1 Part voted on: “Calls for the complete repeal of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1a (EPBD),” | Roll call | 189 for, 405 against, 28 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN |
| 63 | Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/2 Part voted on: “which, through mandatory renovations, imposes unrealistic financial burdens on homeowners ranging from EUR 15 000 to EUR 100 000 per building; stresses that mandating the zero-emission building standard drastically increases construction costs and discourages new investment, which is extremely irresponsible in the face of the housing crisis; maintains that owners and the free market must determine the pace of property modernisation;” | Roll call | 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN |
| 64 | Paragraph 21 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’ do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’, ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’ and ‘while respecting national priorities and available resources’” | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 65 | Paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’ do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’, ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’ and ‘while respecting national priorities and available resources’” | Roll call | 499 for, 105 against, 19 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 66 | Paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/2 Part voted on: “acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;” | Roll call | 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 67 | Paragraph 21 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 68 | Paragraph 21 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/4 Part voted on: “warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;” | Roll call | 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 69 | Paragraph 21 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should” | Counted | 494 for, 114 against, 12 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, The Left |
| 70 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 22 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22 – Am 28 | Roll call | 121 for, 476 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 71 | Paragraph 22 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and incentive-based’ and ‘the Commission and’ and ‘new construction; calls, following a comprehensive impact assessment, for a reform of the VAT Directive that could allow for the application of a super-reduced value added tax rate to the supply and construction of housing, as part of a social policy, as defined by the Member States, to renovation and alteration, including demolition and reconstruction, and repairing of housing and private dwellings, and to the letting of immovable property for residential use;’ ‘respect fiscal neutrality’ and ‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 72 | Paragraph 22 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/2 Part voted on: “and incentive-based” | Roll call | 489 for, 122 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 73 | Paragraph 22 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “and incentive-based” | Counted | 264 for, 338 against, 12 abstained Rejected | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 74 | Paragraph 22 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/4 Part voted on: “new construction; calls, following a comprehensive impact assessment, for a reform of the VAT Directive that could allow for the application of a super-reduced value added tax rate to the supply and construction of housing, as part of a social policy, as defined by the Member States, to renovation and alteration, including demolition and reconstruction, and repairing of housing and private dwellings, and to the letting of immovable property for residential use;” | Roll call | 461 for, 127 against, 33 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 75 | Paragraph 22 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “the Commission and” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 76 | Paragraph 22 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/6 Part voted on: ‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’ | Roll call | 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Greens, ECR, Patriots |
| 77 | Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 22 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 22 – Am 29 | Roll call | 77 for, 523 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, ECR |
| 78 | Amendment 30 to paragraph 23 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23 – Am 30 | Roll call | 120 for, 472 against, 26 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 79 | Paragraph 23 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘increasing mobility and’ and ‘any tax and’ and ‘incentives to’ and ‘housing’ and ‘market’ and ‘and market-distorting practices’” | Roll call | 558 for, 40 against, 22 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 80 | Separate vote on paragraph 23 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 81 | Paragraph 23 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23/3 Part voted on: “and market-distorting practices” | Roll call | 444 for, 164 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 82 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 23 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 83 | Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 24 – Am 31 | Roll call | 98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 84 | Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 25 – Am 75 | Roll call | 139 for, 448 against, 36 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 85 | Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 26 – Am 76 | Roll call | 114 for, 482 against, 21 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 86 | Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 27 – Am 77 | Roll call | 135 for, 479 against, 5 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: EPP, Greens |
| 87 | Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 27 – Am 78 | Roll call | 106 for, 486 against, 27 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 88 | Amendment 32 to paragraph 28 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28 – Am 32 | Roll call | 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, EPP |
| 89 | Separate vote on paragraph 28 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28 | Roll call | 449 for, 129 against, 40 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP, Greens |
