Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15 to paragraph 7

Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility

Vote
Amendment 15 to paragraph 7
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2025
Result
114 for · 458 against · 81 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 87 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7 – Am 15
Text
Report A-10-2025-0098
Dossier
2024/2085(INI)
Vote id
177241
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 17 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 122Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 3Against 63Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 1Against 164Abst. 3No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 28Against 2Abst. 42No vote 7 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 50Against 1Abst. 27No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France090
Greece030
Ireland020
Italy090
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 61 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment167 for, 455 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.91 595 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment172 for, 465 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.91 615 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment150 for, 474 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 602 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 1 to recital A Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment180 for, 449 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 582 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 260 to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment183 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.90 589 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 359 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.90 590 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1 to recital E Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment184 for, 458 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 600 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 261 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 459 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.90 592 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 365 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 592 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177241
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 — Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177241, reference 2024/2085(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177241 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177241,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 — Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177241}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177241},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177241, reference 2024/2085(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}