| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 | 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained512–120–14 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 | 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstained105–538–3 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b | 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained96–549–3 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 | 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstained124–515–7 | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 | 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstained207–431–10 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 | 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstained451–182–10 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 | 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstained461–185–5 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 | 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstained142–496–8 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 | 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstained192–442–11 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 | 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained444–189–14 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 | 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained194–434–15 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 | 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstained120–529–2 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 | 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstained438–196–8 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 | 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained452–195–2 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 | 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained473–154–22 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 | 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained512–122–15 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 | 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained505–126–19 | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 | 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained131–447–72 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 | 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstained138–504–4 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b | 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstained138–508–2 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 | 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstained168–445–36 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 | 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstained199–437–11 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 | 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstained158–471–17 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive | 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstained197–418–30 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 8 Sept 2025 | Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PPE | 384 for, 10 against, 51 abstained384–10–51 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained523–75–14 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 | 157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained157–428–36 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 | 95 for, 420 against, 119 abstained95–420–119 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Paragraph 13 — part 2 | 483 for, 84 against, 67 abstained483–84–67 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Abstained |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 | 80 for, 407 against, 151 abstained80–407–151 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 | 79 for, 531 against, 18 abstained79–531–18 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 | 47 for, 560 against, 27 abstained47–560–27 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 | 88 for, 520 against, 22 abstained88–520–22 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 | 63 for, 552 against, 15 abstained63–552–15 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 | 123 for, 390 against, 110 abstained123–390–110 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 494 for, 83 against, 71 abstained494–83–71 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 2, adding text after recital S | 217 for, 409 against, 23 abstained217–409–23 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 | 226 for, 409 against, 17 abstained226–409–17 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 34 — part 2 | 566 for, 60 against, 23 abstained566–60–23 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 32 — part 1 | 588 for, 56 against, 7 abstained588–56–7 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 | 200 for, 417 against, 29 abstained200–417–29 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 | 193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained193–443–11 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 | 192 for, 462 against, 3 abstained192–462–3 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Final vote | Passed 542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained542–97–12 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 4, adding text after recital 2 | 143 for, 424 against, 80 abstained143–424–80 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 625 for, 7 against, 10 abstained625–7–10 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 3, adding text after recital 2 | 220 for, 416 against, 12 abstained220–416–12 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 2, adding text after recital 2 | 210 for, 429 against, 9 abstained210–429–9 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 1 to recital 2 | 191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained191–452–6 | Position: For | Majority line: For |
|---|
| 10 Jul 2025 | Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 10, adding text after recital D | 237 for, 372 against, 23 abstained237–372–23 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
|---|