Decision
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
- Effect
- Adopted
- Result
- 421 for · 180 against · 55 abstained roll call
- Date
- 18 June 2025, 13:06–13:17
- Kind
- Resolution
More facts (9)
- Margin
- by a large majority
- Dossier
- 2024/2085(INI)
- Source
- Committee report by Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan
- Topics
- EU budget & fundsEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
- Votes
- 87 votes · 33 roll calls · 24 amendments
- Requested by
- The Left (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 10 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 8 split votes, 1 separate vote)
- Sitting
- Wednesday 18 June 2025
- Final vote
- 177332
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstained (roll call).
Adopted by a large majority.
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 24 amendments (24 rejected) and 62 parts of the text voted on separately (51 adopted, 11 rejected).
Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; The Left split.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 10 | Against 16 | Abst. 16 | No vote 4 of 46 | Majority line Tie | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.07 | |
| Greens | For 47 | Against 5 | Abst. 0 | No vote 1 of 53 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.86 | |
| S&D | For 112 | Against 8 | Abst. 3 | No vote 13 of 136 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.87 | |
| Renew | For 58 | Against 3 | Abst. 5 | No vote 9 of 75 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.82 | |
| EPP | For 156 | Against 7 | Abst. 5 | No vote 20 of 188 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.89 | |
| ECR | For 32 | Against 34 | Abst. 7 | No vote 6 of 79 | Majority line Against | Clear line Divided | Cohesion 0.20 | |
| Patriots | For 0 | Against 66 | Abst. 12 | No vote 7 of 85 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.77 | |
| ESN | For 0 | Against 26 | Abst. 1 | No vote 0 of 27 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.94 | |
| No group | For 6 | Against 15 | Abst. 6 | No vote 3 of 30 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 49
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
Greens line For · 5 voted against of 52 who voted
Voted against (5)
- Ana MIRANDA PAZ Spain
- Benedetta SCUDERI Italy
- Cristina GUARDA Italy
- Ignazio Roberto MARINO Italy
- Leoluca ORLANDO Italy
S&D line For · 8 voted against, 3 abstained of 123 who voted
Voted against (8)
- Adnan DIBRANI Sweden
- Christel SCHALDEMOSE Denmark
- Evin INCIR Sweden
- Heléne FRITZON Sweden
- Johan DANIELSSON Sweden
- Marianne VIND Denmark
- Niels FUGLSANG Denmark
- Sofie ERIKSSON Sweden
Abstained (3)
- Eero HEINÄLUOMA Finland
- Marco TARQUINIO Italy
- Maria GUZENINA Finland
Renew line For · 3 voted against, 5 abstained of 66 who voted
Voted against (3)
- Christine SINGER Germany
- Engin EROGLU Germany
- Joachim STREIT Germany
Abstained (5)
- Bart GROOTHUIS Netherlands
- Jan-Christoph OETJEN Germany
- Jeannette BALJEU Netherlands
- Malik AZMANI Netherlands
- Moritz KÖRNER Germany
EPP line For · 7 voted against, 5 abstained of 168 who voted
Voted against (7)
- Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE Sweden
- Arba KOKALARI Sweden
- Henrik DAHL Denmark
- Jessica POLFJÄRD Sweden
- Jörgen WARBORN Sweden
- Niels Flemming HANSEN Denmark
- Tomas TOBÉ Sweden
Abstained (5)
- Ingeborg TER LAAK Netherlands
- Jeroen LENAERS Netherlands
- Jessika VAN LEEUWEN Netherlands
- Sander SMIT Netherlands
- Tom BERENDSEN Netherlands
Patriots line Against · 12 abstained of 78 who voted
Abstained (12)
- Anna Maria CISINT Italy
- Isabella TOVAGLIERI Italy
- Jana NAGYOVÁ Czechia
- Klara DOSTALOVA Czechia
- Ondřej KNOTEK Czechia
- Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Czechia
- Paolo BORCHIA Italy
- Raffaele STANCANELLI Italy
- Roberto VANNACCI Italy
- Silvia SARDONE Italy
- Susanna CECCARDI Italy
- Tomáš KUBÍN Czechia
ESN line Against · 1 abstained of 27 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 11 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0.47 |
| Belgium | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.50 |
| Bulgaria | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0.72 |
| Cyprus | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | — |
| Czechia | 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0.13 |
| Germany | 57 | 26 | 4 | 9 | 0.48 |
| Denmark | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0.25 |
| Estonia | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Spain | 44 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 0.70 |
| Finland | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.68 |
| France | 36 | 32 | 9 | 4 | 0.20 |
| Greece | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0.40 |
| Croatia | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.88 |
| Hungary | 2 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 0.77 |
| Ireland | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.77 |
| Italy | 45 | 13 | 8 | 10 | 0.52 |
| Lithuania | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.73 |
| Luxembourg | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Latvia | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Malta | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Netherlands | 13 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 0.22 |
| Poland | 27 | 23 | 0 | 3 | 0.31 |
| Portugal | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.71 |
| Romania | 27 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.90 |
| Sweden | 5 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0.63 |
| Slovenia | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Slovakia | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0.50 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
Debate speakers and how they voted
| Member | Group | Speeches | Spoke | Final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta METSOLA Malta | EPP | Speeches1 | 18 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
| Siegfried MUREŞAN Romania | EPP | Speeches2 | 17 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Karlo RESSLER Croatia | EPP | Speeches2 | 17 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Radan KANEV Bulgaria | EPP | Speeches2 | 17 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | For |
| Kinga KOLLÁR Hungary | EPP | Speeches2 | 17 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | No vote recorded |
