Skip to content

Member

Sunčana GLAVAK

EPP · Croatia

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
94.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
92.5 %ⓘ of 585 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
9 of 545 votesⓘ
Committees
CULT, ENVI (substitute)
Member id
202036
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.4 %

585 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+3.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.5 %

541 of 585 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−3.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

9 of 545 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

9 of 585 votes cast

Participation 94.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Sunčana GLAVAK94.4 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 92.5 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Sunčana GLAVAK92.5 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Final votePassed 503 for, 57 against, 108 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 224 for, 424 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 362 for, 259 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 259 to recital 4 197 for, 454 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 227 for, 299 against, 138 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 187 to Article 23 527 for, 121 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 178 to Article 22 529 for, 120 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 170 to Article 21 525 for, 123 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 250 to Article 16, after paragraph 2 141 for, 516 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 325 for, 284 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 164 450 for, 205 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 163 528 for, 123 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 162 494 for, 152 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 159 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 158 492 for, 159 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Proposal to reject the text 44 for, 600 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 438 for, 37 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on recital H 455 for, 88 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 54 for, 483 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 9 86 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 429 for, 76 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 2 441 for, 94 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 1 451 for, 43 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 385 for, 97 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 450 for, 93 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 219 for, 337 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 204 for, 359 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 227 for, 346 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 227 for, 348 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 196 for, 367 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 217 for, 365 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 386 for, 184 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 6, adding text after recital G 189 for, 376 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 5, adding text after recital G 187 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 4, adding text after recital F 181 for, 384 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 3, adding text after recital C 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 1, adding text after recital B 200 for, 382 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 183 for, 388 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 170 for, 386 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 40 414 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 39 411 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 179 for, 396 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 199 for, 372 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Nikolina BRNJAC EPPCroatia93 % of 4 076 shared89 %
Davor Ivo STIER EPPCroatia93 % of 4 814 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany93 % of 4 283 shared89 %
Karlo RESSLER EPPCroatia93 % of 4 732 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania92 % of 4 511 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania92 % of 4 782 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania92 % of 4 785 shared89 %
Marie-Sophie CHRIST EPPGermany92 % of 1 381 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania92 % of 5 270 shared89 %
Sandra KALNIETE EPPLatvia91 % of 5 093 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia83 % of 4 965 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania82 % of 4 146 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania82 % of 4 875 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium82 % of 5 342 shared82 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania81 % of 3 445 shared75 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland81 % of 4 477 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium81 % of 5 126 shared82 %
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO RenewPortugal81 % of 4 512 shared82 %
Ilhan KYUCHYUK RenewBulgaria81 % of 5 122 shared82 %
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance81 % of 2 251 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-ME Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-North Macedonia Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-MK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningRapporteurCULT13 Jan 2026
Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleShadow rapporteurCULT11 Jun 2025
European Solidarity Corps Programme (2021 to 2027) CULT/10/01917RapporteurCULT31 Jan 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionCULT4 Nov 2024

Show all 4 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

85 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 121 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 10

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
2 Sept 2026PPWR compliance costs for micro and small enterprises E-10-2026-003448Written questionNot yet answered
17 Jun 2026Digital product passport P-10-2026-002489Priority written question27 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment B-10-2026-0235Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
17 Apr 2026The need for targeted criminal provisions on cyberbullying and online harassment and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address these issues O-10-2026-000018Oral questionwith 11 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Dec 2025European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation O-10-2025-000044Oral questionwith 46 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Nov 2025EU plan to promote gender self-ID without age limits under LGBTIQ+ equality strategy 2026-2030 O-10-2025-000041Oral questionwith 43 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Aug 2025The position of printed and digital media in public procurement E-10-2025-003247Written question10 Oct 2025
25 Jun 2025Ensuring a fair and competitive green transition in the EU E-10-2025-002557Written question21 Aug 2025
28 May 2025Recognition of expenses for demography as investment for budgetary balance E-10-2025-002128Written questionwith 41 co-authors5 Sept 2025
12 Apr 2025Combating online piracy of live events close to two years after the recommendation’s adoption E-10-2025-001512Written questionwith 14 co-authors28 May 2025

Show all 10 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 51

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059 CJ6528
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790062 CJ6518
19 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the ‘AgoraEU’ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790063 CJ652
19 Jun 2026Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789892 CJ4612
19 Jun 2026Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087 CJ461
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057 CJ6518
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058 CJ658
19 Jun 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061 CJ6523
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789899 CULT5
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789968 CULT3

Show all 51 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sunčana GLAVAK”. Member record. memberId 202036. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202036?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/202036. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/202036?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-202036,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sunčana GLAVAK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202036?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/202036?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 202036. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/202036. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}