Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to paragraph 4

The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act

Vote
Amendment 1 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
161 for · 428 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0156/2026 – § 4 – Am 1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0156
Dossier
2025/2951(RSP)
Vote id
188554
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 161 for, 428 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 123Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 11 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 7Against 150Abst. 3No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 58Against 2Abst. 12No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 6No vote 9 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Spain020
Finland020
France060
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 76 to paragraph 73, after point iii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment190 for, 449 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 551 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 549 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 549 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 130, adding text after paragraph 18 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment193 for, 451 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 555 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment199 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 550 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment173 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 495 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital H Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 447 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 547 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 568 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 560 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 569 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188554
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 188554, reference 2025/2951(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188554 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-188554,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 — The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188554}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/188554},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 188554, reference 2025/2951(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}