Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 51 to paragraph 48

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 51 to paragraph 48
Result
105 for · 494 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 172 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48 – Am 51
Vote id
187343
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 105 for, 494 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 17 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 6Against 102Abst. 11No vote 16 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
RenewFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 8 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 0Against 160Abst. 0No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 68Abst. 2No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 4No vote 6 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Spain200
Finland200
France600
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 617 members

No vote recorded, 101

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 101 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 576 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 520 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 572 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 574 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment121 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 570 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment122 for, 534 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 578 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 516 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 504 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 570 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 23 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment115 for, 543 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 577 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 51 to paragraph 48 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187343, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187343 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187343,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 51 to paragraph 48 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187343}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187343},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187343, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}