Skip to content

Decision

Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024

Effect
Adopted
Result
602 for · 9 against · 8 abstained roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 14:05–14:07
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová
Topics
EU institutions & ParliamentJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
15 votes · 15 roll calls · 14 amendments
Requested by
Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
186375
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (14 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 4Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 159Against 5Abst. 2No vote 20 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 0Abst. 6No vote 8 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 11

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria200001.00
Belgium200021.00
Bulgaria130130.89
Cyprus5001—
Czechia190110.93
Germany7811150.96
Denmark140011.00
Estonia5002—
Spain4040160.86
Finland140011.00
France6400171.00
Greece181020.92
Croatia100021.00
Hungary130081.00
Ireland111020.88
Italy711040.98
Lithuania110001.00
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia9000—
Malta4101—
Netherlands300011.00
Poland460071.00
Portugal210001.00
Romania270061.00
Sweden180031.00
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia70530.38

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 619 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 15

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 10 – Am 10 Roll call173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
2Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 12 – Am 7 Roll call181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – § 26 – Am 11 Roll call170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Show the other 14 votesShow the other 12 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 12 – Am 7 Roll call181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – § 26 – Am 11 Roll call170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 27 – Am 12 Roll call173 for, 433 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
5Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 32 – Am 8 Roll call182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
6Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 32 – Am 9 Roll call181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
7Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 32 – Am 13 Roll call178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
8Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 37 – Am 14 Roll call176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
9Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After citation 13 – Am 1 Roll call183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
10Amendment 2, adding text after recital E A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 2 Roll call180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
11Amendment 3, adding text after recital E A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 3 Roll call182 for, 425 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
12Amendment 4, adding text after recital E A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 4 Roll call186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
13Amendment 5, adding text after recital E A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 5 Roll call182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
14Amendment 6, adding text after recital E A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After recital E – Am 6 Roll call181 for, 426 against, 0 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
15Final vote — text as a whole A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call602 for, 9 against, 8 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0011

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on public access to documents, covering the years 2022 to 2024.

The text reaffirms that access to documents is a fundamental right and calls for a culture of transparency where disclosure is the rule and secrecy the exception.

It also urges timely decisions on requests and early access to legislative and trilogue documents, among other measures.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution assesses the EU institutions' implementation of public access to documents rules for 2022-2024, highlighting systemic delays, over-classification, and lack of transparency in legislative processes.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2137(INI) · Own-initiative report

Public access to documents – report covering the years 2022 - 2024

Parliament adopted the text on 10 March 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 10 July 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 27 January 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 2 February 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 10 March 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Author: Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 4 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024”. Decision, 10 March 2026. votingId 186375, document A-10-2026-0011, reference 2025/2137(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/7 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-10-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186375, document A-10-2026-0011, reference 2025/2137(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}