| Alexander JUNGBLUTH Germany | ESN | Speeches2 | 17 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) | Against |
Show the other 59 speakers
All votes on this decision, 87
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘of solidarity in the light of two unprecedented crises’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 2 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 3 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 1 – Am 2 | Roll call | 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
Show the other 86 votesShow the other 84 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 3 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 1 – Am 2 | Roll call | 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the Commission finding that the RRF has led to a sustained increase in investments across the EU and’ and ‘given its synergies with other EU funds; is, however, concerned that the RRF expiration in 2026 poses a significant risk of a substantial decline in public investment in common European priorities;’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 5 | Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 6 | Separate vote on paragraph 5 | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 7 | Separate vote on paragraph 5 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 8 | Separate vote on paragraph 5 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 9 | Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7 – Am 15 | Roll call | 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 10 | Separate vote on paragraph 7 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 11 | Paragraph 7 — part 2 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 467 for, 126 against, 62 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots |
| 12 | Separate vote on paragraph 9 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 13 | Separate vote on paragraph 15 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 14 | Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 17 – Am 16 | Roll call | 188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 15 | Paragraph 17 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Stresses that the RRF is the first major performance-based instrument at EU level which is exclusively based on financing not linked to costs (FNLC);” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 16 | Paragraph 17 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “recalls that Article 8 of the RRF Regulation stipulates that the RRF must be implemented by the Commission in direct management in accordance with the relevant rules adopted pursuant to Article 322 TFEU, in particular the Financial Regulation and the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 17 | Paragraph 17 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “regrets that the Council did not agree to insert specific rules in the Financial Regulation to address the risks of this delivery model, such as double funding; considers that the rules of the Financial Regulation should be fully applicable to future instruments based on FNLC, including as regards fines, penalties and sanctions;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 18 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 18 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 18 – Am 3 | Roll call | 145 for, 447 against, 62 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 19 | Separate vote on paragraph 18 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 20 | Separate vote on paragraph 19 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN, Patriots |
| 21 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/2 Part voted on: “including through sufficient proceeds from new own resources introduced after 2021 without any undue reduction in programme expenditure or investment instruments under the MFF; deplores the lack of progress made in this regard, which raises concerns regarding the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU,” | Roll call | 430 for, 218 against, 7 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN, Patriots |
| 22 | Paragraph 19 — part 3 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/3 Part voted on: “and urges the Council to adopt new own resources without delay and as a matter of urgency;” | Roll call | 404 for, 235 against, 10 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN, Patriots |
| 23 | Paragraph 19 — part 4 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/4 Part voted on: “urges the Commission, furthermore, to continue efforts to identify additional genuine new own resources beyond the IIA and linked to EU policies, in order to cover the high spending needs associated with the funding of new priorities and the repayment of NGEU debt;” | Roll call | 402 for, 238 against, 12 abstained Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN, Patriots |
| 24 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 4 | Roll call | 188 for, 437 against, 30 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 25 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 18 | Roll call | 206 for, 432 against, 17 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 26 | Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 20 – Am 19 | Roll call | 152 for, 444 against, 54 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 27 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 21 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 21 – Am 5 | Roll call | 189 for, 442 against, 22 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 28 | Separate vote on paragraph 22 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 29 | Separate vote on paragraph 23 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 30 | Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 24 – Am 22 | Roll call | 175 for, 433 against, 37 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 31 | Separate vote on paragraph 25 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 32 | Separate vote on paragraph 26 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN, Patriots |
| 33 | Separate vote on paragraph 27 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 34 | Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘need for an acceleration of investments in transnational cooperation’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 35 | Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 36 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 37 | Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 33 – Am 24 | Roll call | 184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 38 | Separate vote on paragraph 33 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN, Patriots |
