Skip to content

Member

Dóra DÁVID

EPP · Hungary

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
75.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
84.1 %ⓘ of 466 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
44 of 436 votesⓘ
Committees
ENVI (substitute), IMCO, PETI (substitute)
Member id
256862
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

75.2 %

466 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−15.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.1 %

392 of 466 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−11.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

10.1 %

44 of 436 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 29 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

8.4 %

39 of 466 votes cast

Participation 75.2 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Dóra DÁVID75.2 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 84.1 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Dóra DÁVID84.1 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Oct 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group 331 for, 37 against, 62 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
20 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group 124 for, 281 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group 421 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 204 for, 372 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 360 for, 210 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 2 206 for, 373 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 1 188 for, 374 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 3 to recital B 195 for, 394 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Separate vote on paragraph 17 272 for, 307 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 1 to paragraph 15 174 for, 413 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 188 for, 399 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 190 for, 415 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 13 — part 2 291 for, 295 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 13 — part 1 479 for, 68 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 6 to paragraph 13 185 for, 410 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 10 — part 2 287 for, 270 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 10 — part 1 409 for, 125 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 285 for, 238 against, 91 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 199 for, 400 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 3 298 for, 279 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 2 415 for, 177 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 1 478 for, 69 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 1 — part 2 293 for, 289 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 1 — part 1 442 for, 134 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 173 for, 403 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 97 against, 38 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 54 for, 464 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Separate vote on paragraph 33 416 for, 140 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 32 — part 2 378 for, 160 against, 64 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 27 — part 3 204 for, 380 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 27 — part 2 233 for, 272 against, 104 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 10 — part 2 369 for, 212 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 10 — part 1 361 for, 210 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 9 — part 3 356 for, 218 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Separate vote on paragraph 6 443 for, 112 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 5 — part 2 533 for, 9 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 5 — part 1 543 for, 15 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 65 for, 457 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 57 for, 443 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 86 for, 451 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 2 — part 2 540 for, 34 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 504 for, 74 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 6 to recital I 250 for, 355 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 5 to recital C 235 for, 363 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 10 to paragraph 8 222 for, 381 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 199 for, 391 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 145 for, 444 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 194 for, 408 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 228 for, 367 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 535 for, 24 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary99 % of 2 701 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary99 % of 3 611 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary99 % of 3 586 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary99 % of 3 389 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary98 % of 1 842 shared89 %
Péter MAGYAR Former memberEPPHungary95 % of 788 shared89 %
Marie-Sophie CHRIST EPPGermany89 % of 1 469 shared89 %
Willemien KONING EPPNetherlands89 % of 1 429 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany88 % of 3 162 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania88 % of 3 269 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance78 % of 1 997 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia78 % of 3 458 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium78 % of 2 702 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium78 % of 3 843 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia78 % of 2 971 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania78 % of 2 699 shared82 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance77 % of 3 090 shared82 %
Gilles BOYER RenewFrance77 % of 3 976 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania77 % of 3 461 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium77 % of 3 767 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute12 Jun 2026now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeMember15 Jun 2026now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working groupMember12 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and LanguagesIG10-25 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationIMCO21 May 2025
INI on the protection of minors onlineShadow rapporteurIMCO29 Jan 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

22 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 28 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 22 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 7

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026
22 Dec 2025Serious concerns regarding compliance with European values and EU law in Slovakia E-10-2025-005054Written questionwith 12 co-authors21 Apr 2026
20 Dec 2025Implementation of EU anti-poverty strategy based on accurate data E-10-2025-005037Written questionwith 5 co-authors25 Feb 2026
25 Nov 2025Level playing field in e-commerce: perspective from central and eastern Europe E-10-2025-004683Written questionwith 3 co-authors20 Feb 2026
17 Nov 2025Meta’s revenue from scam advertising and possible unfair commercial practices E-10-2025-004574Written questionwith 5 co-authors25 Mar 2026
12 Nov 2025Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Jan 2026

Show all 7 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 15 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dóra DÁVID”. Member record. memberId 256862. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256862. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256862?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256862,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dóra DÁVID}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256862. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256862. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}