Skip to content

Member

Gabriella GERZSENYI

EPP · Hungary

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
52.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
79.3 %ⓘ of 324 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
41 of 298 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, REGI (vice-chair)
Member id
256866
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

52.3 %

324 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−38.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

79.3 %

257 of 324 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−16.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.8 %

41 of 298 votes where their group had a clear line

14 opposite (for ↔ against), 27 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

11.7 %

38 of 324 votes cast

Participation 52.3 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Gabriella GERZSENYI52.3 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 79.3 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Gabriella GERZSENYI79.3 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 157 for, 329 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 8 to paragraph 4 83 for, 465 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 49 for, 504 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 104 for, 377 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 511 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 86 for, 415 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Paragraph 6 — part 2 370 for, 180 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 99 for, 427 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 84 for, 464 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 416 for, 190 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital D 187 for, 419 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 195 for, 419 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 423 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 403 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 36 202 for, 424 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 193 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 195 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 189 for, 425 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 197 for, 421 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 198 for, 417 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 193 for, 428 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 212 for, 406 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 407 for, 190 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 14 to recital R 220 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 185 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 201 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 282 for, 334 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 192 for, 418 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 197 for, 416 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 117 336 for, 261 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 188 for, 422 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 218 for, 401 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 3 284 for, 335 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 2 408 for, 192 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 1 498 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 207 for, 410 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 205 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 102 291 for, 240 against, 74 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 101 365 for, 168 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 100 357 for, 203 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 207 for, 406 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 200 for, 411 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 196 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 194 for, 417 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 200 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 181 for, 419 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 206 for, 408 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 25 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary99 % of 2 701 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary99 % of 2 393 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary99 % of 2 356 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary99 % of 2 590 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary97 % of 1 777 shared89 %
Péter MAGYAR Former memberEPPHungary95 % of 777 shared89 %
Marie-Sophie CHRIST EPPGermany89 % of 478 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania86 % of 2 337 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany85 % of 2 259 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania85 % of 2 194 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance76 % of 1 011 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium76 % of 2 595 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia76 % of 2 658 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania75 % of 1 744 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia75 % of 2 425 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia75 % of 1 742 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium75 % of 1 927 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany75 % of 2 669 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium74 % of 2 524 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands74 % of 2 713 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember15 Jun 2026now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute12 Jun 2026now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working groupMember25 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working groupMember6 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember11 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working groupMember5 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and LanguagesIG10-25 Intergroup / working groupMember6 Feb 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 202511 Jun 2026

Show all 17 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM9 Mar 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - CommissionOpinion rapporteurREGI13 Nov 2025
Draft report on general guidelines for the preparation of the 2026 budget (2024/2110(BUI))Opinion rapporteurREGI4 Feb 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairREGI22 Jul 2024

Show all 4 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded, 6 written statements; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 33 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Jun 2026EU funding for institutional care – data and safeguards E-10-2026-002417Written questionwith 10 co-authorsNot yet answered
11 Jun 2026Forced sterilisation of women with disabilities – data and safeguards in institutional settings E-10-2026-002420Written questionwith 7 co-authors22 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026EU-funded deinstitutionalisation reforms in Romania and implementation of person-centred financing E-10-2026-002419Written questionwith 8 co-authors1 Sept 2026
6 May 2026Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857Written questionwith 46 co-authors3 Jul 2026
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026
22 Dec 2025Serious concerns regarding compliance with European values and EU law in Slovakia E-10-2025-005054Written questionwith 12 co-authors21 Apr 2026
20 Dec 2025Implementation of EU anti-poverty strategy based on accurate data E-10-2025-005037Written questionwith 5 co-authors25 Feb 2026
12 Nov 2025Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Jan 2026
22 Sept 2025Non-discrimination between home-based care and institutional care for persons with disabilities in Commission policies and competencies E-10-2025-003653Written questionwith 5 co-authors28 Nov 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057 REGI3
7 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058 REGI1
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI2
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI6
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI10
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI3
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI4

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Gabriella GERZSENYI”. Member record. memberId 256866. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256866?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256866. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256866?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256866,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Gabriella GERZSENYI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256866?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256866?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256866. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256866. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}