Decision
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles
- Effect
- Passed
- Result
- 431 for · 145 against · 76 abstained roll call
- Date
- 9 September 2025, 13:41–13:48
- Kind
- New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
- Margin
- by a large majority
- Dossier
- 2023/0284(COD)
- Source
- Committee report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas
- Topics
- Economy & single marketTransport & tourismClimate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 67 votes · 30 roll calls · 29 amendments
- Requested by
- Greens (1 roll call, 3 split votes, 1 separate vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call)
- Sitting
- Tuesday 9 September 2025
- Final vote
- 178472
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained (roll call).
Passed by a large majority.
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 29 amendments (10 adopted, 19 rejected) and 24 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 12 rejected, 1 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.
Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Patriots and ESN; Greens mostly abstained.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 1 | Against 23 | Abst. 11 | No vote 11 of 46 | Majority line Against | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.49 | |
| Greens | For 0 | Against 0 | Abst. 47 | No vote 6 of 53 | Majority line Abstained | Clear line Abstained | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| S&D | For 122 | Against 0 | Abst. 3 | No vote 11 of 136 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.96 | |
| Renew | For 66 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 9 of 75 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| EPP | For 174 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 14 of 188 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| ECR | For 62 | Against 7 | Abst. 0 | No vote 10 of 79 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.85 | |
| Patriots | For 0 | Against 76 | Abst. 6 | No vote 3 of 85 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.89 | |
| ESN | For 0 | Against 25 | Abst. 0 | No vote 2 of 27 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| No group | For 6 | Against 14 | Abst. 9 | No vote 1 of 30 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 16
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
S&D line For · 3 abstained of 125 who voted
Abstained (3)
- Maria NOICHL Germany
- Marit MAIJ Netherlands
- Thijs REUTEN Netherlands
ECR line For · 7 voted against of 69 who voted
Voted against (7)
- Beatrice TIMGREN Sweden
- Charlie WEIMERS Sweden
- Cristian TERHEŞ Romania
- Dick ERIXON Sweden
- Emmanouil FRAGKOS Greece
- Jaak MADISON Estonia
- Kristoffer STORM Denmark
Patriots line Against · 6 abstained of 82 who voted
Abstained (6)
- Jana NAGYOVÁ Czechia
- Jaroslav BŽOCH Czechia
- Jaroslav KNOT Czechia
- Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ Czechia
- Klara DOSTALOVA Czechia
- Tomáš KUBÍN Czechia
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0.40 |
| Belgium | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0.42 |
| Bulgaria | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0.72 |
| Cyprus | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Czechia | 8 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0.17 |
| Germany | 50 | 26 | 14 | 6 | 0.33 |
| Denmark | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Estonia | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Spain | 44 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 0.70 |
| Finland | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.65 |
| France | 35 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 0.21 |
| Greece | 10 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0.29 |
| Croatia | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.88 |
| Hungary | 8 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0.40 |
| Ireland | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.70 |
| Italy | 45 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 0.57 |
| Lithuania | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Luxembourg | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Latvia | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Malta | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Netherlands | 14 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 0.28 |
| Poland | 44 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0.85 |
| Portugal | 14 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0.74 |
| Romania | 28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.81 |
| Sweden | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0.40 |
| Slovenia | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Slovakia | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0.19 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paulius SAUDARGAS Lithuania | EPP | Speeches5 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Jens GIESEKE Germany | EPP | Speeches4 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Jan-Christoph OETJEN Germany | Renew | Speeches2 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Silvia SARDONE Italy | Patriots | Speeches2 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | Against |
| Katri KULMUNI Finland | Renew | Speeches2 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Sara MATTHIEU Belgium | Greens | Speeches2 | 18 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group | Abstained |
Show the other 51 speakers
All votes on this decision, 67
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 2 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Counted | 386 for, 236 against, 10 abstained Adopted |
Show the other 66 votesShow the other 64 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Counted | 386 for, 236 against, 10 abstained Adopted |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 5 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 6 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 7 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 8 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 9 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 10 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 11 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 12 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 13 | Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 5, introductory part | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 14 | Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 5, introductory part | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 15 | Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 6, introductory part | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 16 | Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 2, § 6, partie introductive - Am 396 | Roll call | 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 17 | Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 6, introductory part | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 18 | Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, point 9 - Am 397 | Roll call | 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots, S&D |
| 19 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 20 | Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, après le point 9 - Am 398 | Roll call | 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 21 | Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, point 15 - Am 399= 412= | Roll call | 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 22 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 23 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point 22 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 24 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point 22 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 25 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point 22 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 26 | Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 4, § 1, après le point b - Am 391 | Roll call | 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, S&D |
| 27 | Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 4, après le § 1 - Am 392 | Roll call | 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, S&D |
| 28 | Amendment 401 to Article 6 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 401S | Roll call | 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots, S&D |
| 29 | Separate vote on Article 6 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 30 | Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 133/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘unless the lack of availability or excessive prices of specific recycled plastics makes compliance with that target excessively difficult.’” | Roll call | 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens; separate: Patriots |