| 90 | Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 28 – Am 79 | Roll call | 137 for, 478 against, 12 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 91 | Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 28 – Am 80 | Roll call | 153 for, 432 against, 27 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 92 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 93 | Amendment 33 to paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29 – Am 33 | Roll call | 127 for, 487 against, 13 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 94 | Paragraph 29 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/1 Part voted on: ‘Encourages property owners to offer long-term and stable rental contracts, in order to enhance security of tenure and provide greater predictability for tenants; encourages the Member States to increase transparency in the private rental sector, based on the advertised prices, with the aim of improving housing conditions for tenants, and to strengthen national legislation in this regard; calls on the Member States to strengthen the protection of tenants’ rights, including by encouraging online rental platforms to provide information on average rent levels in the area, in order to ensure fair conditions and prevent disproportionate rent increases; calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their commitment to ensuring equality and non-discrimination in the housing sector; calls for coordinated responses from social services to resolve tenant-owner conflicts and prevent further vulnerability of the parties involved, including small owners and vulnerable tenants in these circumstances; encourages the Member States to offer legal dispute settlement mechanisms for resolving housing-related disputes, for example, in cases of prolonged or abusive non-compliance with rental contracts that deprive owners of the legitimate use of their homes, as well as landlords who fail to comply with tenants obligations; calls on public authorities to protect families, in particular those with children, for example, by facilitating access to temporary shelter to address short-term vulnerability, with the protection of vulnerable families resting with competent authorities; underlines that local authorities need to identify and address cases of non-compliance with property, management and safety requirements, contributing to higher standards in the private rental market; condemns abusive housing practices that subject tenants in vulnerable situations to inadequate, unsafe or unsanitary conditions;’ without the words ‘long-term and’ | Roll call | 558 for, 47 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP, S&D; split: Patriots |
| 95 | Paragraph 29 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/2 Part voted on: “long-term and” | Roll call | 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP, S&D; split: Patriots |
| 96 | Paragraph 29 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/3 Part voted on: ‘supports the role of tenants’ unions and housing civil society actors as stakeholders in housing policy;’ | Roll call | 498 for, 97 against, 22 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots, EPP, S&D; split: Patriots |
| 97 | Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 34 | Roll call | 108 for, 484 against, 32 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 98 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 35 | Roll call | 102 for, 497 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, ECR |
| 99 | Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 36 | Roll call | 120 for, 459 against, 40 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 100 | Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 37 | Roll call | 105 for, 501 against, 20 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 101 | Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 38 | Roll call | 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, ECR |
| 102 | Paragraph 30 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/1 Part voted on: “Is concerned about the labour gap and the lack of competitiveness in the construction and renovation sectors, and the shortage of skilled workers; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be connected to the EU Quality Jobs Roadmap; underlines that the housing crisis cannot be solved without a fully trained and mobile construction workforce; stresses the importance of improving the working conditions of construction workers in order to address labour shortages and attract a skilled workforce;” | Roll call | 565 for, 46 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 103 | Paragraph 30 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/2 Part voted on: ‘underlines, therefore, the need to guarantee fair wages, stable employment, safe working conditions, improved contracts, and health and safety standards; stresses that workers’ rights should be respected and enforced, and encourages effective monitoring, including the use of digital tools and company registers to detect fraud; calls for national measures to prevent accidents at construction sites; calls for strengthening the implementation of the EU occupational safety and health acquis; calls for the Member States to improve collective bargaining for workers in the construction and renovation sectors;’ | Roll call | 452 for, 86 against, 81 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots, S&D; split: Patriots |
| 104 | Separate vote on paragraph 31 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 105 | Paragraph 31 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 31/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 440 for, 157 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 106 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 31 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 107 | Separate vote on paragraph 32 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 32 | Roll call | 483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 108 | Paragraph 33 — part 1 of 4 Part voted on: ‘Encourages the Commission and the Member States to ensure that legal labour migrants and seasonal workers whose accommodation is provided through their employer have access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing; stresses that no worker should be forced to live in overcrowded or poor conditions;’ without the words: ‘legal’ and ‘whose accommodation is provided through their employer’ | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 109 | Paragraph 33 — part 2 of 4 Part voted on: “legal” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 110 | Paragraph 33 — part 3 of 4 Part voted on: “whose accommodation is provided through their employer” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 111 | Paragraph 33 — part 4 of 4 Part voted on: ‘calls for strengthened monitoring in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers; stresses the need to assess whether such spatial segregation undermines social cohesion and the integration of communities; calls on the Member States to collect data at regional and local level on the location and conditions of employer-provided accommodation; calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ without the words: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;’ and ‘calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 112 | Paragraph 33 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/4 