Skip to content

Decision

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Effect
Adopted
Result
405 for · 210 against · 36 abstained roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:17–13:25
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Ana Catarina Mendes
Topics
Justice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
50 votes · 28 roll calls · 17 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call) · Members (1 roll call, 10 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
177229
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 405 for, 210 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 17 amendments (2 adopted, 15 rejected) and 32 parts of the text voted on separately (28 adopted, 2 rejected, 2 lapsed).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 30Against 2Abst. 10No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 4No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 135Against 21Abst. 6No vote 26 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 5No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 3Against 15Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 50

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria116030.47
Belgium133510.43
Bulgaria114110.53
Cyprus2121—
Czechia613020.53
Germany60178110.56
Denmark122010.79
Estonia6100—
Spain3410970.46
Finland131010.89
France3835440.24
Greece134310.47
Croatia65010.32
Hungary211080.77
Ireland110210.77
Italy3730090.33
Lithuania73100.45
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia5400—
Malta3201—
Netherlands197140.56
Poland2723030.31
Portugal183000.79
Romania218040.59
Sweden173010.78
Slovenia4401—
Slovakia59010.46

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches317 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Patryk JAKI PolandECRSpeeches217 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Gabriella GERZSENYI HungaryEPPSpeeches217 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Ana Catarina MENDES PortugalS&DSpeeches217 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK PolandECRSpeeches217 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Show the other 42 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Paulo CUNHA PortugalEPPSpeeches217 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nicolas BAY FranceECRSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Ilhan KYUCHYUK BulgariaRenewSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gilles PENNELLE FrancePatriotsSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marieke EHLERS NetherlandsPatriotsSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Loucas FOURLAS CyprusEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Isabel WISELER-LIMA LuxembourgEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sven SIMON GermanyEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Moritz KÖRNER GermanyRenewSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Irena JOVEVA SloveniaRenewSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GermanyGreensSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Klára DOBREV HungaryS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javier ZARZALEJOS SpainEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dolors MONTSERRAT SpainEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESNSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA SpainPatriotsSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Matjaž NEMEC SloveniaS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESNSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Ondřej DOSTÁL CzechiaNo groupSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
András LÁSZLÓ HungaryPatriotsSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Zoltán TARR HungaryEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Chloé RIDEL FranceS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo groupSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Mary KHAN GermanyESNSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
José CEPEDA SpainS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Erik KALIŇÁK SlovakiaNo groupSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ SlovakiaRenewSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESNSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Alessandro ZAN ItalyS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gaetano PEDULLA' ItalyThe LeftSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nikola MINCHEV BulgariaRenewSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriotsSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Birgit SIPPEL GermanyS&DSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Loránt VINCZE RomaniaEPPSpeeches117 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 50