| 31 | Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 133/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens; separate: Patriots |
| 32 | Amendment 134 to Article 6 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 134 | Roll call | 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; separate: Patriots |
| 33 | Separate vote on Article 6 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 34 | Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 150/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘from ferrous scrap’” | Roll call | 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens |
| 35 | Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 150/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens |
| 36 | Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 1, before subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 37 | Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 1 - Am 393 | Roll call | 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, S&D |
| 38 | Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 1 - Am 402 | Roll call | 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots, S&D |
| 39 | Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 1 - Am 130 | Roll call | 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 40 | Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 41 | Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 2 - Am 403S | Roll call | 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots, S&D |
| 42 | Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, après l'alinéa 2 - Am 394 | Roll call | 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, S&D |
| 43 | Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 44 | Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 3, alinéa 1 - Am 137/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘from ferrous scrap’” | Roll call | 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens |
| 45 | Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 3, alinéa 1 - Am 137/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens |
| 46 | Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1, introductory part | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 47 | Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1, introductory part | Counted | 447 for, 196 against, 5 abstained Adopted | |
| 48 | Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 7, après le § 4 - Am 387 | Roll call | 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 49 | Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 18, § 1 - Am 388 | Roll call | 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 50 | Separate vote on Article 18, after paragraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 51 | Separate vote on Article 20, after paragraph 4 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 52 | Separate vote on Article 22, paragraph 2, point b | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 53 | Separate vote on Article 23, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 54 | Separate vote on Article 23, paragraph 4, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 55 | Separate vote on Article 30, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 56 | Separate vote on Article 30, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 57 | Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 38, § 3, après le point b - Am 389 | Roll call | 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 58 | Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 55, après le § 2 - Am 390 | Roll call | 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 59 | Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 55, après le § 2 - Am 318 | Roll call | 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 60 | Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Annexe VII, partie C, point 4 - Am 407S | Roll call | 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 61 | Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Annexe VII, partie C, point 6 - Am 408S= 416S= | Roll call | 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 62 | Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Annexe VII, partie C, point 13 - Am 371 | Roll call | 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 63 | Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Annexe VII, partie C, point 16 - Am 409S= 417S= | Roll call | 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 64 | Amendment 395 to recital 19 A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Considérant 19 - Am 395 | Roll call | 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: S&D |
| 65 | Separate vote on recital 19 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 66 | Final vote A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Proposition de la Commission | Roll call | 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted | |
| 67 | Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4)) | Show of hands | Adopted |
Roll calls requested by Greens, S&D, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Greens (3), Patriots · separate votes by Greens, Patriots.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law setting circularity requirements for vehicle design and rules for managing end-of-life vehicles.
The law aims to boost recycling of materials like steel and plastic, improve how old vehicles are handled, and align rules across member states.
Parliament's position now goes to the Council for negotiation before the law can be finalized.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation sets circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles, covering design, production, and waste treatment.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2023/0284(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of end-of-life vehicles, amending Regulations (EU) 2018/858 and 2019/1020 and repealing Directives 2000/53/EC and 2005/64/EC
Completed: published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and now EU law.
Show the 6 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 19 October 2023 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 7 July 2025 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 6 August 2025 (done)
- Negotiations with the Council · Deal approved in committee 25 February 2026 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 18 June 2026 (done)
- Published as law · 24 July 2026 (done)
Lead committee: ENVI · Rapporteurs: Jens GIESEKE (EPP), Paulius SAUDARGAS (EPP)
Other decisions on this dossier
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 11 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Running issue: Digital Product Passport · Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Other decisions on this dossier
- Decision Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles New EU law · report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas 18 Jun 2026 Passed
Running issue: Digital Product Passport
- Issue Digital Product Passport Running issue · EU initiative 18 Jun 2026
- Decision Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles New EU law · report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas 18 Jun 2026 Passed
- Decision A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition Resolution · report by David Cormand 21 Oct 2025 Adopted
Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers
- Decision Waste Framework Directive: textiles and food waste New EU law · committee report 9 Sept 2025 Approved without a vote
- Decision Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengthening New EU law · report by Antonio Decaro 10 Sept 2025 Passed
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture Resolution · report by Željana Zovko 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
- Decision European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Resolution · committee report 12 Mar 2025 Adopted
- Decision Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector Resolution · report by Arba Kokalari 25 Nov 2025 Adopted
- Decision European Central Bank – annual report 2024 Resolution · committee report 11 Feb 2025 Adopted
- Decision The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Resolution · report by René Repasi 20 Jan 2026 Adopted
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Decision, 9 September 2025. votingId 178472, document A-10-2025-0158, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-09-09-1,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-09-09},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/1}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/1},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 178472, document A-10-2025-0158, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}