Part voted on: ‘calls for strengthened monitoring in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers; stresses the need to assess whether such spatial segregation undermines social cohesion and the integration of communities; calls on the Member States to collect data at regional and local level on the location and conditions of employer-provided accommodation; calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ without the words: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;’ and ‘calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ | Roll call | 451 for, 165 against, 10 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 113 | Paragraph 33 — part 5 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/5 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;” | Roll call | 443 for, 153 against, 23 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 114 | Paragraph 33 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/6 Part voted on: “calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;” | Roll call | 428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, The Left, Patriots |
| 115 | Separate vote on paragraph 34 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 116 | Paragraph 34 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 34/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 117 | Amendment 39 to paragraph 35 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 35 – Am 39 | Roll call | 123 for, 476 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 118 | Paragraph 35 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on public authorities to effectively regulate subcontracting, ensuring that public funds support companies that provide high-quality social working conditions and respect industry standards; calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 119 | Paragraph 35 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “calls on public authorities to effectively regulate subcontracting, ensuring that public funds support companies that provide high-quality social working conditions and respect industry standards; calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 120 | Paragraph 35 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 121 | Separate vote on subheading 11 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 122 | Separate vote on paragraph 36 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 123 | Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 36 – Am 40 | Roll call | 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 124 | Paragraph 37 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘can’ and ‘underlines the importance of favouring projects aimed at enhancing inclusive neighbourhoods with opportunities for all;’ ‘acknowledges the maintenance costs of public housing stock, and therefore encourages efficient and effective processes aimed at reducing the budgetary burden for public administrations and citizens;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 125 | Paragraph 37 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 37/2 Part voted on: “can” | Roll call | 469 for, 130 against, 22 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: The Left; split: The Left, Patriots |
| 126 | Paragraph 37 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “can” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 127 | Paragraph 37 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “underlines the importance of favouring projects aimed at enhancing inclusive neighbourhoods with opportunities for all;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 128 | Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 41 | Roll call | 119 for, 484 against, 26 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 129 | Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 37 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 42 | Roll call | 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 130 | Amendment 81 to paragraph 39 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 81 | Roll call | 128 for, 477 against, 20 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 131 | Amendment 43 to paragraph 39 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 43 | Roll call | 91 for, 483 against, 48 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 132 | Separate vote on paragraph 39 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ECR |
| 133 | Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 39 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 39 – Am 44 | Roll call | 139 for, 455 against, 27 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 134 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 135 | Amendment 82 to paragraph 40 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 40 – Am 82 | Roll call | 142 for, 461 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 136 | Paragraph 40 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘may’ and ‘the right to private property ownership, legal certainty for owners, and’, ‘considers that certain measures could help urban centres regain their residential functions, such as adequate and proportionate licensing systems, increased transparency regarding large-scale foreign property acquisitions in order to monitor housing availability, authorisations from neighbours’ associations or the main owner, or safety, quality and consumer protection standards, ensuring that those policies are proportionate and tailored to the specific circumstances;’ underlines that measures are needed to safeguard housing for residents and preserve the diversity and vitality of urban communities;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 137 | Paragraph 40 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “may” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 138 | Paragraph 40 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “the right to private property ownership, legal certainty for owners, and” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left, Patriots |
| 139 | Paragraph 40 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 40/4 Part voted on: ‘considers that certain measures could help urban centres regain their residential functions, such as adequate and proportionate licensing systems, increased transparency regarding large-scale foreign property acquisitions in order to monitor housing availability, authorisations from neighbours’ associations or the main owner, or safety, quality and consumer protection standards, ensuring that those policies are proportionate and tailored to the specific circumstances; underlines that measures are needed to safeguard housing for residents and preserve the diversity and vitality of urban communities;’ | Roll call | 542 for, 43 against, 36 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: The Left, Patriots |
