Skip to content

Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
98.2 %ⓘ of 3 838 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 3 770 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line
60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id
197778
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

3 770 of 3 838 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+8.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

3 670 of 3 770 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

60 of 3 569 votes where their group had a clear line

32 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

55 of 3 770 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tom BERENDSEN98.2 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.3 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tom BERENDSEN97.3 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 205 for, 433 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 194 for, 437 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 47 200 for, 431 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Paragraph 47 — part 4 430 for, 201 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Paragraph 47 — part 3 444 for, 195 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Paragraph 47 — part 2 435 for, 207 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Paragraph 36 — part 2 431 for, 213 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Paragraph 30 — part 2 302 for, 336 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 192 for, 450 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 353 for, 169 against, 131 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 209 for, 434 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 13 to recital P 198 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 199 for, 438 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 2 174 for, 446 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital G — part 2 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital E — part 2 420 for, 224 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 10 to recital E 199 for, 441 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 9, adding text after recital A 150 for, 445 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 154 for, 450 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 81 642 for, 6 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66 173 for, 446 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 187 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55 159 for, 438 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 52 575 for, 9 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47 152 for, 454 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45 159 for, 447 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 31 to paragraph 44 152 for, 450 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 76 for, 488 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 150 for, 452 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 199 for, 446 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 159 for, 445 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 184 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 175 for, 433 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 5 to paragraph 21 189 for, 442 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 152 for, 444 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19 206 for, 432 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19 188 for, 437 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 4 402 for, 238 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 3 404 for, 235 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 2 430 for, 218 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 3 to paragraph 18 145 for, 447 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 188 for, 457 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 7 — part 2 467 for, 126 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025EU/Euratom Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty: adoption by Euratom Final votePassed 557 for, 47 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty Final votePassed 554 for, 53 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 386 for, 132 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Final vote — text as a wholeRejected 282 for, 340 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 759 shared89 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 742 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 3 594 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 3 045 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 2 789 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 2 955 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 3 321 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 2 984 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 3 093 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany97 % of 3 686 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 3 682 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany89 % of 2 345 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 316 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium88 % of 3 594 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 098 shared82 %
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN RenewGermany88 % of 2 660 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany88 % of 3 672 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 3 247 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 737 shared82 %
Svenja HAHN RenewGermany88 % of 3 368 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
18 Dec 2025European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005Written question9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006Written question12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986Written question24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051Priority written question3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277Motion for a resolution—
5 Jun 2025Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020Oral questionNot yet answered
27 May 2025Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111Written questionwith 1 co-author31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790Priority written question18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123Written question2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?page=43&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?page=43&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?page=43&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}