Skip to content

Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
98.2 %ⓘ of 3 838 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 3 770 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line
60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id
197778
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

3 770 of 3 838 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+8.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

3 670 of 3 770 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

60 of 3 569 votes where their group had a clear line

32 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

55 of 3 770 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tom BERENDSEN98.2 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.3 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tom BERENDSEN97.3 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
27 Nov 2025Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 464 for, 58 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 246 for, 317 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Amending Regulations on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and on the single digital gateway as regards certain harmonisation requirements on transparency Final votePassed 400 for, 77 against, 132 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 549 for, 7 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 110 for, 457 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
27 Nov 2025Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani Separate vote on paragraph 2 525 for, 14 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani Separate vote on paragraph 1 531 for, 2 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
27 Nov 2025Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 150 for, 388 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
27 Nov 2025Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 9 46 for, 459 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
27 Nov 2025Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 79 for, 493 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
27 Nov 2025Post-election killings and the deteriorating human rights situation in Tanzania, including the case of imprisoned opposition leader Tundu Lissu Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 539 for, 0 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Final vote — text as a wholeObjection failed 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Final vote on the motion for a resolution 157 for, 465 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons Recital J — part 2 269 for, 337 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection failed 88 for, 388 against, 184 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 2, adding text after recital E 182 for, 436 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 140 for, 414 against, 99 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 15 to paragraph 33 94 for, 477 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 32 233 for, 383 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 70 for, 576 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 89 for, 549 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 31 170 for, 399 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 11 to paragraph 31 171 for, 461 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Paragraph 25 — part 2 467 for, 190 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 19 234 for, 402 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 159 for, 430 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 124 for, 503 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 173 for, 433 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 18 to paragraph 11 233 for, 393 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 133 for, 492 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 95 for, 471 against, 82 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 85 for, 471 against, 93 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 155 for, 413 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 174 for, 458 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Final vote on the motion for a resolution 49 for, 600 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 360 for, 298 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups Amendment 1 264 for, 363 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 483 for, 92 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Separate vote on paragraph 81 618 for, 21 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Separate vote on paragraph 70 632 for, 18 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Separate vote on paragraph 33 576 for, 30 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Separate vote on paragraph 31 622 for, 17 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Amendment 3 to paragraph 28 172 for, 432 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Paragraph 25 — part 1 549 for, 97 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Paragraph 24 — part 1 418 for, 228 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Amendment 7 to paragraph 24 200 for, 439 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Amendment 6 to paragraph 23 196 for, 445 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Amendment 5 to paragraph 20 216 for, 426 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Separate vote on paragraph 18 628 for, 25 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Nov 2025Protection of minors online Paragraph 17 — part 1 416 for, 152 against, 92 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 759 shared89 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 742 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 3 594 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 3 045 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 2 789 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 2 955 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 3 321 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 2 984 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 3 093 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany97 % of 3 686 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 3 682 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany89 % of 2 345 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 316 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium88 % of 3 594 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 098 shared82 %
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN RenewGermany88 % of 2 660 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany88 % of 3 672 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 3 247 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 737 shared82 %
Svenja HAHN RenewGermany88 % of 3 368 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded; 35 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
18 Dec 2025European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005Written question9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006Written question12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986Written question24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051Priority written question3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277Motion for a resolution—
5 Jun 2025Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020Oral questionNot yet answered
27 May 2025Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111Written questionwith 1 co-author31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790Priority written question18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123Written question2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=15&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=15&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=15&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}