| 140 | Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41 – Am 46 | Roll call | 99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 141 | Paragraph 41 — part 1 of 6 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the mobilisation of private investment, as it is important to complement’ and ‘and as the public sector alone cannot address the current lack of liquidity in the market’ and ‘the private sector’ and ‘and listed real estate companies’ and ‘notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;’ ‘calls for the completion of the Savings and Investments Union as a way to enhance the availability of private capital across borders;’ and ‘calls on the Member States to explore dedicated housing investment vehicles to channel private savings into affordable housing projects;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 142 | Paragraph 41 — part 2 of 6 Part voted on: “the mobilisation of private investment, as it is important to complement” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 143 | Paragraph 41 — part 3 of 6 Part voted on: “and as the public sector alone cannot address the current lack of liquidity in the market” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 144 | Paragraph 41 — part 4 of 6 Part voted on: “the private sector” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 145 | Paragraph 41 — part 5 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/5 Part voted on: “and listed real estate companies” | Roll call | 453 for, 147 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 146 | Paragraph 41 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/6 Part voted on: “notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;” | Roll call | 480 for, 132 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 147 | Paragraph 41 — part 5 of 6 Part voted on: “and listed real estate companies” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 148 | Paragraph 41 — part 6 of 6 Part voted on: “notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 149 | Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 41 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 41 – Am 47 | Roll call | 114 for, 494 against, 20 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left, ECR |
| 150 | Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 41 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 41 – Am 48 | Roll call | 115 for, 485 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 151 | Separate vote on paragraph 42 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 152 | Paragraph 42 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/2 Part voted on: “notes that the Capital Requirements Directive allows Member States to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures and that some opted to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures secured by residential property, which increase the financing costs for commercial real estate; calls on the European Banking Authority to make full use of the flexibilities under its guidelines to support mortgages on residential property, while ensuring financial stability; calls on the Member States to carefully assess the appropriateness of the level of systemic risk buffers for exposures collateralised by residential property; supports the possibility provided in the Capital Requirements Regulation to allow for preferential prudential treatment of exposures relating to land acquisition, development and construction, thereby facilitating access to financing for housing development;” | Roll call | 447 for, 128 against, 48 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 153 | Paragraph 42 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/3 Part voted on: ‘welcomes, in this regard, the review of the EU securitisation framework presented by the Commission on 17 June 2025 with the aim of freeing up banks’ balance sheets and enhancing banks’ lending capacity; calls on the Commission to assess the impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation on small construction companies, in order to ensure that loans for residential projects are dealt with in a proportional manner, reflecting the fact that lower systemic risk projects are often pre-sold, insured or guaranteed by public authorities;’ | Roll call | 454 for, 141 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 154 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 42 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 42 – Am 16 | Roll call | 71 for, 507 against, 46 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 155 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 42 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 42 – Am 17 | Roll call | 126 for, 474 against, 22 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 156 | Amendment 84 to paragraph 43 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 43 – Am 84 | Roll call | 120 for, 480 against, 24 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 157 | Amendment 49 to paragraph 43 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 43 – Am 49 | Roll call | 137 for, 458 against, 22 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 158 | Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘underlines the role of the Stability and Growth Pact in ensuring financial stability in the EU, which is a prerequisite for the proliferation of housing;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 159 | Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 160 | Separate vote on paragraph 44 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 161 | Paragraph 45 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘recommends a stronger InvestEU programme for the 2028-2034 period to increase the volume of guarantees backed by the EU budget for decent, sustainable and affordable housing projects;’ and ‘further explore the added value of creating a European housing agency,’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew, ECR, Patriots |
| 162 | Paragraph 45 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “recommends a stronger InvestEU programme for the 2028-2034 period to increase the volume of guarantees backed by the EU budget for decent, sustainable and affordable housing projects;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew, ECR, Patriots |
| 163 | Paragraph 45 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 45/3 Part voted on: “further explore the added value of creating a European housing agency,” | Roll call | 359 for, 230 against, 26 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Renew, ECR, Patriots |
| 164 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 45 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 45 – Am 18 | Roll call | 150 for, 446 against, 21 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 165 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 45 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 166 | Paragraph 46 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘urges the Member States to adopt multi-annual social housing delivery targets, including in relation to infrastructure and services;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 167 | Paragraph 46 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR |
