Skip to content

Member

René REPASI

S&D · Germany

Group
S&D
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
94.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 584 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
10 of 577 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON, ITRE (substitute), JURI
Member id
229839
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.2 %

584 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+4.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

568 of 584 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

10 of 577 votes where their group had a clear line

6 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.4 %

8 of 584 votes cast

Participation 94.2 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
René REPASI94.2 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 97.3 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
René REPASI97.3 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 353 to Article 2 186 for, 459 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Proposal to reject the text 105 for, 529 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Referral back to committee 409 for, 221 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction Final votePassed 454 for, 172 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final votePassed 379 for, 248 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 48 to recital 9 222 for, 418 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 11, adding text after recital 8 — part 2 376 for, 248 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 11, adding text after recital 8 — part 1 494 for, 128 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 60 to recital 6 220 for, 413 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 55, adding text after recital 3 165 for, 398 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 57 to recital 3 231 for, 398 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 38 to Article 1 — part 2 375 for, 242 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 38 to Article 1 — part 1 551 for, 65 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 56 to Article 1 211 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 53 to Article 1 161 for, 405 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 68 to Article 1 211 for, 411 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 45 to Article 1 52 for, 564 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 44 to Article 1 69 for, 529 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 67 to Article 1 241 for, 385 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 66 to Article 1 239 for, 388 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Separate vote on Article 1 406 for, 222 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 43 to Article 1 44 for, 584 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 42 to Article 1 74 for, 557 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 65 to Article 1 216 for, 400 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 14 to Article 1 — part 2 384 for, 242 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 14 to Article 1 — part 1 506 for, 123 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Separate vote on Article 1 378 for, 244 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 41 to Article 1 45 for, 581 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 51 to Article 1 217 for, 416 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 64 to Article 1 221 for, 413 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 58 to Article 1 278 for, 348 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 63 to Article 1 226 for, 395 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 62 to Article 1 223 for, 399 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 50 to Article 1 220 for, 415 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Separate vote on Article 1 406 for, 221 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendments 49 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 1 221 for, 407 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 39 512 for, 118 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 36 512 for, 122 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 31 517 for, 102 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 26 540 for, 82 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 17 547 for, 88 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively — Ams 1-10, 13, 18-25, 27-30, 32-35, 37, 40 396 for, 229 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 234 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 512 for, 76 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Proxy voting in plenary for Members during pregnancy and after giving birth Final vote — text as a whole 605 for, 30 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 315 for, 202 against, 119 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 71 — part 2 374 for, 149 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 71 — part 1 439 for, 100 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 67 — part 2 363 for, 173 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 67 — part 1 473 for, 51 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tobias CREMER S&DGermany99 % of 5 107 shared93 %
Jens GEIER S&DGermany99 % of 4 716 shared93 %
Vivien COSTANZO S&DGermany99 % of 5 434 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany99 % of 4 101 shared93 %
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DGermany98 % of 5 342 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany98 % of 4 797 shared93 %
Bernd LANGE S&DGermany98 % of 5 096 shared93 %
Matthias ECKE S&DGermany98 % of 5 006 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany98 % of 4 367 shared93 %
Delara BURKHARDT S&DGermany98 % of 4 362 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 207 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium90 % of 3 998 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 481 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 500 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 034 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 542 shared86 %
Michal WIEZIK RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 076 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia90 % of 4 768 shared86 %
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG RenewNetherlands90 % of 4 810 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance89 % of 5 290 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationVice-chair3 Oct 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationMember19 Sept 20242 Oct 2024

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
43rd EU-China Inter-Parliamentary Meeting, Beijing and Wuhan, China, 27 - 29 May 2026Official delegationD-CN29 Apr 2026
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'RapporteurJURI23 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationJURI9 Feb 2026
Establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034, laying down the rules for participation and dissemination under that ProgrammeRapporteurITRE6 Nov 2025
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesRapporteurJURI9 Apr 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsJURI7 Apr 2025
Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the UnionShadow rapporteurECON21 Mar 2025
Amendment of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings to replace its Annexes A and B Shadow rapporteurJURI21 Mar 2025
2022/0408(COD)Opinion rapporteurECON11 Nov 2024
2022/0408(COD)Shadow rapporteurJURI11 Nov 2024

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

35 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 51 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 35 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 16

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Jul 2026Inappropriate design of public consultation on European Partnerships E-10-2026-003054Written questionwith 2 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jul 2026Basic methodological mistakes in European Partnerships public consultation E-10-2026-003053Written questionwith 2 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
17 Jun 2026Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520Written questionwith 31 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jun 2026Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518Written questionwith 35 co-authors15 Sept 2026
10 Jun 2026Potential conflict of interest in the appointment of the Special Envoy for Industrial AI P-10-2026-002401Priority written questionwith 37 co-authors13 Aug 2026
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Feb 2026The European Parliament’s call to trigger the blocking statute to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court E-10-2026-000718Written questionwith 54 co-authors13 May 2026
6 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0437Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
1 Apr 2025Withdrawal of the Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive P-10-2025-001330Priority written questionwith 40 co-authors21 May 2025

Show all 16 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI9
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI10
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI16
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI6
7 Jul 2026Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision ECON-AM-789865 ECON5
7 Jul 2026Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision ECON-AM-790235 ECON4
29 Jun 2026Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners JURI-AM-790243 JURI5
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE1

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “René REPASI”. Member record. memberId 229839. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?page=65&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/229839. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/229839?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-229839,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{René REPASI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?page=65&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?page=65&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 229839. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/229839. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}