Skip to content

Decision · Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara

Effect
Objection failed
Result
359 for · 188 against · 76 abstained roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:51–12:52
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed)
Counts are for
the objection
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single marketTrade & customs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
10 votes · 2 roll calls
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call)
Final vote
181951
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained (roll call).

Objection failed for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed).

The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 1 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and ECR; opposed by EPP, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 89Against 11Abst. 10No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
RenewFor 30Against 28Abst. 9No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.17
EPPFor 65Against 67Abst. 38No vote 18 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.09
ECRFor 61Against 10Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 13Against 56Abst. 9No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 4Against 12Abst. 5No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 5No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 53

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria1010000.25
Belgium77620.03
Bulgaria112220.70
Cyprus4011—
Czechia613200.43
Germany4536870.26
Denmark103020.65
Estonia5200—
Spain3890130.71
Finland103020.65
France16452180.57
Greece94080.54
Croatia66000.25
Hungary711030.42
Ireland112100.68
Italy5905120.88
Lithuania63110.40
Luxembourg3120—
Latvia7200—
Malta5001—
Netherlands135670.31
Poland2212460.27
Portugal84540.21
Romania1811040.43
Sweden165000.64
Slovenia7200—
Slovakia101130.75

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 623 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches126 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 10

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution B10-0503/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call157 for, 465 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
2Separate vote on recital A Counted388 for, 211 against, 33 abstained Adopted
3Vote on text inserted after recital A Show of hands Adopted
Show the other 9 votesShow the other 7 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on recital A Counted388 for, 211 against, 33 abstained Adopted
3Vote on text inserted after recital A Show of hands Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Vote on text inserted after recital A Show of hands Adopted
5Vote on text inserted after recital A Show of hands Adopted
6Separate vote on recital B Counted291 for, 316 against, 33 abstained Rejected
7Vote on text inserted after recital B Show of hands Adopted
8Vote on text inserted after recital C Show of hands Adopted
9Separate vote on recital D Counted382 for, 225 against, 24 abstained Adopted
10Final vote — text as a whole B10-0506/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens

Roll call requested by Greens.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0506

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The Commission proposed a delegated regulation on origin labelling for fruit and vegetables from Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory distinct from Morocco.

Parliament rejected the objection to this measure, so the Commission's regulation will go ahead.

The resolution had objected that the labelling could mislead consumers about the true origin, contrary to EU food information rules.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objects to the Commission delegated regulation amending origin labelling rules for fruit and vegetables from Western Sahara, arguing it allows ambiguous labelling and fails to ensure clear identification of the true country of origin.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2943(DEA) · Scrutiny of a delegated act

Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara

Parliament rejected the objection on 26 November 2025 — the Commission measure goes ahead.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 22 October 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Rejected 26 November 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · No text adopted (done)

Lead committee: AGRI

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 6 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on AGRI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara”. Decision, 26 November 2025. votingId 181951, document B-10-2025-0506, reference 2025/2943(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-26/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-11-26-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-26/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-26/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 181951, document B-10-2025-0506, reference 2025/2943(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}