| 168 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 46 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 46 – Am 19 | Roll call | 147 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 169 | Paragraph 47 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and international financial institutions’ and ‘and securitisation’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 170 | Paragraph 47 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and international financial institutions” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens |
| 171 | Paragraph 47 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 47/3 Part voted on: “and securitisation” | Roll call | 452 for, 151 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens |
| 172 | Amendment 51 to paragraph 48 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48 – Am 51 | Roll call | 105 for, 494 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 173 | Paragraph 48 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/1 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to analyse housing price dynamics, including available evidence of potentially abusive speculation, and, on the basis of this analysis, to call on the Member States for possible appropriate measures;’ without the words: ‘potentially abusive’ | Roll call | 506 for, 106 against, 9 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 174 | Paragraph 48 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/2 Part voted on: “potentially abusive” | Roll call | 458 for, 140 against, 18 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 175 | Paragraph 48 — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/3 Part voted on: “stresses the importance of safeguarding financial stability and ensuring that financial instruments contribute to ensuring decent, sustainable and affordable housing for all; calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance transparency in real estate transactions, including through improved data collection” | Roll call | 514 for, 84 against, 17 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 176 | Paragraph 48 — part 4 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/4 Part voted on: ‘and possible EU-level tools; calls on the Commission and the Member States to exchange data and best practice on combating abusive financialisation practices and speculative purchases, reducing the likelihood of destabilising local housing markets;’ without the word: ‘abusive’ | Roll call | 485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 177 | Paragraph 48 — part 5 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/5 Part voted on: “abusive” | Roll call | 469 for, 129 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 178 | Paragraph 48 — part 6 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/6 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to adopt measures to incentivise bringing vacant and derelict homes back into use, as this is essential to increasing supply, safeguarding affordability, and revitalising communities; stresses that public investment in housing should serve the public interest and deliver long-term value; welcomes public ownership models where housing remains publicly managed,” | Roll call | 549 for, 35 against, 29 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 179 | Paragraph 48 — part 7 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/7 Part voted on: ‘which could be useful in certain contexts to prevent abusive financialisation practices,’ without the words: ‘could be useful in certain contexts to’ and ‘abusive’ | Roll call | 532 for, 60 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 180 | Paragraph 48 — part 8 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/8 Part voted on: “could be useful in certain contexts to” | Roll call | 475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 181 | Paragraph 48 — part 9 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/9 Part voted on: “abusive” | Roll call | 450 for, 138 against, 25 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 182 | Paragraph 48 — part 10 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/10 Part voted on: ‘underlining that housing projects that pass into private hands are also legitimate;’ ‘stresses that Member States should be free to choose how to manage these projects in line with their national policies;’ | Roll call | 474 for, 123 against, 16 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens, Patriots |
| 183 | Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 48 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 20 | Roll call | 127 for, 493 against, 4 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 184 | Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 48 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 85 | Roll call | 154 for, 438 against, 25 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 185 | Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 48 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 86 | Roll call | 147 for, 445 against, 23 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 186 | Separate vote on paragraph 49 | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: The Left |
| 187 | Separate vote on paragraph 49 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left |
| 188 | Separate vote on paragraph 49 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: The Left |
| 189 | Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 49 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 49 – Am 105 | Roll call | 405 for, 154 against, 62 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP |
| 190 | Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates, in this context, its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee;’” | Roll call | 529 for, 72 against, 19 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP, S&D; split: ECR |
| 191 | Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: EPP, S&D; split: ECR |
| 192 | Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 52 – Am 87 | Roll call | 106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 193 | Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 52 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 52 – Am 53 | Roll call | 127 for, 472 against, 17 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 194 | Amendment 61 to paragraph 53 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53 – Am 61 | Roll call | 281 for, 306 against, 31 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: EPP |
| 195 | Paragraph 53 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;’ and ‘with a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Greens, ECR |
| 196 | Paragraph 53 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53/2 Part voted on: “recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;” | Roll call | 480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens, ECR |
| 197 | Paragraph 53 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;” | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens, ECR |