| 39 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 33 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 40 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 34 – Am 26 | Roll call | 159 for, 445 against, 49 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 41 | Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 35 – Am 27 | Roll call | 199 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 42 | Separate vote on paragraph 36 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 43 | Separate vote on paragraph 37 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 44 | Paragraph 38 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Notes that some milestones and targets may be no longer achievable because of objective circumstances;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 45 | Paragraph 38 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “stresses that any NRRP revisions should be made in accordance with the RRF Regulation, including the applicable deadlines, and should not entail backtracking on reforms, commitments or lower quality projects but should maintain the overall ambition and the efficiency of public spending;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 46 | Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 39 – Am 29 | Roll call | 150 for, 452 against, 52 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 47 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 41 – Am 1 | Roll call | 76 for, 488 against, 89 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 48 | Separate vote on paragraph 42 | Show of hands | Rejected | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 49 | Separate vote on paragraph 42 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 50 | Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Calls for an evaluation of how this framework could enable targeted investments in EU defence supply chains, strategic stockpiles and defence innovation,” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ESN |
| 51 | Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “ensuring alignment with broader European security objectives;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ESN |
| 52 | Amendment 31 to paragraph 44 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 44 – Am 31 | Roll call | 152 for, 450 against, 54 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 53 | Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 45 – Am 32 | Roll call | 159 for, 447 against, 47 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 54 | Separate vote on paragraph 46 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 55 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 47 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 56 | Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 47 – Am 34 | Roll call | 152 for, 454 against, 53 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 57 | Separate vote on paragraph 52 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 52 | Roll call | 575 for, 9 against, 72 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 58 | Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 55 – Am 35 | Roll call | 159 for, 438 against, 52 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 59 | Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 59 – Am 36 | Roll call | 187 for, 450 against, 16 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 60 | Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘civil society organisations, social partners’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 61 | Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 62 | Paragraph 64 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Believes that the combination of reforms and investments has proved successful but that a clearer link is needed between the two;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ESN |
| 63 | Paragraph 64 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “highlights the importance of aligning any funding with the objectives of the instrument and disbursing it in line with the progress made towards them; insists that the level of ambition of NRRPs should not be lowered but should be commensurate with the RRF timeline to ensure their successful implementation;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots; separate: ESN |
| 64 | Separate vote on paragraph 65 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 65 | Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 66 – Am 37 | Roll call | 173 for, 446 against, 35 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 66 | Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 67 | Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘social partners, civil society organisations’” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 68 | Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 69 | Separate vote on paragraph 81 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 81 | Roll call | 642 for, 6 against, 6 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 70 | Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 82 – Am 38 | Roll call | 154 for, 450 against, 51 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN |
| 71 | Separate vote on citation 6 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: Patriots |
| 72 | Amendment 9, adding text after recital A A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After recital A – Am 9 | Roll call | 150 for, 445 against, 56 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 73 | Amendment 10 to recital E A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E – Am 10 | Roll call | 199 for, 441 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: ESN, Patriots |
| 74 | Separate vote on recital E | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 75 | Recital E — part 2 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E/2 Part voted on: “those words” | Roll call | 420 for, 224 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN |
| 76 | Separate vote on recital F | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 77 | Separate vote on recital G | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN, Patriots |
