Decision · Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets
- Effect
- Objection passed
- Result
- 388 for · 248 against · 24 abstained roll call
- Date
- 8 July 2026, 13:09–13:12
- Kind
- Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
- Margin
- by a clear majority
- Counts are for
- the objection
- Dossier
- 2026/2680(DEA)
- Source
- Motion for a resolution
- Topics
- EnergyClimate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 14 votes · 8 roll calls · 7 amendments
- Requested by
- Greens (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 1 split vote, 1 separate vote)
- Sitting
- Wednesday 8 July 2026
- Final vote
- 195361
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 388 for, 248 against, 24 abstained (roll call).
Objection passed by a clear majority.
The objection passed, so the Commission measure cannot enter into force.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 7 amendments (7 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 5 rejected).
Backed by EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D and Renew.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 0 | Against 40 | Abst. 1 | No vote 4 of 45 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.96 | |
| Greens | For 0 | Against 48 | Abst. 1 | No vote 4 of 53 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.97 | |
| S&D | For 27 | Against 94 | Abst. 2 | No vote 12 of 135 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.65 | |
| Renew | For 14 | Against 40 | Abst. 19 | No vote 5 of 78 | Majority line Against | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.32 | |
| EPP | For 159 | Against 14 | Abst. 0 | No vote 12 of 185 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.88 | |
| ECR | For 78 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 6 of 84 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| Patriots | For 72 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 13 of 85 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| ESN | For 24 | Against 0 | Abst. 1 | No vote 2 of 27 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.94 | |
| No group | For 14 | Against 12 | Abst. 0 | No vote 1 of 27 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group.
Voted against their group, 46
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
The Left line Against · 1 abstained of 41 who voted
Abstained (1)
- João OLIVEIRA Portugal
Greens line Against · 1 abstained of 49 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Thomas WAITZ Austria
S&D line Against · 27 voted for, 2 abstained of 123 who voted
Voted for (27)
- Andi CRISTEA Romania
- Andreas SCHIEDER Austria
- Claire FITA France
- Cristina MAESTRE Spain
- Dan NICA Romania
- Dario NARDELLA Italy
- Dragoş BENEA Romania
- Eero HEINÄLUOMA Finland
- Elena SANCHO MURILLO Spain
- Elisabeth GROSSMANN Austria
- Eric SARGIACOMO France
- Evelyn REGNER Austria
- Gabriela FIREA Romania
- Gheorghe CÂRCIU Romania
- Giorgio GORI Italy
- Günther SIDL Austria
- Hannes HEIDE Austria
- Idoia MENDIA Spain
- Irene TINAGLI Italy
- Maria GRAPINI Romania
- Maria GUZENINA Finland
- Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR Spain
- Raffaele TOPO Italy
- Rosa SERRANO SIERRA Spain
- Ştefan MUŞOIU Romania
- Stefano BONACCINI Italy
- Vasile DÎNCU Romania
Abstained (2)
- Javi LÓPEZ Spain
- Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA Spain
EPP line For · 14 voted against of 173 who voted
Voted against (14)
- Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE Sweden
- Arba KOKALARI Sweden
- Dirk GOTINK Netherlands
- Henrik DAHL Denmark
- Iuliu WINKLER Romania
- Jessica POLFJÄRD Sweden
- Jörgen WARBORN Sweden
- Liesbet SOMMEN Belgium
- Manuela RIPA Germany
- Niels Flemming HANSEN Denmark
- Pascal ARIMONT Belgium
- Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN Finland
- Tomas TOBÉ Sweden
- Wouter BEKE Belgium
ESN line For · 1 abstained of 25 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Ivan DAVID Czechia
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 16 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.76 |
| Belgium | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.32 |
| Bulgaria | 10 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Cyprus | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Czechia | 15 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.82 |
| Germany | 47 | 40 | 5 | 4 | 0.27 |
| Denmark | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0.80 |
| Estonia | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Spain | 31 | 18 | 3 | 8 | 0.39 |
| Finland | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0.36 |
| France | 36 | 24 | 11 | 10 | 0.26 |
| Greece | 11 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 |
| Croatia | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.38 |
| Hungary | 15 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.82 |
| Ireland | 4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0.54 |
| Italy | 44 | 23 | 0 | 9 | 0.49 |
| Lithuania | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0.32 |
| Luxembourg | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Latvia | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Malta | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Netherlands | 12 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0.38 |
| Poland | 48 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.88 |
| Portugal | 9 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0.25 |
| Romania | 24 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0.74 |
| Sweden | 3 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0.78 |
| Slovenia | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Slovakia | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0.36 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor NEGRESCU Romania | S&D | Speeches1 | 8 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
All votes on this decision, 14