| 198 | Amendment 54 to paragraph 55 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55 – Am 54 | Roll call | 150 for, 438 against, 33 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 199 | Amendment 60 to paragraph 55 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55 – Am 60 | Roll call | 99 for, 505 against, 17 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 200 | Separate vote on paragraph 55 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 201 | Paragraph 55 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to integrate gender-based violence considerations into EU housing policy;” | Roll call | 432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 202 | Amendment 55 to paragraph 57 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57 – Am 55 | Roll call | 125 for, 485 against, 8 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 203 | Paragraph 57 — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that action on homelessness is primarily a competence of the Member States, while the EU should support and coordinate efforts;’ and ‘calls on the Member States to adopt national targets to prevent the eviction of children in cases where there is a clear risk of homelessness’” | Roll call | 550 for, 49 against, 20 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 204 | Paragraph 57 — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 524 for, 75 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots |
| 205 | Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 57 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 57 – Am 56 | Roll call | 111 for, 491 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 206 | Separate vote on paragraph 58 | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 207 | Separate vote on paragraph 58 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 208 | Separate vote on paragraph 58 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 209 | Separate vote on citation 47 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Citation 47 | Roll call | 356 for, 188 against, 57 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 210 | Vote on text inserted after recital C | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 211 | Recital G — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas simplifying and streamlining the complex set of rules in order to speed up housing construction, repurposing and renovation across Europe is crucial for the provision of decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ and ‘where needed’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew, The Left |
| 212 | Recital G — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “whereas simplifying and streamlining the complex set of rules in order to speed up housing construction, repurposing and renovation across Europe is crucial for the provision of decent, sustainable and affordable housing;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew, The Left |
| 213 | Recital G — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “where needed” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Renew, The Left |
| 214 | Amendment 88, adding text after recital D A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital D – Am 88 | Roll call | 193 for, 412 against, 18 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 215 | Amendment 7, adding text after recital F A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital F – Am 7 | Roll call | 106 for, 511 against, 6 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 216 | Vote on text inserted after recital F | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 217 | Amendment 90, adding text after recital H A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital H – Am 90 | Roll call | 178 for, 430 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 218 | Vote on text inserted after recital H | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 219 | Recital J — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/1 Part voted on: ‘whereas 10.6 % of EU citizens reported being unable to adequately heat their homes in 2023; whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety; whereas the Energy Efficiency Directive, which was revised in 2023, raises the EU energy efficiency target, requiring a further 11.7 % reduction in energy consumption by 2030;’ without the words: ‘whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;’ | Roll call | 573 for, 43 against, 10 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 220 | Recital J — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/2 Part voted on: “whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;” | Roll call | 422 for, 172 against, 25 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 221 | Separate vote on recital J | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 222 | Recital K — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘whereas energy poverty is an issue affecting all Member States and has a disproportionate impact on vulnerable families, including children and elderly, particularly in large, ageing housing blocks with low energy efficiency that result in high heating costs; whereas 14.5 million children in the EU lived in homes with leaks, damp or mould in 2023 and 154 000 Europeans die prematurely every year due to poor indoor air quality; whereas 75 % of the EU’s building stock has a poor energy performance rating; whereas energy-efficient buildings powered by renewable energy could reduce energy bills, improve health and well-being, and minimise long-term operational costs; whereas buildings account for 40 % of final energy consumption in the EU; whereas all EU countries should have established a draft national building renovation plan by 31 December 2025; whereas the plans will provide essential information for housing policies, including an overview of the national building stock, investment needs and financing sources; whereas the speed and level of renovations is still unsatisfactory; whereas energy-efficient renovation is unattractive for older people, who have the highest rate of ownership of old homes;’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 223 | Recital K — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas the Renovation Wave initiative should promote energy-efficient retrofits aiming for energy performance levels at reasonable cost-efficiency;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 224 | Separate vote on recital N | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 225 | Recital N — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital N/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 226 | Amendment 62 to recital O A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O – Am 62 | Roll call | 132 for, 472 against, 14 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 227 | Recital O — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas private property is threatened by illegal occupation, known as squatting, and systematic non-payment of rent phenomena, which harms communities and particularly small property owners, forcing them to exit the market and to rightfully recover their property, thereby reducing the available supply and contributing to rising prices; whereas illegally staying in a property undermines the EU Charter and constitutes a violation of the rule of law;’” | Roll call | 539 for, 77 against, 5 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: The Left |
