Skip to content

Member

Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ

No group · Slovakia

Group
No group NI
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
92.8 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
FEMM, IMCO (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
198373
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.8 %

5 502 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Non-attached median: 86.3 %

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

12.2 %

670 of 5 502 votes cast

Participation 92.8 % — Non-attached median 86.3 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ92.8 %
Non-attached median86.3 %
Lowest in the group51.3 %
Highest in the group98.9 %
Members31
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 462 for, 76 against, 106 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 14, adding text after recital P 186 for, 470 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 25 to recital P 197 for, 455 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 24 to recital N 182 for, 455 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 23 to recital M 217 for, 444 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 22 to recital K 219 for, 440 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 2 344 for, 297 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 1 497 for, 136 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 39 to recital F 231 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 38 to recital D 224 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 21 to recital D 194 for, 458 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 31 207 for, 451 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 31 — part 2 460 for, 149 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 33 to paragraph 31 193 for, 437 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 28 — part 2 303 for, 299 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 19 to paragraph 27 206 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 32 to paragraph 27 235 for, 406 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 376 for, 236 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 220 for, 373 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 185 for, 475 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 22 120 for, 475 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 13 205 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 7 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 31 to paragraph 7 122 for, 450 against, 93 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 173 for, 461 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 247 for, 409 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 29 to paragraph 5 115 for, 462 against, 91 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 235 for, 389 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 4 96 for, 389 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 205 for, 447 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 135 for, 468 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 1 234 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 8, adding text before paragraph 1 41 for, 506 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 1, adding text after recital T 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 32, adding text after recital P 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 25, adding text after recital J 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 24, adding text after recital E 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 22, adding text after recital E 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 99 to recital A 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 73 — part 1 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 2 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 1 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 11 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242322
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249290
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202410
9 Oct 20241817
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243635
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245756
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244542
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228223
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251248
3 Apr 20256255
5 May 202554
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220178
8 May 20251030
21 May 202522
22 May 20255352
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258785
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 2025134129
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 2025101100
10 Sept 20253433
11 Sept 20256968
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 2025650
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186181
23 Oct 20255554
13 Nov 2025267264
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257574
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254241
20 Jan 20266765
21 Jan 2026112111
22 Jan 20265857
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141140
24 Feb 20264341
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197194
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202632
26 Mar 20266966
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225219
29 Apr 2026296283
30 Apr 20266865
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269695
21 May 2026980
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127126
18 Jun 20267775
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267269
8 Jul 2026144143
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155153
16 Sept 20268074
17 Sept 2026124122

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Erik KALIŇÁK No groupSlovakia89 % of 5 236 shared44 %
Monika BEŇOVÁ No groupSlovakia83 % of 4 431 shared44 %
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ No groupSlovakia79 % of 5 379 shared44 %
Ľuboš BLAHA No groupSlovakia76 % of 4 952 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia69 % of 4 995 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia68 % of 5 104 shared44 %
Aldo PATRICIELLO PatriotsItaly65 % of 2 373 shared51 %
Galato ALEXANDRAKI ECRGreece65 % of 3 682 shared48 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg65 % of 5 197 shared45 %
Petra STEGER PatriotsAustria65 % of 5 334 shared51 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

14 contributions recorded; 19 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
24 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Sept 2025Wave of violence and continuous use of force against protesters in Serbia (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2025Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2025Roadmap for Women`s Rights (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women - EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (joint debate - EU priorities for the upcoming session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2024International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
23 Oct 2024Seven years from the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia: lack of progress in restoring the rule of law in Malta (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Oct 2024Presentation of the programme of activities of the Hungarian Presidency (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
18 Jul 2024Statement by the candidate for President of the Commission (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 19

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
12 May 2026Is the EU risking a new crisis and a loss of trust among Member States over the Beneš Decrees? E-10-2026-001958Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
12 May 2026Is the Commission secretly preparing to repeal the Beneš Decrees? Is postwar Europe at risk of falling apart? E-10-2026-001956Written questionwith 1 co-author7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026Is Brussels seeking to revise the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? Will the EU risk destabilising Central Europe over these decrees? E-10-2026-001957Written questionwith 1 co-author7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026Is the Council afraid to openly stand up for the postwar order – the end of the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? E-10-2026-001959Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
15 Apr 2026Interference with the sovereignty of a Member State as a requirement for the release of frozen EU funds? E-10-2026-001530Written questionwith 1 co-author15 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026Does the President of the Commission intend to use the Hungarian elections to abolish the veto in the EU’s foreign policy? E-10-2026-001529Written questionwith 1 co-author28 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026Green transition or just a rip-off? Millions of euros from citizens’ pockets will flow into Brussels funds, but will this result in cleaner air? E-10-2026-001253Written questionwith 2 co-authors12 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Does the Commission want to secretly push through ‘parenthood’ from commercial surrogacy and circumvent prohibitions in force in traditional states? E-10-2026-001252Written questionwith 2 co-authors27 May 2026
10 Mar 2026Zelenskyy threatens Orbán with Ukrainian tanks: When will the EU stop tolerating these crazy threats? E-10-2026-000994Written questionwith 5 co-authors7 May 2026
26 Feb 2026Vice-President / High Representative Kallas’s hawkish turn: from experts to soldiers – Brussels putting pressure on Hungary and Slovakia E-10-2026-000807Written questionwith 1 co-author26 May 2026

Show all 19 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ”. Member record. memberId 198373. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=102&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198373. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/198373?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-198373,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=102&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=102&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 198373. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198373. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}