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 2 Roll call174 for, 446 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR, S&D
2Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 1 – Am 6 Roll call199 for, 438 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
3Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 3 – Am 7 Roll call209 for, 434 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
Show the other 49 votesShow the other 47 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 1 – Am 6 Roll call199 for, 438 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
3Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 3 – Am 7 Roll call209 for, 434 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 5 – Am 3 Roll call353 for, 169 against, 131 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, EPP
5Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
6Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 11 – Am 8 Roll call192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
7Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
8Paragraph 30 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 30/2 Part voted on: “acknowledges the agreement on establishing the Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards;”Roll call302 for, 336 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
9Separate vote on paragraph 36 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
10Paragraph 36 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 36/2 Part voted on: “recommends the creation of a dedicated EU media freedom fund supporting independent journalism and local media outlets;”Roll call431 for, 213 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members; split: Members
11Separate vote on paragraph 47 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
12Paragraph 47 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 47/2 Part voted on: “condemns, in particular, the growing repression of climate activism in several Member States, including the misuse of anti-terrorism and organised crime laws and the classification of peaceful climate activists as members of “criminal organisations”;”Roll call435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
13Paragraph 47 — part 3 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 47/3 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to refrain from disproportionate legal action against such activists;”Roll call444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
14Paragraph 47 — part 4 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 47/4 Part voted on: “urges the Commission to systematically monitor the situation of these organisations in its rule of law reports and to expand dedicated EU funding for civil society actors combating racism and working on other fundamental rights;”Roll call430 for, 201 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
15Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 47 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 47 – Am 9 Roll call200 for, 431 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
16Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 47 – Am 10 Roll call194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
17Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 47 – Am 11 Roll call205 for, 433 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
18Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 50 – Am 12 Roll call201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
19Paragraph 53 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Is concerned that the Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law Report noted that some Member States fail to effectively prosecute hate crimes or provide sufficient support to victims of hate crimes, undermining trust in judicial systems and perpetuating inequality before the law;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
20Paragraph 53 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 53/2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Council to extend the current list of ‘EU crimes’ in Article 83(1) TFEU to include hate crimes and hate speech and calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal on hate crime and hate speech;’Roll call429 for, 218 against, 5 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members; split: Members
21Paragraph 53 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Council to extend the current list of ‘EU crimes’ in Article 83(1) TFEU to include hate crimes and hate speech and calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal on hate crime and hate speech;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members; split: Members
22Paragraph 55 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘rights and’ and ‘and calls for access to safe, legal abortion to be enshrined in the Charter;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members; separate: Members
23Paragraph 55 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted324 for, 279 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members; separate: Members
24Paragraph 56 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Member States who have not yet done so to introduce legal recognition of same-sex partnerships;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
25Paragraph 56 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
26Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 57 – Am 1 Roll call421 for, 185 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D
27Paragraph 57 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Is deeply concerned about the discriminatory measures introduced in some Member States under the pretext of fighting ‘LGBTIQ propaganda’ and ‘gender ideology’ which are contributing to an alarming increase in hate crimes and hate speech targeting LGBTIQ individuals in several Member States and have a negative impact on children, families and workers; highlights the negative impact of such measures on the freedom of expression and assembly for LGBTIQ groups and beyond; emphasises that these actions encourage discrimination against LGBTIQ individuals and contravene EU law; urges the Commission to present a proposal for a binding EU ban on conversion practices in all Member States; notes that in 2024, both the Commission and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) noted an alarming increase in hate crimes and hate speech targeting LGBTIQ individuals and other minorities in several Member States, stresses the importance of the right to self-determination of LGBTIQ persons and reminds Member States that, in accordance with case-law, the right to self-determination is a fundamental right;’Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: Members
28Paragraph 57 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “therefore urges all Member States who have not done so yet to make sure that LGBTIQ individuals have access to legal gender recognition;”Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: Members
29Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 61 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 61 – Am 13 Roll call218 for, 412 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
30Separate vote on paragraph 70 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
31Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 70 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 70 – Am 14 Roll call185 for, 447 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
32Separate vote on paragraph 74 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
33Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 74 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 74 – Am 15 Roll call183 for, 451 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
34Amendment 16 to paragraph 79 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 79 – Am 16 Roll call191 for, 453 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
35Separate vote on paragraph 85 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
36Paragraph 85 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 85/2 Part voted on: “urges the Member States to take decisive action to counter their influence through robust legal frameworks, education promoting democratic values, and support for CSOs countering extremism;”Roll call453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
37Paragraph 85 — part 3 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 85/3 Part voted on: “calls for coordinated EU action to counter this threat, including through education, social inclusion programmes and, where necessary, legal measures;”Roll call424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
38Separate vote on paragraph 88 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
39Paragraph 88 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 88/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members; split: Members
40Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 89 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After § 89 – Am 17 Roll call224 for, 412 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
41Separate vote on paragraph 99 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
42Paragraph 99 — part 2 A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 99/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Members; split: Members
43Separate vote on citation 22 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
44Separate vote on citation 39 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
45Separate vote on citation 43 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
46Separate vote on citation 48 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
47Separate vote on citation 55 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
48Amendment 4, adding text after recital A A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After recital A – Am 4 Roll call217 for, 428 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
49Amendment 5, adding text after recital A A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After recital A – Am 5 Roll call165 for, 464 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Members
50Final vote — text as a whole A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call405 for, 210 against, 36 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, EPP, ECR, Members · split votes by Members (10) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0100

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the Commission's 2024 Rule of Law Report, which assesses the rule of law situation in EU member states.

The resolution calls for protecting media freedom, civil society, judicial independence, and fundamental rights, including sexual and reproductive rights.

It also urges the Commission to act as guardian of the treaties and defend democracy, the rule of law, and fundamental rights across the Union.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution responds to the Commission's 2024 Rule of Law Report, covering judicial independence, anti-corruption, media freedom, civil society, equality, and the rule of law toolbox. It calls for stronger enforcement, expanded monitoring, and specific actions from EU institutions and member states.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2078(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 18 June 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 28 November 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 20 May 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 28 May 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 June 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Author: Ana Catarina MENDES (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 18 connections: Running issue: Rule of law in EU · Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Rule of law in EU

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Decision, 18 June 2025. votingId 177229, document A-10-2025-0100, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-06-18-5,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-06-18/5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 177229, document A-10-2025-0100, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}