| 228 | Recital O — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 478 for, 116 against, 22 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: The Left, Patriots; split: The Left |
| 229 | Vote on text inserted after recital O | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 230 | Amendment 92, adding text after recital O A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital O – Am 92 | Roll call | 170 for, 441 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 231 | Recital P — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas forced evictions are defined as the permanent or temporary removal, against their will, of individuals, families or communities from the homes or land they occupy, without the provision of, and access to, appropriate forms of legal or other protection;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 232 | Recital P — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 233 | Recital Q — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and relatively high levels of temporary employment and self-employment associated with long subcontracting chains and the cyclical and project-based nature of employment in the sector’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 234 | Recital Q — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Counted | 365 for, 230 against, 16 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 235 | Separate vote on recital R | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR |
| 236 | Recital R — part 1 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas labour migrants and seasonal workers make a contribution to key sectors across the EU, yet many are housed in overcrowded or poor accommodation;’ and ‘whereas the responsibility of the private sector to end these types of practices must be clearly defined;’” | Roll call | 562 for, 34 against, 21 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR |
| 237 | Recital R — part 2 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/2 Part voted on: “whereas labour migrants and seasonal workers make a contribution to key sectors across the EU, yet many are housed in overcrowded or poor accommodation;” | Roll call | 441 for, 148 against, 20 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR |
| 238 | Recital R — part 3 A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/3 Part voted on: “whereas the responsibility of the private sector to end these types of practices must be clearly defined;” | Roll call | 457 for, 138 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR |
| 239 | Amendment 23, adding text after recital S A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital S – Am 23 | Roll call | 132 for, 472 against, 12 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ECR |
| 240 | Vote on text inserted after recital S | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 241 | Vote on text inserted after recital S | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 242 | Recital T — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the EU’s fragmented and inconsistent legal framework on short-term rentals is undermining enforcement;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 243 | Recital T — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 244 | Recital U — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas access to housing finance is essential to meet housing needs, as well as to support construction, renovation and repurposing, in particular for the approximately 3.8 million SMEs active in the EU construction sector; whereas improving access to credit, without compromising on macroeconomic prudence, should be part of a balanced response to the housing crisis; whereas access to credit for construction has significantly tightened since 2008, with banks reporting declining loan demands across the EU, with mortgage interest rates having increased, thus limiting the development of affordable housing and the sustainable renovation of existing stock; whereas the entire prudential framework should be aimed primarily at ensuring financial stability, focusing on sound banking criteria, and preventing housing bubbles; whereas private developers can play an important role in delivering diverse housing solutions efficiently and sustainably, and at a price that people can afford; whereas crowding-in private investment therefore could be helpful; whereas the renovation, conversion and extension of the existing housing stock is a cost-effective and rapid solution to the housing crisis; whereas, according to the European Central Bank, the last 15 years have seen increased divergence in residential real estate market access, with low- and middle- income households facing greater difficulties in obtaining credit for home purchases; whereas access to loans for purchasing a home can be challenging, specifically for young families and in rural areas, and access to long-term, affordable financing is therefore needed; whereas the regulation of mortgage markets can play a key role in supporting housing affordability;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 245 | Recital U — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas the linkage between real estate trusts and funds, banks and other institutional investors, may pose risks to financial stability; whereas such interlinkages should be subject to transparent reporting;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 246 | Vote on text inserted after recital U | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 247 | Vote on text inserted after recital U | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 248 | Vote on text inserted after recital U | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 249 | Recital V — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: ‘whereas social and affordable housing is financed by national, regional, and local authorities, with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities; whereas investment in social and affordable housing stock has declined dramatically since the 2008 financial crisis; whereas the proportion of public, cooperative and social housing has been steadily declining; whereas just 7 % of the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility fund in 2024 was spent on social housing and other social infrastructure; whereas, in the implementation of the RRF, shortcomings have been identified with regard to transparency and clarity in the definition and monitoring of criteria at national level; whereas national promotional banks and institutions (NPBIs) play