Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9, after paragraph 11

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Vote
Amendment 9, after paragraph 11
Result
124 for · 503 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:44
More facts (5)
Position
vote 13 of 37 on the decision
Official label
B10-0500/2025 – After § 11 – Am 9
Vote id
182022
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 124 for, 503 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 11Against 39Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
S&DFor 2Against 113Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 173Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 4Against 69Abst. 1No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 49Against 15Abst. 16No vote 5 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 2Against 19Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 18Against 7Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 15 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaAmendment109 for, 446 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 512 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 14 Clean Industrial DealAmendment96 for, 419 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 515 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment142 for, 427 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 573 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Public procurementAmendment92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 586 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 Clean Industrial DealAmendment106 for, 437 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 516 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment67 for, 378 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 439 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 50 to paragraph 50 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment92 for, 536 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 605 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 167, adding text after paragraph 75 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment115 for, 471 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 577 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 156, adding text after paragraph 75 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment120 for, 483 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 594 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 48 to paragraph 5 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment102 for, 550 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 603 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 9, after paragraph 11 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 182022, reference 2025/2971(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182022 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-182022,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9, after paragraph 11 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182022}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182022},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182022, reference 2025/2971(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}