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 4 | Roll call | 188 for, 456 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 2 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 5 | Roll call | 188 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 3 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 6 | Roll call | 189 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
Show the other 13 votesShow the other 11 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 5 | Roll call | 188 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 3 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 6 | Roll call | 189 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part B10-0337/2026 – § 3, introductory part – Am 7 | Roll call | 188 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 5 | Separate vote on paragraph 3, point c | Counted | 212 for, 360 against, 92 abstained Rejected | Requested byseparate: Patriots |
| 6 | Recital A — part 1 of 4 Part voted on: ‘whereas Directive (EU) 2018/2001 establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and, in order to ensure that biofuels counting towards that target deliver genuine climate benefits, introduces a framework to address the risk of indirect land-use change (ILUC), under which feedstocks may be classified as high ILUC-risk’ except ‘establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and’ and ‘climate’ | Counted | 456 for, 203 against, 4 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 7 | Recital A — part 2 of 4 Part voted on: “establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and” | Counted | 285 for, 367 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 8 | Recital A — part 3 of 4 Part voted on: “climate” | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 9 | Recital A — part 4 of 4 Part voted on: “and subject to a cap on their contribution to renewable energy targets” | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 10 | Amendment 1 to recital B B10-0337/2026 – Recital B – Am 1 | Roll call | 201 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 11 | Amendment 2, adding text after recital G B10-0337/2026 – After recital G – Am 2 | Roll call | 190 for, 464 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 12 | Separate vote on recital H | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested byseparate: Patriots |
| 13 | Amendment 3, adding text after recital M B10-0337/2026 – After recital M – Am 3 | Roll call | 204 for, 455 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 14 | Final vote — text as a whole B10-0337/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Roll call | 388 for, 248 against, 24 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens, ECR |
Roll calls requested by Greens, ECR, Patriots · split votes by Patriots · separate votes by Patriots.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
The European Parliament voted to block a Commission delegated regulation that would have added soybean to the list of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstocks, phasing out soy-based biodiesel from EU renewable energy targets by 2030.
The objection passed, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and cannot enter into force.
Parliament does not object to the palm oil phase-down or to fixing the certification procedure, and asks the Commission to revise the act accordingly.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament objects to the Commission delegated regulation that adds soybean to the high indirect land-use change-risk list and phases it out from renewable energy targets by 2030.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2026/2680(DEA) · Scrutiny of a delegated act
Commission Delegated Regulation amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 to introduce a trajectory to gradually decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets
Parliament adopted the objection on 8 July 2026 — the Commission measure is blocked.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 29 April 2026 (done)
- Committee work (done)
- Tabled for plenary (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 8 July 2026 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: ITRE · Authors: Andrea WECHSLER (EPP), Angelika WINZIG (EPP), Christian EHLER (EPP), Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ (EPP) and 9 more
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 7 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Other decisions of the part-session on ITRE dossiers
- Decision EU-Morocco Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA): amendment and supplement International agreement · report by Paolo Borchia 8 Jul 2026 Consent given
- Decision Amendments to the Critical Raw Materials Act New EU law · committee report 9 Jul 2026 Sent back to committee
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision Monitoring framework for resilient European forests New EU law · report by Emma Wiesner, Eric Sargiacomo 21 Oct 2025 Rejected outright
- Decision Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk Objection to a Commission measure · motion for a resolution 9 Jul 2025 Objection passed
- Decision Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Resolution · report by Jorge Martín Frías 26 Nov 2025 Adopted
- Decision Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process Resolution · report by Marieke Ehlers 27 Nov 2025 Adopted
- Decision Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements New EU law · report by Jörgen Warborn 13 Nov 2025 Passed
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets”. Decision, 8 July 2026. votingId 195361, document B-10-2026-0337, reference 2026/2680(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-08-6,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-07-08},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/6}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-08/6},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 195361, document B-10-2026-0337, reference 2026/2680(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}