an essential role in financing decent, affordable and sustainable housing, leveraging private investment and strengthening the financing framework at national and regional level; whereas NPBIs have promoted more than 380 000 dwellings across the EU and committed close to EUR 50 billion in financing to the housing sector in 2023 alone, thus strongly complementing EU-level initiatives with their long-lasting expertise and experience;’ without the words: ‘with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 250 | Recital V — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 251 | Recital V — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “whereas access to social housing programmes for the most vulnerable groups should be ensured;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 252 | Vote on text inserted after recital V | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 253 | Recital X — part 1 of 4 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the Commission and Member States should adopt multi-year policies aimed at establishing national stocks of affordable and sustainable housing as well as promoting renovations that lower household costs;’ ‘respecting worker’s rights and collective agreements’, ‘whereas the reallocation of unspent Just Transition Fund money could support the construction of housing, as the Commission has encouraged Member States to channel unspent funds to affordable, sustainable and decent housing;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 254 | Recital X — part 2 of 4 Part voted on: “whereas the Commission and Member States should adopt multi-year policies aimed at establishing national stocks of affordable and sustainable housing as well as promoting renovations that lower household costs;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 255 | Recital X — part 3 of 4 Part voted on: ‘respecting worker’s rights and collective agreements’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 256 | Recital X — part 4 of 4 Part voted on: “whereas the reallocation of unspent Just Transition Fund money could support the construction of housing, as the Commission has encouraged Member States to channel unspent funds to affordable, sustainable and decent housing;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ECR, Patriots |
| 257 | Recital Z — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas in many Member States, rents are rising faster than incomes, waiting lists for public housing are growing, and access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing is becoming out of reach for low- and middle-income households; whereas the loss of purchasing power within low- and middle-income households and rising housing costs undermine the possibility of their acquiring or renting affordable housing, with broader demographic and socio-economic consequences, such as increased levels of social exclusion; whereas housing transactions declined in 2023 compared to 2022 in 13 of the 16 Member States for which data is available, marking a second consecutive year of falling sales; whereas addressing not only the supply but also the strategic location of affordable housing, particularly near employment centres, public services and sustainable transport networks, is essential to reduce commuting burdens and enhance quality of life;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 258 | Recital Z — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas an inclusive housing policy should address these inequalities and ensure that everyone, regardless of their background or status, has access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 259 | Vote on text inserted after recital AA | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 260 | Final vote — text as a whole A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Roll call | 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained Adopted |
Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by The Left (8), Greens (10), Renew (2), ECR (15), Patriots (30), ESN (2) · separate votes by ECR.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted a resolution on the housing crisis in the EU, proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing.
The text calls for boosting housing supply, easing investments, and supporting demand, while respecting national competences.
It asks for reduced administrative burdens, streamlined permits, and better data collection to inform policy.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
This resolution addresses the housing crisis in the EU, proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing. It calls for increased supply, reduced regulatory burdens, support for vulnerable groups, and better data collection.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2025/2070(INI) · Own-initiative report
Parliament adopted the text on 10 March 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 3 April 2025 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 9 February 2026 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 25 February 2026 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 10 March 2026 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: HOUS · Author: Borja GIMÉNEZ LARRAZ (EPP)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 9 connections: Running issue: Housing crisis · Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Running issue: Housing crisis
- Issue Housing crisis Running issue · Crisis 7 Jul 2026
- Decision Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities Resolution · motion for a resolution 7 Jul 2026 Adopted
- Decision Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis Resolution · report by Marcos Ros Sempere 10 Sept 2025 Adopted
- Decision Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office Resolution · motion for a resolution 18 Dec 2024 Adopted
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system Resolution · report by Johan Van Overtveldt 7 Jul 2026 Adopted
- Decision Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation New EU law · report by Ralf Seekatz 21 May 2026 Negotiating mandate approved
- Decision Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures New EU law · report by Ralf Seekatz 21 May 2026 Negotiating mandate approved
- Decision Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles New EU law · report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas 9 Sept 2025 Passed
- Decision Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector Resolution · report by Arba Kokalari 25 Nov 2025 Adopted
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Decision, 10 March 2026. votingId 186515, document A-10-2026-0025, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-10-6,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-03-10},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/6}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/6},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 186515, document A-10-2026-0025, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}