Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member · Former member

Péter MAGYAR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
18.4 %ⓘ of 490 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
67.8 %ⓘ of 90 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
20 of 81 votesⓘ
Member id
256868
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

18.4 %

90 of 490 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−72.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

67.8 %

61 of 90 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−27.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

24.7 %

20 of 81 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

17.8 %

16 of 90 votes cast

Participation 18.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Péter MAGYAR18.4 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 67.8 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Péter MAGYAR67.8 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 107 to Article 1 66 for, 552 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 101 to Article 1 196 for, 431 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 106 to Article 1 67 for, 540 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 108 to Article 1 195 for, 433 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 105 to Article 1 76 for, 542 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 100 to Article 1 196 for, 433 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 99 to Article 1 203 for, 426 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 98 to Article 1 199 for, 436 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 97 to Article 1 197 for, 433 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 60 to Article 1 — part 4 464 for, 161 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 96 to Article 1 189 for, 443 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 88 to Article 1 195 for, 443 against, 0 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 95 to Article 1 216 for, 412 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 112 for, 479 against, 38 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 206 for, 427 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 94 to Article 1 195 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 36 to Article 1 444 for, 176 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 32 to Article 1 518 for, 97 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 103 to Article 1 90 for, 522 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 31 to Article 1 544 for, 75 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 92 to Article 1 220 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 84 to Article 1 199 for, 431 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 91 to Article 1 214 for, 408 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 90 to Article 1 162 for, 406 against, 57 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 82 541 for, 81 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 81 548 for, 74 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 11 471 for, 161 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final votePassed 437 for, 144 against, 60 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Proposal to reject the text 159 for, 458 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Motion for adjournment of vote 174 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final votePassed 417 for, 154 against, 71 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 118 for, 422 against, 88 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 117 for, 414 against, 97 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 117 for, 414 against, 101 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 158 for, 401 against, 75 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 132 for, 434 against, 73 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 142 for, 427 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 104 for, 456 against, 67 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 62 for, 536 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 56 for, 530 against, 52 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 110 for, 466 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 65 for, 526 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 49, adding text after recital 1 97 for, 493 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 48, adding text after recital 1 58 for, 515 against, 63 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 61 to Article 3 108 for, 480 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to reject the text 160 for, 462 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Motion for adjournment of vote 185 for, 437 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Final voteFailed 228 for, 311 against, 92 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 32, adding text after recital 4 247 for, 301 against, 80 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application Amendment 29 to Article 1 344 for, 236 against, 54 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 49 of 68 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 202411
18 Sept 202420
19 Sept 202460
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 202422
10 Oct 202411
22 Oct 202450
23 Oct 202420
24 Oct 202420
14 Nov 202455
26 Nov 202488
27 Nov 202477
28 Nov 202460
17 Dec 202460
18 Dec 202470
19 Dec 202450
21 Jan 202510
22 Jan 202511
23 Jan 202540
11 Feb 202540
12 Feb 202540
13 Feb 202522
11 Mar 202540
12 Mar 202573
13 Mar 202532
1 Apr 202570
2 Apr 202590
3 Apr 202550
6 May 202541
7 May 20252019
8 May 2025129
22 May 202560
17 Jun 202587
18 Jun 202570
19 Jun 202564
8 Jul 202580
9 Jul 20251412
10 Jul 202570
9 Sept 202560
10 Sept 2025150
11 Sept 202580
7 Oct 202540
8 Oct 2025100
9 Oct 2025100
21 Oct 202580
22 Oct 202560
23 Oct 202550
13 Nov 2025160
25 Nov 2025130
26 Nov 2025100
27 Nov 2025110
16 Dec 2025110
17 Dec 2025110
18 Dec 202560
20 Jan 202664
21 Jan 202681
22 Jan 202680
10 Feb 202680
11 Feb 2026100
12 Feb 202680
24 Feb 202610
10 Mar 202690
11 Mar 2026120
12 Mar 202660
26 Mar 2026130
28 Apr 2026140
29 Apr 2026170
30 Apr 2026110

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary95 % of 788 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary95 % of 777 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary94 % of 783 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary93 % of 682 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary93 % of 768 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg83 % of 362 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 704 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 536 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland82 % of 533 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 557 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia74 % of 802 shared82 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance74 % of 779 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia73 % of 533 shared82 %
Sigrid FRIIS RenewDenmark73 % of 341 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium73 % of 785 shared82 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania73 % of 733 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania73 % of 669 shared82 %
Anna STÜRGKH RenewAustria73 % of 794 shared82 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania73 % of 816 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

15 contributions recorded; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Jul 2025Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 May 2025High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
6 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence (RC-B10-0146/2025, B10-0144/2025, B10-0145/2025, B10-0146/2025, B10-0147/2025, B10-0148/2025, B10-0149/2025, B10-0150/2025, B10-0151/2025) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2025Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 15 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=13&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Péter MAGYAR”. Member record. memberId 256868. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=13&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256868?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-256868,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Péter MAGYAR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=13&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=13&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256868. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}