| 78 | Recital G — part 2 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital G/2 Part voted on: “whereas the Council has yet to adopt the adjusted basket of new own resources proposed by the Commission, which raises concerns about the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU;” | Roll call | 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN, Patriots |
| 79 | Separate vote on recital H | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested byseparate: ESN |
| 80 | Separate vote on recital I | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 81 | Recital K — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas by 31 December 2024, Member States had submitted 95 payment requests and the level of RRF disbursements including pre-financing stood at EUR 197.46 billion in grants (55 % of the total grants envelope) and EUR 108.68 billion in loans (37 % of the total loans envelope); whereas three Member States have already received their fifth payment, while one Member State has not received any RRF funding; whereas all Member States have revised their national recovery and resilience plans (NRRP) at least once; whereas 28 % of milestones and targets have been satisfactorily fulfilled and the Commission has made use of the possibility to partially suspend payments where some milestones and targets linked to a payment request were not found to be satisfactorily fulfilled;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 82 | Recital K — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas delays in the execution of planned reforms and investments, particularly in social infrastructure and public services, could lead to the underutilisation of available resources, thereby reducing the expected impact on economic growth, employment and social cohesion;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ESN |
| 83 | Recital M — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas robust audit and control systems are crucial to protect the financial interests of the EU throughout the life cycle of the RRF;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 84 | Recital M — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas the milestones commonly known as “super milestones”, in particular related to the rule of law, had to be fulfilled prior to any RRF disbursements;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: Patriots |
| 85 | Vote on text inserted after recital L | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 86 | Amendment 13 to recital P A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital P – Am 13 | Roll call | 198 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Patriots |
| 87 | Final vote — text as a whole A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) | Roll call | 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstained Adopted |
Roll calls requested by The Left, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Patriots (10), ESN (8) · separate votes by Patriots, ESN.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted its implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility, which provides EU funds to member states for investments and reforms.
The report assesses the Facility's performance and impact, and proposes improvements for the rest of its implementation period.
It also draws lessons for the future, ahead of discussions on the post-2027 EU budget.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
This resolution assesses the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), noting progress and shortcomings, and calls for improvements in implementation, transparency, and future design.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2024/2085(INI) · Own-initiative report
Parliament adopted the text on 18 June 2025. This is its final position on the matter.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 28 November 2024 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 20 May 2025 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 28 May 2025 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 18 June 2025 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: ECON · Authors: Victor NEGRESCU (S&D), Siegfried MUREŞAN (EPP)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 11 connections: Running issue: EU long-term budget · Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Running issue: EU long-term budget
- Issue EU long-term budget Running issue · EU initiative 16 Sept 2026
- Decision Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 New EU law · report by Adnan Dibrani 16 Sept 2026 Passed
- Decision Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 International agreement · report by Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares 28 Apr 2026 Interim report adopted
- Decision Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III Resolution · committee report 11 Mar 2026 Adopted
- Decision Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 International agreement 11 Feb 2026 Consent given
- Decision Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 International agreement 10 Feb 2026 Urgent procedure agreed
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Budget decision · report by Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec 22 Oct 2025 Resolution adopted
- Decision 2025 budgetary procedure: Joint text Resolution · report by Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst 27 Nov 2024 Adopted
- Decision Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 International agreement · report by Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares 28 Apr 2026 Interim report adopted
- Decision A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world Resolution · report by Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares 7 May 2025 Adopted
- Decision 2026 budgetary procedure: joint text Resolution · report by Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec 26 Nov 2025 Adopted
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility”. Decision, 18 June 2025. votingId 177332, document A-10-2025-0098, reference 2024/2085(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/4 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-06-18-4,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-06-18},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/4}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/4},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 177332, document A-10-2025-0098, reference 2024/2085(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}